剑桥大学本科招生面试中的“讲好中国故事”

IF 1.3 2区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Daniel Weston
{"title":"剑桥大学本科招生面试中的“讲好中国故事”","authors":"Daniel Weston","doi":"10.1016/j.langcom.2025.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article explores how Chinese candidates draw on aspects of their sociocultural background during the University of Cambridge undergraduate admissions interview, an academic gatekeeping encounter. Tannen's three-tiered narrative framework is used to capture how candidates provide (small-n) narratives about China; how these narratives are organized by themes or (big-N) Narratives; and how these Narratives stand in relation to the cultural ideologies, or Master Narratives, disseminated throughout Chinese society. The analysis shows that candidates do not simply reproduce these Master Narratives during the interview. Owing to its interculturality, and marked power differential, candidates are shown instead to engage in careful acts of sociocultural positioning in order to express ideas and opinions—sometimes on matters of geopolitical sensitivity—that may not align with those of their interviewers. In so doing, they also problematize the notion of the “immigrant story”, in which migrant candidates efface and replace their sociocultural identity with one that is fully accommodating.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47575,"journal":{"name":"Language & Communication","volume":"104 ","pages":"Pages 50-65"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Telling the China story well” in Cambridge undergraduate admissions interviews\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Weston\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.langcom.2025.06.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This article explores how Chinese candidates draw on aspects of their sociocultural background during the University of Cambridge undergraduate admissions interview, an academic gatekeeping encounter. Tannen's three-tiered narrative framework is used to capture how candidates provide (small-n) narratives about China; how these narratives are organized by themes or (big-N) Narratives; and how these Narratives stand in relation to the cultural ideologies, or Master Narratives, disseminated throughout Chinese society. The analysis shows that candidates do not simply reproduce these Master Narratives during the interview. Owing to its interculturality, and marked power differential, candidates are shown instead to engage in careful acts of sociocultural positioning in order to express ideas and opinions—sometimes on matters of geopolitical sensitivity—that may not align with those of their interviewers. In so doing, they also problematize the notion of the “immigrant story”, in which migrant candidates efface and replace their sociocultural identity with one that is fully accommodating.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language & Communication\",\"volume\":\"104 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 50-65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language & Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0271530925000631\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language & Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0271530925000631","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了在剑桥大学本科招生面试中,中国考生如何利用自己的社会文化背景。坦南的三层叙事框架被用来捕捉候选人如何提供(小n)关于中国的叙事;这些叙事是如何根据主题或(大n)叙事来组织的;以及这些叙事与中国社会传播的文化意识形态或主叙事之间的关系。分析表明,应聘者在面试过程中并不是简单地复制这些“主叙事”。由于它的跨文化性和明显的权力差异,候选人被证明要谨慎地进行社会文化定位,以表达自己的想法和意见——有时是在地缘政治敏感问题上——这可能与面试官的观点不一致。在这样做的过程中,他们也使“移民故事”的概念受到质疑,在这个概念中,移民候选人抹去并以完全适应的社会文化身份取代他们的社会文化身份。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Telling the China story well” in Cambridge undergraduate admissions interviews
This article explores how Chinese candidates draw on aspects of their sociocultural background during the University of Cambridge undergraduate admissions interview, an academic gatekeeping encounter. Tannen's three-tiered narrative framework is used to capture how candidates provide (small-n) narratives about China; how these narratives are organized by themes or (big-N) Narratives; and how these Narratives stand in relation to the cultural ideologies, or Master Narratives, disseminated throughout Chinese society. The analysis shows that candidates do not simply reproduce these Master Narratives during the interview. Owing to its interculturality, and marked power differential, candidates are shown instead to engage in careful acts of sociocultural positioning in order to express ideas and opinions—sometimes on matters of geopolitical sensitivity—that may not align with those of their interviewers. In so doing, they also problematize the notion of the “immigrant story”, in which migrant candidates efface and replace their sociocultural identity with one that is fully accommodating.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: This journal is unique in that it provides a forum devoted to the interdisciplinary study of language and communication. The investigation of language and its communicational functions is treated as a concern shared in common by those working in applied linguistics, child development, cultural studies, discourse analysis, intellectual history, legal studies, language evolution, linguistic anthropology, linguistics, philosophy, the politics of language, pragmatics, psychology, rhetoric, semiotics, and sociolinguistics. The journal invites contributions which explore the implications of current research for establishing common theoretical frameworks within which findings from different areas of study may be accommodated and interrelated. By focusing attention on the many ways in which language is integrated with other forms of communicational activity and interactional behaviour, it is intended to encourage approaches to the study of language and communication which are not restricted by existing disciplinary boundaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信