基于针对妇女健康挑战的先行-继续模式的开创性健康教育战略:系统审查和逻辑框架。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Khadijeh Khademi, Mohammad Hossein Kaveh
{"title":"基于针对妇女健康挑战的先行-继续模式的开创性健康教育战略:系统审查和逻辑框架。","authors":"Khadijeh Khademi, Mohammad Hossein Kaveh","doi":"10.1186/s12905-025-03883-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This review seeks to examine the effectiveness of PRECEDE-PROCEED model- based interventions on women's behaviors, health, quality of life and determinants during health challenges as well as associations between their constructs. Additionally, it aims to propose a logical framework for enhancing women's behaviors, health, quality of life and determinants during health challenges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In April 2025, three databases- PubMed, Scopus, and Science Direct- were searched. The search included words in the Title, Abstract, and Keywords without any time limitations. The search was filtered by Clinical Trial or Randomized Clinical Trial for PubMed, Article for Scopus, and Research articles for Science Direct. Studies conducted among women that utilized an educational intervention based on the PRECEDE-PROCEED model, were written in full-text English, and used validated quantitative health questionnaires were included in the analysis. Descriptive, cross-sectional designs as well as qualitative, longitudinal, or non-original studies were excluded from the review. The risk of bias in the included interventional studies was assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) and the Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I tool) which were specifically adapted for these study designs. The main objective of the interventional studies was to investigate the effectiveness of PRECEDE-PROCEED model-based interventions on women's behaviors, health, quality of life and determinants during health challenges. A review was conducted based on the AMSTAR checklist, PRISMA checklist and PRISMA flow diagram. Data extraction was performed with the consensus of two authors, and a narrative synthesis approach was chosen for data synthesis, following the guidelines provided by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven interventional studies were included in the final analysis. Our findings revealed that all reviewed studies provided evidence of the effectiveness of a PRECEDE-PROCEED- based intervention for improving women's behaviors, health, quality of life and determinants during health challenges. However, due to the absence of standardized measurement indicators to identify and compare the outcomes of various studies, there is a need to develop a conceptual framework that could enhance our understanding of women's health challenges including childbirth, postpartum, menopause and genital infections. This framework aims to incorporate knowledge and positive attitudes towards healthy behaviors and health-related challenging conditions, as well as self-efficacy as important \"predisposing factors.\" It also considers social support and supportive policies as crucial \"reinforcing factors.\" Furthermore, it acknowledges resources, skills, services and their cost as necessary \"enabling factors.\" Lastly, it recognizes healthy behaviors and a favorable environment as \"impacts,\" alongside improved health and optimal quality of life as significant \"outcomes\" of these factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed conceptual framework could define a PRECEDE-PROCEED-based intervention as an effective \"health education strategy\" for addressing the most significant health challenges facing women.</p>","PeriodicalId":9204,"journal":{"name":"BMC Women's Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"324"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12226866/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A pioneering health education strategy based on the PRECEDE-PROCEED model for women's health challenges: a systematic review and logic framework.\",\"authors\":\"Khadijeh Khademi, Mohammad Hossein Kaveh\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12905-025-03883-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This review seeks to examine the effectiveness of PRECEDE-PROCEED model- based interventions on women's behaviors, health, quality of life and determinants during health challenges as well as associations between their constructs. Additionally, it aims to propose a logical framework for enhancing women's behaviors, health, quality of life and determinants during health challenges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In April 2025, three databases- PubMed, Scopus, and Science Direct- were searched. The search included words in the Title, Abstract, and Keywords without any time limitations. The search was filtered by Clinical Trial or Randomized Clinical Trial for PubMed, Article for Scopus, and Research articles for Science Direct. Studies conducted among women that utilized an educational intervention based on the PRECEDE-PROCEED model, were written in full-text English, and used validated quantitative health questionnaires were included in the analysis. Descriptive, cross-sectional designs as well as qualitative, longitudinal, or non-original studies were excluded from the review. The risk of bias in the included interventional studies was assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) and the Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I tool) which were specifically adapted for these study designs. The main objective of the interventional studies was to investigate the effectiveness of PRECEDE-PROCEED model-based interventions on women's behaviors, health, quality of life and determinants during health challenges. A review was conducted based on the AMSTAR checklist, PRISMA checklist and PRISMA flow diagram. Data extraction was performed with the consensus of two authors, and a narrative synthesis approach was chosen for data synthesis, following the guidelines provided by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven interventional studies were included in the final analysis. Our findings revealed that all reviewed studies provided evidence of the effectiveness of a PRECEDE-PROCEED- based intervention for improving women's behaviors, health, quality of life and determinants during health challenges. However, due to the absence of standardized measurement indicators to identify and compare the outcomes of various studies, there is a need to develop a conceptual framework that could enhance our understanding of women's health challenges including childbirth, postpartum, menopause and genital infections. This framework aims to incorporate knowledge and positive attitudes towards healthy behaviors and health-related challenging conditions, as well as self-efficacy as important \\\"predisposing factors.\\\" It also considers social support and supportive policies as crucial \\\"reinforcing factors.\\\" Furthermore, it acknowledges resources, skills, services and their cost as necessary \\\"enabling factors.\\\" Lastly, it recognizes healthy behaviors and a favorable environment as \\\"impacts,\\\" alongside improved health and optimal quality of life as significant \\\"outcomes\\\" of these factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed conceptual framework could define a PRECEDE-PROCEED-based intervention as an effective \\\"health education strategy\\\" for addressing the most significant health challenges facing women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Women's Health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"324\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12226866/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Women's Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03883-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03883-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本综述旨在研究基于pre - proceed模型的干预措施对女性健康挑战期间的行为、健康、生活质量和决定因素的有效性,以及这些因素之间的关联。此外,它旨在提出一个逻辑框架,以加强妇女在健康挑战期间的行为、健康、生活质量和决定因素。方法:于2025年4月检索PubMed、Scopus和Science Direct三个数据库。搜索包括标题、摘要和关键词中的单词,没有任何时间限制。检索通过PubMed的临床试验或随机临床试验,Scopus的文章和Science Direct的研究文章进行过滤。在妇女中进行的研究采用基于pre - proceed模型的教育干预,以英文全文撰写,并使用经过验证的定量健康问卷,这些研究被纳入分析。描述性、横断面设计以及定性、纵向或非原创性研究均被排除在本综述之外。纳入的干预性研究的偏倚风险是通过修订后的Cochrane随机试验偏倚风险工具(RoB 2)和专门针对这些研究设计的非随机干预研究的偏倚风险(ROBINS-I工具)来评估的。干预研究的主要目的是调查基于pre - proceed模型的干预措施在健康挑战期间对妇女行为、健康、生活质量和决定因素的有效性。根据AMSTAR检查表、PRISMA检查表和PRISMA流程图进行了审查。数据提取是在两位作者达成共识的情况下进行的,并根据审查和传播中心提供的准则,选择了叙述综合方法进行数据综合。结果:7项介入研究纳入最终分析。我们的研究结果显示,所有回顾的研究都提供了证据,证明基于pre - proceed的干预对改善妇女的行为、健康、生活质量和健康挑战中的决定因素的有效性。然而,由于缺乏标准化的衡量指标来确定和比较各种研究的结果,因此有必要制定一个概念框架,以加强我们对妇女健康挑战的理解,包括分娩、产后、更年期和生殖器感染。该框架旨在将知识和积极态度纳入健康行为和健康相关挑战条件,以及自我效能作为重要的“诱发因素”。它还认为社会支持和支持性政策是至关重要的“强化因素”。此外,它承认资源、技能、服务及其成本是必要的“促成因素”。最后,它将健康的行为和良好的环境视为“影响”,同时将改善健康和最佳生活质量视为这些因素的重要“结果”。结论:拟议的概念框架可以将先有后有的干预措施定义为有效的“健康教育战略”,以解决妇女面临的最重大的健康挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A pioneering health education strategy based on the PRECEDE-PROCEED model for women's health challenges: a systematic review and logic framework.

