烧伤后早期患者的营养干预和障碍:对医疗记录的回顾性评估

Q3 Nursing
Josefin Dimander , Agneta Andersson , Fredrik Huss , Catarina Lindqvist
{"title":"烧伤后早期患者的营养干预和障碍:对医疗记录的回顾性评估","authors":"Josefin Dimander ,&nbsp;Agneta Andersson ,&nbsp;Fredrik Huss ,&nbsp;Catarina Lindqvist","doi":"10.1016/j.nutos.2025.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background &amp; aims</h3><div>Inadequate intake and barriers to nutritional therapy are challenges in burn care. Post-burn injury nutritional care practices are rarely reported, particularly after minor injuries. The aim of this study was to describe nutritional interventions, identify barriers to nutritional intervention, and compare the documentation of nutrition for patients after minor and major burn injuries.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective single-centre medical record review was conducted on patients aged 18 and older who were admitted for more than 72 h between 2017 and 2019 at one of Sweden's two national burn centres. A content analysis and descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data, and differences were explored between patients with minor and major burn injuries.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 134 patients were included in the study: 90 patients had minor burn injuries (mean total burn surface area (TBSA) 8.1 % ± 5.0), and 44 patients had major burn injuries (mean TBSA 37.8 % ± 17.2). Nutritional supplement therapy (93 %) and nutrition prescription (91 %) were the most common interventions. Interventions targeting meals and snacks (43 %) and meal support (40 %), were documented less frequently. Fasting (93 %) and gastrointestinal symptoms (49 %) were the most common barriers.</div><div>Significantly more interventions (including enteral/parenteral nutrition, and vitamin/mineral supplementation) and barriers (primarily related to enteral nutrition and fasting) were documented for patients with major burn injuries.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study concludes that while most patients have oral intake, vitamin and mineral supplementation and medical nutritional therapy were more frequently documented than meal/snack interventions and meal support. The lack of dietary interventions, whether unperformed or undocumented, needs further investigation. Frequent documentation of barriers to nutritional interventions suggests that patients post-burn injury are at risk of inadequate energy and protein intake. Therefore, emphasising nutritional therapy and its documentation in post-burn care is crucial, regardless of burn severity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36134,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nutrition Open Science","volume":"62 ","pages":"Pages 218-232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nutritional interventions and barriers for patients early after burn injury: A retrospective evaluation of medical records\",\"authors\":\"Josefin Dimander ,&nbsp;Agneta Andersson ,&nbsp;Fredrik Huss ,&nbsp;Catarina Lindqvist\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nutos.2025.06.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background &amp; aims</h3><div>Inadequate intake and barriers to nutritional therapy are challenges in burn care. Post-burn injury nutritional care practices are rarely reported, particularly after minor injuries. The aim of this study was to describe nutritional interventions, identify barriers to nutritional intervention, and compare the documentation of nutrition for patients after minor and major burn injuries.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective single-centre medical record review was conducted on patients aged 18 and older who were admitted for more than 72 h between 2017 and 2019 at one of Sweden's two national burn centres. A content analysis and descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data, and differences were explored between patients with minor and major burn injuries.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 134 patients were included in the study: 90 patients had minor burn injuries (mean total burn surface area (TBSA) 8.1 % ± 5.0), and 44 patients had major burn injuries (mean TBSA 37.8 % ± 17.2). Nutritional supplement therapy (93 %) and nutrition prescription (91 %) were the most common interventions. Interventions targeting meals and snacks (43 %) and meal support (40 %), were documented less frequently. Fasting (93 %) and gastrointestinal symptoms (49 %) were the most common barriers.</div><div>Significantly more interventions (including enteral/parenteral nutrition, and vitamin/mineral supplementation) and barriers (primarily related to enteral nutrition and fasting) were documented for patients with major burn injuries.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study concludes that while most patients have oral intake, vitamin and mineral supplementation and medical nutritional therapy were more frequently documented than meal/snack interventions and meal support. The lack of dietary interventions, whether unperformed or undocumented, needs further investigation. Frequent documentation of barriers to nutritional interventions suggests that patients post-burn injury are at risk of inadequate energy and protein intake. Therefore, emphasising nutritional therapy and its documentation in post-burn care is crucial, regardless of burn severity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Nutrition Open Science\",\"volume\":\"62 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 218-232\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Nutrition Open Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667268525000713\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nutrition Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667268525000713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景,目的摄入不足和营养治疗障碍是烧伤护理面临的挑战。烧伤后的营养护理实践很少有报道,特别是在轻伤后。本研究的目的是描述营养干预,确定营养干预的障碍,并比较轻微和严重烧伤后患者的营养记录。方法对2017年至2019年期间在瑞典两家国家烧伤中心之一住院超过72小时的18岁及以上患者进行回顾性单中心病历回顾。采用内容分析和描述性统计对数据进行分析,探讨轻、重度烧伤患者的差异。结果共纳入134例患者,其中轻度烧伤90例(平均总烧伤面积(TBSA) 8.1%±5.0),重度烧伤44例(平均总烧伤面积(TBSA) 37.8%±17.2)。营养补充治疗(93%)和营养处方(91%)是最常见的干预措施。针对膳食和零食(43%)和膳食支持(40%)的干预措施记录的频率较低。禁食(93%)和胃肠道症状(49%)是最常见的障碍。严重烧伤患者的干预措施(包括肠内/肠外营养,维生素/矿物质补充)和屏障(主要与肠内营养和禁食有关)的记录明显更多。结论本研究得出结论,虽然大多数患者口服摄入,但维生素和矿物质补充和药物营养治疗比正餐/零食干预和正餐支持更频繁。缺乏饮食干预,无论是未实施还是未记录,都需要进一步调查。营养干预障碍的频繁文献表明,烧伤后患者存在能量和蛋白质摄入不足的风险。因此,无论烧伤严重程度如何,强调营养治疗及其在烧伤后护理中的记录是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Nutritional interventions and barriers for patients early after burn injury: A retrospective evaluation of medical records

