系统回顾了建筑物火灾财务成本的识别和评估

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Yam Hongxin Zhuang , Eric S. Lin , Xu Dai , Martina Manes
{"title":"系统回顾了建筑物火灾财务成本的识别和评估","authors":"Yam Hongxin Zhuang ,&nbsp;Eric S. Lin ,&nbsp;Xu Dai ,&nbsp;Martina Manes","doi":"10.1016/j.firesaf.2025.104465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fire incidents in England caused £12 billion in financial costs in 2022, impacting lives, properties, businesses, and communities. Existing frameworks for evaluating fire costs remain incomplete. This research conducts a systematic literature review of building fire financial costs, including their cost components, and methodologies that quantify the direct and indirect costs of fire incidents, as well as the expenses of fire protection measures. Of the 15,416 studies, 9,276 were screened after removing duplicates, with 53 meeting acceptable criteria for detailed analysis. Direct costs, such as property damage and casualties, are quantified in the examined studies using statistical or modelling techniques. In contrast, indirect costs, including business disruptions, household expenses, and environmental impacts, are often underestimated. Fire protection costs, both active and passive, involving installation and maintenance expenses, are usually expressed as percentages of construction or operational budgets. Cost-benefit analyses, using Present Net Value and Cost-Benefit Ratios, demonstrate the significance of balancing the investment and benefit of fire protection measures. Findings highlight the variation in cost components and methodologies, emphasising the critical need for a standardised framework to accurately assess fire-related financial costs, enhance decision-making on fire protection investments, and reduce the economic impacts of fire incidents.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50445,"journal":{"name":"Fire Safety Journal","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 104465"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review focused on the identification and assessment of fire financial costs in buildings\",\"authors\":\"Yam Hongxin Zhuang ,&nbsp;Eric S. Lin ,&nbsp;Xu Dai ,&nbsp;Martina Manes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.firesaf.2025.104465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Fire incidents in England caused £12 billion in financial costs in 2022, impacting lives, properties, businesses, and communities. Existing frameworks for evaluating fire costs remain incomplete. This research conducts a systematic literature review of building fire financial costs, including their cost components, and methodologies that quantify the direct and indirect costs of fire incidents, as well as the expenses of fire protection measures. Of the 15,416 studies, 9,276 were screened after removing duplicates, with 53 meeting acceptable criteria for detailed analysis. Direct costs, such as property damage and casualties, are quantified in the examined studies using statistical or modelling techniques. In contrast, indirect costs, including business disruptions, household expenses, and environmental impacts, are often underestimated. Fire protection costs, both active and passive, involving installation and maintenance expenses, are usually expressed as percentages of construction or operational budgets. Cost-benefit analyses, using Present Net Value and Cost-Benefit Ratios, demonstrate the significance of balancing the investment and benefit of fire protection measures. Findings highlight the variation in cost components and methodologies, emphasising the critical need for a standardised framework to accurately assess fire-related financial costs, enhance decision-making on fire protection investments, and reduce the economic impacts of fire incidents.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fire Safety Journal\",\"volume\":\"156 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104465\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fire Safety Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379711225001298\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire Safety Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379711225001298","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2022年,英格兰的火灾事故造成了120亿英镑的经济损失,影响了生命、财产、企业和社区。评估火灾费用的现有框架仍然不完整。本研究对建筑火灾财务成本进行了系统的文献综述,包括其成本构成,以及量化火灾事件的直接和间接成本的方法,以及消防措施的费用。在15,416项研究中,9,276项研究在去除重复后进行了筛选,其中53项符合详细分析的可接受标准。直接成本,如财产损失和人员伤亡,在审查的研究中使用统计或建模技术进行了量化。相比之下,间接成本,包括商业中断、家庭开支和环境影响,往往被低估。包括主动和被动的消防费用,包括安装和维护费用,通常以建筑或业务预算的百分比表示。成本效益分析,使用现值和成本效益比,证明了平衡消防措施的投资和效益的重要性。调查结果强调了成本构成和方法的差异,强调了对一个标准化框架的迫切需要,以准确评估与火灾有关的财务成本,加强消防投资决策,并减少火灾事件的经济影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic review focused on the identification and assessment of fire financial costs in buildings
Fire incidents in England caused £12 billion in financial costs in 2022, impacting lives, properties, businesses, and communities. Existing frameworks for evaluating fire costs remain incomplete. This research conducts a systematic literature review of building fire financial costs, including their cost components, and methodologies that quantify the direct and indirect costs of fire incidents, as well as the expenses of fire protection measures. Of the 15,416 studies, 9,276 were screened after removing duplicates, with 53 meeting acceptable criteria for detailed analysis. Direct costs, such as property damage and casualties, are quantified in the examined studies using statistical or modelling techniques. In contrast, indirect costs, including business disruptions, household expenses, and environmental impacts, are often underestimated. Fire protection costs, both active and passive, involving installation and maintenance expenses, are usually expressed as percentages of construction or operational budgets. Cost-benefit analyses, using Present Net Value and Cost-Benefit Ratios, demonstrate the significance of balancing the investment and benefit of fire protection measures. Findings highlight the variation in cost components and methodologies, emphasising the critical need for a standardised framework to accurately assess fire-related financial costs, enhance decision-making on fire protection investments, and reduce the economic impacts of fire incidents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fire Safety Journal
Fire Safety Journal 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
153
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Fire Safety Journal is the leading publication dealing with all aspects of fire safety engineering. Its scope is purposefully wide, as it is deemed important to encourage papers from all sources within this multidisciplinary subject, thus providing a forum for its further development as a distinct engineering discipline. This is an essential step towards gaining a status equal to that enjoyed by the other engineering disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信