传染病暴发报告的障碍和促进因素:同一健康范围审查。

IF 3.8 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Amish Talwar, Md Abu Sayeed, Tambri Housen, Rebecca Katz, Martyn D Kirk
{"title":"传染病暴发报告的障碍和促进因素:同一健康范围审查。","authors":"Amish Talwar, Md Abu Sayeed, Tambri Housen, Rebecca Katz, Martyn D Kirk","doi":"10.1186/s42522-025-00152-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Addressing the barriers to outbreak reporting is critical to prevent future outbreaks from becoming epidemics or pandemics. As most emerging infectious diseases are zoonotic in origin, this requires understanding the barriers affecting both the human and animal health sectors. However, previous reviews of outbreak reporting barriers have only looked at barriers with respect to humans or animals independently. Therefore, we undertook a One Health approach to holistically understand the impact of outbreak reporting barriers across the human health, animal health, and environmental sectors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a scoping review of the peer-reviewed and grey literature to identify barriers and facilitators for outbreak reporting affecting human health, animal health, and the environment. We selected studies that identified discrete barriers or facilitators at the subnational, national, and international levels using quantitative research, qualitative research, mixed methods, or reviews. We extracted information on publication information, barriers, and facilitators, and we thematically summarised our findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 5,177 records examined, we selected 151 matched parameters for data abstraction and analysis. The most employed methodology was qualitative (56 studies), and the East Asia and Pacific (43 studies) and Sub-Saharan Africa (40 studies) regions were the most studied. Only 45 studies evaluated outbreak reporting with respect to a specific disease. Identified outbreak reporting barriers and facilitators fell under three major themes: technical; economic, political, and bureaucratic; and behavioural and social. We found substantial evidence for technical barriers to outbreak reporting across all regions and sectors and resistance to reporting among agricultural producers. However, evidence for additional barriers, particularly barriers to environmental reporting, is more limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study affirms the importance of building countries' technical capacity to report outbreaks. However, it also indicates the need to sensitize reporters and government officials on the importance of outbreak reporting. A comprehensive understanding of the full breadth of outbreak reporting barriers and facilitators across human health, animal health, and the environment otherwise remains incomplete, with critical implications for ongoing and future outbreaks. Future studies should endeavour to fill these gaps in the evidence base as part of an integrated One Health strategy to improve the outbreak reporting process.</p>","PeriodicalId":94348,"journal":{"name":"One health outlook","volume":"7 1","pages":"35"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12224631/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and facilitators of infectious disease outbreak reporting: a One Health scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Amish Talwar, Md Abu Sayeed, Tambri Housen, Rebecca Katz, Martyn D Kirk\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42522-025-00152-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Addressing the barriers to outbreak reporting is critical to prevent future outbreaks from becoming epidemics or pandemics. As most emerging infectious diseases are zoonotic in origin, this requires understanding the barriers affecting both the human and animal health sectors. However, previous reviews of outbreak reporting barriers have only looked at barriers with respect to humans or animals independently. Therefore, we undertook a One Health approach to holistically understand the impact of outbreak reporting barriers across the human health, animal health, and environmental sectors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a scoping review of the peer-reviewed and grey literature to identify barriers and facilitators for outbreak reporting affecting human health, animal health, and the environment. We selected studies that identified discrete barriers or facilitators at the subnational, national, and international levels using quantitative research, qualitative research, mixed methods, or reviews. We extracted information on publication information, barriers, and facilitators, and we thematically summarised our findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 5,177 records examined, we selected 151 matched parameters for data abstraction and analysis. The most employed methodology was qualitative (56 studies), and the East Asia and Pacific (43 studies) and Sub-Saharan Africa (40 studies) regions were the most studied. Only 45 studies evaluated outbreak reporting with respect to a specific disease. Identified outbreak reporting barriers and facilitators fell under three major themes: technical; economic, political, and bureaucratic; and behavioural and social. We found substantial evidence for technical barriers to outbreak reporting across all regions and sectors and resistance to reporting among agricultural producers. However, evidence for additional barriers, particularly barriers to environmental reporting, is more limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study affirms the importance of building countries' technical capacity to report outbreaks. However, it also indicates the need to sensitize reporters and government officials on the importance of outbreak reporting. A comprehensive understanding of the full breadth of outbreak reporting barriers and facilitators across human health, animal health, and the environment otherwise remains incomplete, with critical implications for ongoing and future outbreaks. Future studies should endeavour to fill these gaps in the evidence base as part of an integrated One Health strategy to improve the outbreak reporting process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"One health outlook\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12224631/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"One health outlook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42522-025-00152-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"One health outlook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42522-025-00152-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:消除疫情报告的障碍对于防止未来的疫情演变为流行病或大流行病至关重要。由于大多数新出现的传染病起源于人畜共患,这需要了解影响人类和动物卫生部门的障碍。然而,以前对疫情报告障碍的审查只单独考察了与人类或动物有关的障碍。因此,我们采用了“同一个健康”方法,以全面了解疫情报告障碍对人类健康、动物健康和环境部门的影响。方法:我们对同行评议文献和灰色文献进行了范围审查,以确定影响人类健康、动物健康和环境的疫情报告的障碍和促进因素。通过定量研究、定性研究、混合方法或综述,我们选择了在次国家、国家和国际层面确定离散障碍或促进因素的研究。我们提取了关于出版信息、障碍和促进因素的信息,并按主题总结了我们的发现。结果:在5177条记录中,我们选择了151条匹配的参数进行数据提取和分析。使用最多的方法是定性的(56项研究),东亚和太平洋(43项研究)和撒哈拉以南非洲(40项研究)区域是研究最多的区域。只有45项研究评估了与特定疾病有关的疫情报告。已确定的爆发报告障碍和促进因素分为三个主要主题:技术;经济、政治和官僚;行为和社会。我们发现了大量证据,表明在所有地区和部门报告疫情存在技术障碍,农业生产者对报告存在抵制。然而,关于其他障碍的证据,特别是环境报告的障碍,则更为有限。结论:这项研究肯定了建设国家报告疫情的技术能力的重要性。然而,这也表明有必要提高记者和政府官员对疫情报告重要性的认识。对人类健康、动物健康和环境中所有暴发报告障碍和促进因素的全面了解仍然不完整,这对正在发生的和未来的暴发具有重大影响。未来的研究应努力填补证据基础中的这些空白,作为改善疫情报告过程的“一个健康”综合战略的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers and facilitators of infectious disease outbreak reporting: a One Health scoping review.

