三峡大坝在物质积累速率和有机碳积累速率上是否造成了显著的损失?——来自长江最大盐沼的感悟

IF 5.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Xu Ren , Xuefei Mei , Sebastian Sobek , Jinzhou Du , Yue Li
{"title":"三峡大坝在物质积累速率和有机碳积累速率上是否造成了显著的损失?——来自长江最大盐沼的感悟","authors":"Xu Ren ,&nbsp;Xuefei Mei ,&nbsp;Sebastian Sobek ,&nbsp;Jinzhou Du ,&nbsp;Yue Li","doi":"10.1016/j.catena.2025.109277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Three Gorges Dam (TGD), as one of the world’s largest water conservancy projects, plays an important role in flood control and disaster resistance. This study evaluated the accumulation rate, sources and influencing factors of organic carbon in the Eastern Chongming Wetland (ECW) before and after the construction of the TGD. The organic carbon accumulation rate (OC-MAR) was estimated using <sup>210</sup>Pb radionuclide dating, δ<sup>13</sup>C and C/N ratio mixing model, and the contribution of rivers, vegetation and ocean to organic carbon in the ECW was quantified. Research shows that the mass accumulation rates (MAR) in the <em>Phragmites australis</em> zone (CM-1), <em>Scirpus mariqueter</em> zone (CM-2), and mudflat (CM-3) are 2.88 ± 1.32 g cm<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, 1.95 ± 0.45 g cm<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> and 1.51 ± 1.22 g cm<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> and OC-MAR are 185 ± 97 g C m<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, 80 ± 34 g C m<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, and 33 ± 15 g C m<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. Integrated analysis of MAR, OC-MAR, and the three-end-member mixing model indicates that, although the construction of the TGD and other reservoirs/dams in the Yangtze River basin has reduced sediment discharge and particulate organic carbon (POC) flux in the Yangtze River, MAR and OC-MAR in the study area did not respond promptly in the short term. This may be attributed to: (1) sampling area being situated within a sedimentary belt formed by flood-dominant tidal currents; (2) a vegetation-dominated sediment trapping mechanism; and (3) continuous sediment supply from the submerged delta (below the spring low tide line). Results from the three-end-member model demonstrate that the increase in riverine OC input driven by finer sediment grain size and the rise in plant OC due to expanded vegetated area are the primary reasons for the OC-MAR increase. The current global annual carbon loss from mudflats (4.8 Tg C yr<sup>−1</sup>) has reached 330 times the annual carbon burial in the ECW (1.5 × 10<sup>−2</sup> Tg C yr<sup>−1</sup>).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9801,"journal":{"name":"Catena","volume":"258 ","pages":"Article 109277"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the Three Gorges Dam cause significant loss in mass accumulation rate and organic carbon accumulation rate?—Insights from the largest salt marsh in the Yangtze River\",\"authors\":\"Xu Ren ,&nbsp;Xuefei Mei ,&nbsp;Sebastian Sobek ,&nbsp;Jinzhou Du ,&nbsp;Yue Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.catena.2025.109277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Three Gorges Dam (TGD), as one of the world’s largest water conservancy projects, plays an important role in flood control and disaster resistance. This study evaluated the accumulation rate, sources and influencing factors of organic carbon in the Eastern Chongming Wetland (ECW) before and after the construction of the TGD. The organic carbon accumulation rate (OC-MAR) was estimated using <sup>210</sup>Pb radionuclide dating, δ<sup>13</sup>C and C/N ratio mixing model, and the contribution of rivers, vegetation and ocean to organic carbon in the ECW was quantified. Research shows that the mass accumulation rates (MAR) in the <em>Phragmites australis</em> zone (CM-1), <em>Scirpus mariqueter</em> zone (CM-2), and mudflat (CM-3) are 2.88 ± 1.32 g cm<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, 1.95 ± 0.45 g cm<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> and 1.51 ± 1.22 g cm<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> and OC-MAR are 185 ± 97 g C m<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, 80 ± 34 g C m<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, and 33 ± 15 g C m<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. Integrated analysis of MAR, OC-MAR, and the three-end-member mixing model indicates that, although the construction of the TGD and other reservoirs/dams in the Yangtze River basin has reduced sediment discharge and particulate organic carbon (POC) flux in the Yangtze River, MAR and OC-MAR in the study area did not respond promptly in the short term. This may be attributed to: (1) sampling area being situated within a sedimentary belt formed by flood-dominant tidal currents; (2) a vegetation-dominated sediment trapping mechanism; and (3) continuous sediment supply from the submerged delta (below the spring low tide line). Results from the three-end-member model demonstrate that the increase in riverine OC input driven by finer sediment grain size and the rise in plant OC due to expanded vegetated area are the primary reasons for the OC-MAR increase. The current global annual carbon loss from mudflats (4.8 Tg C yr<sup>−1</sup>) has reached 330 times the annual carbon burial in the ECW (1.5 × 10<sup>−2</sup> Tg C yr<sup>−1</sup>).