Nutritional interventions and barriers for patients early after burn injury: A retrospective evaluation of medical records

Background & aims

Inadequate intake and barriers to nutritional therapy are challenges in burn care. Post-burn injury nutritional care practices are rarely reported, particularly after minor injuries. The aim of this study was to describe nutritional interventions, identify barriers to nutritional intervention, and compare the documentation of nutrition for patients after minor and major burn injuries.

Methods

A retrospective single-centre medical record review was conducted on patients aged 18 and older who were admitted for more than 72 h between 2017 and 2019 at one of Sweden's two national burn centres. A content analysis and descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data, and differences were explored between patients with minor and major burn injuries.

Results

A total of 134 patients were included in the study: 90 patients had minor burn injuries (mean total burn surface area (TBSA) 8.1 % ± 5.0), and 44 patients had major burn injuries (mean TBSA 37.8 % ± 17.2). Nutritional supplement therapy (93 %) and nutrition prescription (91 %) were the most common interventions. Interventions targeting meals and snacks (43 %) and meal support (40 %), were documented less frequently. Fasting (93 %) and gastrointestinal symptoms (49 %) were the most common barriers.
Significantly more interventions (including enteral/parenteral nutrition, and vitamin/mineral supplementation) and barriers (primarily related to enteral nutrition and fasting) were documented for patients with major burn injuries.

Conclusion

This study concludes that while most patients have oral intake, vitamin and mineral supplementation and medical nutritional therapy were more frequently documented than meal/snack interventions and meal support. The lack of dietary interventions, whether unperformed or undocumented, needs further investigation. Frequent documentation of barriers to nutritional interventions suggests that patients post-burn injury are at risk of inadequate energy and protein intake. Therefore, emphasising nutritional therapy and its documentation in post-burn care is crucial, regardless of burn severity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Nutrition Open Science
Clinical Nutrition Open Science Nursing-Nutrition and Dietetics
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信