Background: Addressing the barriers to outbreak reporting is critical to prevent future outbreaks from becoming epidemics or pandemics. As most emerging infectious diseases are zoonotic in origin, this requires understanding the barriers affecting both the human and animal health sectors. However, previous reviews of outbreak reporting barriers have only looked at barriers with respect to humans or animals independently. Therefore, we undertook a One Health approach to holistically understand the impact of outbreak reporting barriers across the human health, animal health, and environmental sectors.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review of the peer-reviewed and grey literature to identify barriers and facilitators for outbreak reporting affecting human health, animal health, and the environment. We selected studies that identified discrete barriers or facilitators at the subnational, national, and international levels using quantitative research, qualitative research, mixed methods, or reviews. We extracted information on publication information, barriers, and facilitators, and we thematically summarised our findings.

Results: Among 5,177 records examined, we selected 151 matched parameters for data abstraction and analysis. The most employed methodology was qualitative (56 studies), and the East Asia and Pacific (43 studies) and Sub-Saharan Africa (40 studies) regions were the most studied. Only 45 studies evaluated outbreak reporting with respect to a specific disease. Identified outbreak reporting barriers and facilitators fell under three major themes: technical; economic, political, and bureaucratic; and behavioural and social. We found substantial evidence for technical barriers to outbreak reporting across all regions and sectors and resistance to reporting among agricultural producers. However, evidence for additional barriers, particularly barriers to environmental reporting, is more limited.

Conclusions: This study affirms the importance of building countries' technical capacity to report outbreaks. However, it also indicates the need to sensitize reporters and government officials on the importance of outbreak reporting. A comprehensive understanding of the full breadth of outbreak reporting barriers and facilitators across human health, animal health, and the environment otherwise remains incomplete, with critical implications for ongoing and future outbreaks. Future studies should endeavour to fill these gaps in the evidence base as part of an integrated One Health strategy to improve the outbreak reporting process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信