背景期和育肥期营养平面和饲粮蛋白质水平影响肉牛氮和水分代谢

IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Aghata E.M. da Silva , Arturo M. Franco , Abigail Barney , Felipe Henrique de Moura , Glenn C. Duff , Leilson R. Bezerra , Nelcino F. de Paula , Mozart A. Fonseca
{"title":"背景期和育肥期营养平面和饲粮蛋白质水平影响肉牛氮和水分代谢","authors":"Aghata E.M. da Silva ,&nbsp;Arturo M. Franco ,&nbsp;Abigail Barney ,&nbsp;Felipe Henrique de Moura ,&nbsp;Glenn C. Duff ,&nbsp;Leilson R. Bezerra ,&nbsp;Nelcino F. de Paula ,&nbsp;Mozart A. Fonseca","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aimed to examine how varying planes of nutrition during the two phases: backgrounding (<strong>BP</strong>) and finishing (<strong>FP</strong>) impact nitrogen (N) metabolism and, consequently, the water requirements of beef cattle. Twenty-four crossbred Angus steers (298.01 ± 10.17 kg) were randomly distributed in a completely randomized design following a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments (two phases and two nutritional planes). The phases being <strong>BP</strong> (85 d) and <strong>FP</strong> (105 d); and plane of nutrition being moderate (<strong>MP;</strong> crude protein-CP: 9.10 %) or high (<strong>HP</strong>; CP: 12.62 %) for BP and forage (high-quality alfalfa hay; CP: 21.3 %) or grain-finished (80 % whole corn and 20 % alfalfa hay; CP: 10.8 %)) for FP. There was a significant interaction between <strong>BP</strong> and <strong>FP</strong> (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.1) for dry matter intake (DMI), N-ingested (g/d), fecal (g/d), N-urinary (% of N-excreted), and total N-excreted (g/d). There was no interaction observed for microbial N and microbial protein synthesis (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.1). Animals fed <strong>HP</strong> diets excreted less N-urinary and N-fecal and therefore retained more N (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), increasing N-efficiency (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) compared to <strong>MP</strong> animals. No differences were observed for water intake or microbial-N (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). Grain-fed cattle consumed less N and water compared to forage-fed cattle, as well as the lowest excretion of N-fecal and urinary-N, and higher rate of N-retained and higher efficiency on utilizing the N-intake (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Animals fed <strong>HP</strong> lowest DMI N excretion, fecal output, and N-fecal (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Cattle receiving <strong>HP</strong> during backgrounding will reduce their N-excretion without modifying the required amount of water while producing the same amount of microbial-N due to more efficient N-recycling. This N and water use efficiency pattern carried over when these animals transitioned to grain-fed finishing systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"327 ","pages":"Article 116436"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The plane of nutrition and dietary protein level during backgrounding and finishing phases affect nitrogen and water metabolism in beef cattle\",\"authors\":\"Aghata E.M. da Silva ,&nbsp;Arturo M. Franco ,&nbsp;Abigail Barney ,&nbsp;Felipe Henrique de Moura ,&nbsp;Glenn C. Duff ,&nbsp;Leilson R. Bezerra ,&nbsp;Nelcino F. de Paula ,&nbsp;Mozart A. Fonseca\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116436\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study aimed to examine how varying planes of nutrition during the two phases: backgrounding (<strong>BP</strong>) and finishing (<strong>FP</strong>) impact nitrogen (N) metabolism and, consequently, the water requirements of beef cattle. Twenty-four crossbred Angus steers (298.01 ± 10.17 kg) were randomly distributed in a completely randomized design following a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments (two phases and two nutritional planes). The phases being <strong>BP</strong> (85 d) and <strong>FP</strong> (105 d); and plane of nutrition being moderate (<strong>MP;</strong> crude protein-CP: 9.10 %) or high (<strong>HP</strong>; CP: 12.62 %) for BP and forage (high-quality alfalfa hay; CP: 21.3 %) or grain-finished (80 % whole corn and 20 % alfalfa hay; CP: 10.8 %)) for FP. There was a significant interaction between <strong>BP</strong> and <strong>FP</strong> (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.1) for dry matter intake (DMI), N-ingested (g/d), fecal (g/d), N-urinary (% of N-excreted), and total N-excreted (g/d). There was no interaction observed for microbial N and microbial protein synthesis (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.1). Animals fed <strong>HP</strong> diets excreted less N-urinary and N-fecal and therefore retained more N (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), increasing N-efficiency (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) compared to <strong>MP</strong> animals. No differences were observed for water intake or microbial-N (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). Grain-fed cattle consumed less N and water compared to forage-fed cattle, as well as the lowest excretion of N-fecal and urinary-N, and higher rate of N-retained and higher efficiency on utilizing the N-intake (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Animals fed <strong>HP</strong> lowest DMI N excretion, fecal output, and N-fecal (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Cattle receiving <strong>HP</strong> during backgrounding will reduce their N-excretion without modifying the required amount of water while producing the same amount of microbial-N due to more efficient N-recycling. This N and water use efficiency pattern carried over when these animals transitioned to grain-fed finishing systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Feed Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"327 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116436\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Feed Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840125002317\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840125002317","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在研究育肥期(BP)和肥育期(FP)两个阶段不同营养平面对肉牛氮代谢的影响,从而影响肉牛的需水量。选用24头安格斯阉牛(298.01 ± 10.17 kg),采用完全随机设计,采用2 × 2因子处理(两期两营养平面)。BP期(85 d)和FP期(105 d);营养水平适中(MP;粗蛋白质- cp: 9.10 %)或高蛋白质(HP;CP: 12.62 %)用于BP和饲料(优质苜蓿干草;CP: 21.3% %)或成品谷物(80% %全玉米和20% %苜蓿干草;CP: 10.8 %))。BP和FP对干物质采食量(DMI)、n摄食量(g/d)、粪氮(g/d)、尿氮(n排泄的百分比)和总n排泄(g/d)有显著的交互作用(P <; 0.1)。微生物氮与微生物蛋白合成无交互作用(P >; 0.1)。饲喂HP饲料的动物排泄尿氮和粪氮较少,因此保留了更多的氮(P <; 0.01),与MP动物相比,提高了氮效率(P <; 0.01)。饮水量和微生物氮无显著差异(P >; 0.05)。与草食牛相比,粗粮饲牛的氮和水消耗更少,粪氮和尿氮排泄最低,氮潴留率和氮吸收利用率更高(P <; 0.05)。饲喂HP的动物DMI N排泄、粪便排出量和粪氮含量最低(P <; 0.05)。在背景环境中接受HP的牛将在不改变所需水量的情况下减少其n排泄,同时由于更有效的n循环而产生相同数量的微生物n。当这些动物过渡到以谷物为食的肥育系统时,这种氮和水利用效率模式继续存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The plane of nutrition and dietary protein level during backgrounding and finishing phases affect nitrogen and water metabolism in beef cattle
This study aimed to examine how varying planes of nutrition during the two phases: backgrounding (BP) and finishing (FP) impact nitrogen (N) metabolism and, consequently, the water requirements of beef cattle. Twenty-four crossbred Angus steers (298.01 ± 10.17 kg) were randomly distributed in a completely randomized design following a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments (two phases and two nutritional planes). The phases being BP (85 d) and FP (105 d); and plane of nutrition being moderate (MP; crude protein-CP: 9.10 %) or high (HP; CP: 12.62 %) for BP and forage (high-quality alfalfa hay; CP: 21.3 %) or grain-finished (80 % whole corn and 20 % alfalfa hay; CP: 10.8 %)) for FP. There was a significant interaction between BP and FP (P < 0.1) for dry matter intake (DMI), N-ingested (g/d), fecal (g/d), N-urinary (% of N-excreted), and total N-excreted (g/d). There was no interaction observed for microbial N and microbial protein synthesis (P > 0.1). Animals fed HP diets excreted less N-urinary and N-fecal and therefore retained more N (P < 0.01), increasing N-efficiency (P < 0.01) compared to MP animals. No differences were observed for water intake or microbial-N (P > 0.05). Grain-fed cattle consumed less N and water compared to forage-fed cattle, as well as the lowest excretion of N-fecal and urinary-N, and higher rate of N-retained and higher efficiency on utilizing the N-intake (P < 0.05). Animals fed HP lowest DMI N excretion, fecal output, and N-fecal (P < 0.05). Cattle receiving HP during backgrounding will reduce their N-excretion without modifying the required amount of water while producing the same amount of microbial-N due to more efficient N-recycling. This N and water use efficiency pattern carried over when these animals transitioned to grain-fed finishing systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Feed Science and Technology
Animal Feed Science and Technology 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding. Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome. The journal covers the following areas: Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement) Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins) Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信