欧洲卫生数据空间下的二次使用:为加强隐私技术的研究议程奠定基础。

IF 3.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in digital health Pub Date : 2025-06-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1602101
Sarah van Drumpt, Kartik Chawla, Tom Barbereau, Dayana Spagnuelo, Linda van de Burgwal
{"title":"欧洲卫生数据空间下的二次使用:为加强隐私技术的研究议程奠定基础。","authors":"Sarah van Drumpt, Kartik Chawla, Tom Barbereau, Dayana Spagnuelo, Linda van de Burgwal","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2025.1602101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Regulation for European Health Data Space (EHDS) aims to address the fragmented health data landscape across Europe by promoting ethical and responsible reuse of data, seeking to balance the opportunities for data reuse with the risks it entails. However, the techno-legal aspects of navigating this balance remain poorly understood. This study adopts a qualitative and inductive approach, using semi-structured interviews to explore the risks, challenges, and gaps in the implementation of privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs) within EHDS, particularly in the context of its governance structure and data permits for secondary data use. The findings identify five distinct categories of concerns, based on fourteen risks, and highlight seven governance and technological solutions, illustrating how these solutions address multiple, often correlated risks. The interdependence between concerns and solutions emphasises the need for a strategic and integrated approach to both governance and technology. This mapping between the risks and solutions also highlights the central role of certain solutions, such as public engagement and awareness, in addressing multiple risks. Furthermore, it introduces a new dimension to the concerns by focusing on the structural imbalances in access to the health data economy. We conclude by proposing a research agenda to advance the integration of PETs into the EHDS framework, ensuring that data permits can effectively facilitate secure, ethical, and innovative health data use.</p>","PeriodicalId":73078,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in digital health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1602101"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12222193/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Secondary use under the European Health Data Space: setting the scene and towards a research agenda on privacy-enhancing technologies.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah van Drumpt, Kartik Chawla, Tom Barbereau, Dayana Spagnuelo, Linda van de Burgwal\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fdgth.2025.1602101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Regulation for European Health Data Space (EHDS) aims to address the fragmented health data landscape across Europe by promoting ethical and responsible reuse of data, seeking to balance the opportunities for data reuse with the risks it entails. However, the techno-legal aspects of navigating this balance remain poorly understood. This study adopts a qualitative and inductive approach, using semi-structured interviews to explore the risks, challenges, and gaps in the implementation of privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs) within EHDS, particularly in the context of its governance structure and data permits for secondary data use. The findings identify five distinct categories of concerns, based on fourteen risks, and highlight seven governance and technological solutions, illustrating how these solutions address multiple, often correlated risks. The interdependence between concerns and solutions emphasises the need for a strategic and integrated approach to both governance and technology. This mapping between the risks and solutions also highlights the central role of certain solutions, such as public engagement and awareness, in addressing multiple risks. Furthermore, it introduces a new dimension to the concerns by focusing on the structural imbalances in access to the health data economy. We conclude by proposing a research agenda to advance the integration of PETs into the EHDS framework, ensuring that data permits can effectively facilitate secure, ethical, and innovative health data use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in digital health\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"1602101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12222193/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1602101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1602101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《欧洲卫生数据空间条例》(EHDS)旨在通过促进合乎道德和负责任的数据重用,寻求平衡数据重用的机会及其带来的风险,解决整个欧洲分散的卫生数据格局。然而,人们对如何在这种平衡中找到方向的技术和法律方面仍然知之甚少。本研究采用定性和归纳的方法,使用半结构化访谈来探讨在EHDS中实施隐私增强技术(pet)的风险、挑战和差距,特别是在其治理结构和二次数据使用数据许可的背景下。研究结果确定了基于14个风险的五个不同的关注类别,并突出了7个治理和技术解决方案,说明了这些解决方案如何处理多个,通常是相关的风险。关注点和解决方案之间的相互依赖强调了对治理和技术的战略和集成方法的需要。风险与解决方案之间的关系也突出了某些解决方案在应对多重风险方面的核心作用,例如公众参与和意识。此外,它通过关注获取卫生数据经济方面的结构性不平衡,为这些关切提供了一个新的层面。最后,我们提出了一项研究议程,以推进pet与EHDS框架的整合,确保数据许可能够有效促进安全、道德和创新的健康数据使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Secondary use under the European Health Data Space: setting the scene and towards a research agenda on privacy-enhancing technologies.

The Regulation for European Health Data Space (EHDS) aims to address the fragmented health data landscape across Europe by promoting ethical and responsible reuse of data, seeking to balance the opportunities for data reuse with the risks it entails. However, the techno-legal aspects of navigating this balance remain poorly understood. This study adopts a qualitative and inductive approach, using semi-structured interviews to explore the risks, challenges, and gaps in the implementation of privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs) within EHDS, particularly in the context of its governance structure and data permits for secondary data use. The findings identify five distinct categories of concerns, based on fourteen risks, and highlight seven governance and technological solutions, illustrating how these solutions address multiple, often correlated risks. The interdependence between concerns and solutions emphasises the need for a strategic and integrated approach to both governance and technology. This mapping between the risks and solutions also highlights the central role of certain solutions, such as public engagement and awareness, in addressing multiple risks. Furthermore, it introduces a new dimension to the concerns by focusing on the structural imbalances in access to the health data economy. We conclude by proposing a research agenda to advance the integration of PETs into the EHDS framework, ensuring that data permits can effectively facilitate secure, ethical, and innovative health data use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信