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catena\",\"volume\":\"258 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109277\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catena\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S034181622500579X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catena","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S034181622500579X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

三峡大坝作为世界上最大的水利工程之一,在防洪抗灾中发挥着重要作用。本研究对崇明东部湿地在三峡库区建设前后的有机碳积累速率、来源及影响因素进行了评价。利用210Pb同位素定年、δ13C和C/N混合模型估算了有机碳积累速率(OC-MAR),并量化了河流、植被和海洋对ECW有机碳的贡献。研究表明,芦苇带(cm -1)、海菖蒲带(cm -2)和泥滩带(cm -3)的质量积累速率(MAR)分别为2.88±1.32 g cm -2 yr -1、1.95±0.45 g cm -2 yr -1和1.51±1.22 g cm -2 yr -1, OC-MAR分别为185±97 g cm -2 yr -1、80±34 g cm -2 yr -1和33±15 g cm -2 yr -1。对MAR、OC-MAR和三端元混合模型的综合分析表明,尽管三峡水库和长江流域其他水库/大坝的建设减少了长江的输沙量和颗粒有机碳(POC)通量,但研究区MAR和OC-MAR在短期内并没有迅速响应。这可能是由于:(1)采样区位于以洪水为主的潮流形成的沉积带内;(2)植被主导的泥沙捕获机制;(3)淹没三角洲(春季低潮线以下)持续供沙。三端元模型结果表明,泥沙粒度变细导致的河流OC输入增加和植被面积扩大导致的植物OC增加是OC- mar增加的主要原因。目前全球泥滩年碳损失(4.8 Tg C /年)达到ECW年碳埋藏(1.5 × 10 - 2 Tg C /年)的330倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does the Three Gorges Dam cause significant loss in mass accumulation rate and organic carbon accumulation rate?—Insights from the largest salt marsh in the Yangtze River
The Three Gorges Dam (TGD), as one of the world’s largest water conservancy projects, plays an important role in flood control and disaster resistance. This study evaluated the accumulation rate, sources and influencing factors of organic carbon in the Eastern Chongming Wetland (ECW) before and after the construction of the TGD. The organic carbon accumulation rate (OC-MAR) was estimated using 210Pb radionuclide dating, δ13C and C/N ratio mixing model, and the contribution of rivers, vegetation and ocean to organic carbon in the ECW was quantified. Research shows that the mass accumulation rates (MAR) in the Phragmites australis zone (CM-1), Scirpus mariqueter zone (CM-2), and mudflat (CM-3) are 2.88 ± 1.32 g cm−2 yr−1, 1.95 ± 0.45 g cm−2 yr−1 and 1.51 ± 1.22 g cm−2 yr−1 and OC-MAR are 185 ± 97 g C m−2 yr−1, 80 ± 34 g C m−2 yr−1, and 33 ± 15 g C m−2 yr−1, respectively. Integrated analysis of MAR, OC-MAR, and the three-end-member mixing model indicates that, although the construction of the TGD and other reservoirs/dams in the Yangtze River basin has reduced sediment discharge and particulate organic carbon (POC) flux in the Yangtze River, MAR and OC-MAR in the study area did not respond promptly in the short term. This may be attributed to: (1) sampling area being situated within a sedimentary belt formed by flood-dominant tidal currents; (2) a vegetation-dominated sediment trapping mechanism; and (3) continuous sediment supply from the submerged delta (below the spring low tide line). Results from the three-end-member model demonstrate that the increase in riverine OC input driven by finer sediment grain size and the rise in plant OC due to expanded vegetated area are the primary reasons for the OC-MAR increase. The current global annual carbon loss from mudflats (4.8 Tg C yr−1) has reached 330 times the annual carbon burial in the ECW (1.5 × 10−2 Tg C yr−1).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Catena
Catena 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
816
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Catena publishes papers describing original field and laboratory investigations and reviews on geoecology and landscape evolution with emphasis on interdisciplinary aspects of soil science, hydrology and geomorphology. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and foster better understanding of the physical environment, of evolutionary sequences that have resulted in past and current landscapes, and of the natural processes that are likely to determine the fate of our terrestrial environment. Papers within any one of the above topics are welcome provided they are of sufficiently wide interest and relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信