Yam Hongxin Zhuang , Eric S. Lin , Xu Dai , Martina Manes
{"title":"系统回顾了建筑物火灾财务成本的识别和评估","authors":"Yam Hongxin Zhuang , Eric S. Lin , Xu Dai , Martina Manes","doi":"10.1016/j.firesaf.2025.104465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fire incidents in England caused £12 billion in financial costs in 2022, impacting lives, properties, businesses, and communities. Existing frameworks for evaluating fire costs remain incomplete. This research conducts a systematic literature review of building fire financial costs, including their cost components, and methodologies that quantify the direct and indirect costs of fire incidents, as well as the expenses of fire protection measures. Of the 15,416 studies, 9,276 were screened after removing duplicates, with 53 meeting acceptable criteria for detailed analysis. Direct costs, such as property damage and casualties, are quantified in the examined studies using statistical or modelling techniques. In contrast, indirect costs, including business disruptions, household expenses, and environmental impacts, are often underestimated. Fire protection costs, both active and passive, involving installation and maintenance expenses, are usually expressed as percentages of construction or operational budgets. Cost-benefit analyses, using Present Net Value and Cost-Benefit Ratios, demonstrate the significance of balancing the investment and benefit of fire protection measures. Findings highlight the variation in cost components and methodologies, emphasising the critical need for a standardised framework to accurately assess fire-related financial costs, enhance decision-making on fire protection investments, and reduce the economic impacts of fire incidents.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50445,"journal":{"name":"Fire Safety Journal","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 104465"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review focused on the identification and assessment of fire financial costs in buildings\",\"authors\":\"Yam Hongxin Zhuang , Eric S. Lin , Xu Dai , Martina Manes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.firesaf.2025.104465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Fire incidents in England caused £12 billion in financial costs in 2022, impacting lives, properties, businesses, and communities. Existing frameworks for evaluating fire costs remain incomplete. This research conducts a systematic literature review of building fire financial costs, including their cost components, and methodologies that quantify the direct and indirect costs of fire incidents, as well as the expenses of fire protection measures. Of the 15,416 studies, 9,276 were screened after removing duplicates, with 53 meeting acceptable criteria for detailed analysis. Direct costs, such as property damage and casualties, are quantified in the examined studies using statistical or modelling techniques. In contrast, indirect costs, including business disruptions, household expenses, and environmental impacts, are often underestimated. Fire protection costs, both active and passive, involving installation and maintenance expenses, are usually expressed as percentages of construction or operational budgets. Cost-benefit analyses, using Present Net Value and Cost-Benefit Ratios, demonstrate the significance of balancing the investment and benefit of fire protection measures. Findings highlight the variation in cost components and methodologies, emphasising the critical need for a standardised framework to accurately assess fire-related financial costs, enhance decision-making on fire protection investments, and reduce the economic impacts of fire incidents.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fire Safety Journal\",\"volume\":\"156 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104465\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fire Safety Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379711225001298\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire Safety Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379711225001298","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
A systematic review focused on the identification and assessment of fire financial costs in buildings
Fire incidents in England caused £12 billion in financial costs in 2022, impacting lives, properties, businesses, and communities. Existing frameworks for evaluating fire costs remain incomplete. This research conducts a systematic literature review of building fire financial costs, including their cost components, and methodologies that quantify the direct and indirect costs of fire incidents, as well as the expenses of fire protection measures. Of the 15,416 studies, 9,276 were screened after removing duplicates, with 53 meeting acceptable criteria for detailed analysis. Direct costs, such as property damage and casualties, are quantified in the examined studies using statistical or modelling techniques. In contrast, indirect costs, including business disruptions, household expenses, and environmental impacts, are often underestimated. Fire protection costs, both active and passive, involving installation and maintenance expenses, are usually expressed as percentages of construction or operational budgets. Cost-benefit analyses, using Present Net Value and Cost-Benefit Ratios, demonstrate the significance of balancing the investment and benefit of fire protection measures. Findings highlight the variation in cost components and methodologies, emphasising the critical need for a standardised framework to accurately assess fire-related financial costs, enhance decision-making on fire protection investments, and reduce the economic impacts of fire incidents.
期刊介绍:
Fire Safety Journal is the leading publication dealing with all aspects of fire safety engineering. Its scope is purposefully wide, as it is deemed important to encourage papers from all sources within this multidisciplinary subject, thus providing a forum for its further development as a distinct engineering discipline. This is an essential step towards gaining a status equal to that enjoyed by the other engineering disciplines.