Purpose: This review seeks to examine the effectiveness of PRECEDE-PROCEED model- based interventions on women's behaviors, health, quality of life and determinants during health challenges as well as associations between their constructs. Additionally, it aims to propose a logical framework for enhancing women's behaviors, health, quality of life and determinants during health challenges.

Methods: In April 2025, three databases- PubMed, Scopus, and Science Direct- were searched. The search included words in the Title, Abstract, and Keywords without any time limitations. The search was filtered by Clinical Trial or Randomized Clinical Trial for PubMed, Article for Scopus, and Research articles for Science Direct. Studies conducted among women that utilized an educational intervention based on the PRECEDE-PROCEED model, were written in full-text English, and used validated quantitative health questionnaires were included in the analysis. Descriptive, cross-sectional designs as well as qualitative, longitudinal, or non-original studies were excluded from the review. The risk of bias in the included interventional studies was assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) and the Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I tool) which were specifically adapted for these study designs. The main objective of the interventional studies was to investigate the effectiveness of PRECEDE-PROCEED model-based interventions on women's behaviors, health, quality of life and determinants during health challenges. A review was conducted based on the AMSTAR checklist, PRISMA checklist and PRISMA flow diagram. Data extraction was performed with the consensus of two authors, and a narrative synthesis approach was chosen for data synthesis, following the guidelines provided by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD).

Results: Seven interventional studies were included in the final analysis. Our findings revealed that all reviewed studies provided evidence of the effectiveness of a PRECEDE-PROCEED- based intervention for improving women's behaviors, health, quality of life and determinants during health challenges. However, due to the absence of standardized measurement indicators to identify and compare the outcomes of various studies, there is a need to develop a conceptual framework that could enhance our understanding of women's health challenges including childbirth, postpartum, menopause and genital infections. This framework aims to incorporate knowledge and positive attitudes towards healthy behaviors and health-related challenging conditions, as well as self-efficacy as important "predisposing factors." It also considers social support and supportive policies as crucial "reinforcing factors." Furthermore, it acknowledges resources, skills, services and their cost as necessary "enabling factors." Lastly, it recognizes healthy behaviors and a favorable environment as "impacts," alongside improved health and optimal quality of life as significant "outcomes" of these factors.

Conclusions: The proposed conceptual framework could define a PRECEDE-PROCEED-based intervention as an effective "health education strategy" for addressing the most significant health challenges facing women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Women's Health
BMC Women's Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
444
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Women''s Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the health and wellbeing of adolescent girls and women, with a particular focus on the physical, mental, and emotional health of women in developed and developing nations. The journal welcomes submissions on women''s public health issues, health behaviours, breast cancer, gynecological diseases, mental health and health promotion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信