儿科临床服务提供的护理标准:快速范围审查。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Brittany Barber, Annette Elliott-Rose, Amanda Higgins, Kristy Hancock, Amy Mireault, Katie McDonald, Stacy Burgess, LeeAnn Larocque, Christine Cassidy
{"title":"儿科临床服务提供的护理标准:快速范围审查。","authors":"Brittany Barber, Annette Elliott-Rose, Amanda Higgins, Kristy Hancock, Amy Mireault, Katie McDonald, Stacy Burgess, LeeAnn Larocque, Christine Cassidy","doi":"10.1177/13674935251355056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When pediatric services are not coordinated, children, youth, and their caregivers cannot always access the right services at the right time. Guidance is needed for how pediatric services should be planned and organized to improve integrated care. The objective of this rapid scoping review was to map and characterize current evidence on standards of care for integrated pediatric levels of service. This rapid scoping review was conducted in accordance with Cochrane Rapid Reviews Interim Guidance. We searched academic databases and gray literature in 2022, published in English from Canada, United States, United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, with no date parameter. Fifty-three sources met inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Levels of service frameworks categorized services into three, four, or six distinct levels. Eight sources described integrated levels of service. Most pediatric standards of care frameworks defined levels of service by roles and responsibilities. Differences were defined by transitions between levels of care, planning for services across urban and rural communities, and coordinating integrated levels of service. Future research is required to build evidence base of how levels of service frameworks can be used in practice, adapted to local contexts, and evaluated.</p>","PeriodicalId":54388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"13674935251355056"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standards of care for pediatric clinical service delivery: A rapid scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Brittany Barber, Annette Elliott-Rose, Amanda Higgins, Kristy Hancock, Amy Mireault, Katie McDonald, Stacy Burgess, LeeAnn Larocque, Christine Cassidy\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13674935251355056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>When pediatric services are not coordinated, children, youth, and their caregivers cannot always access the right services at the right time. Guidance is needed for how pediatric services should be planned and organized to improve integrated care. The objective of this rapid scoping review was to map and characterize current evidence on standards of care for integrated pediatric levels of service. This rapid scoping review was conducted in accordance with Cochrane Rapid Reviews Interim Guidance. We searched academic databases and gray literature in 2022, published in English from Canada, United States, United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, with no date parameter. Fifty-three sources met inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Levels of service frameworks categorized services into three, four, or six distinct levels. Eight sources described integrated levels of service. Most pediatric standards of care frameworks defined levels of service by roles and responsibilities. Differences were defined by transitions between levels of care, planning for services across urban and rural communities, and coordinating integrated levels of service. Future research is required to build evidence base of how levels of service frameworks can be used in practice, adapted to local contexts, and evaluated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Child Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13674935251355056\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Child Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13674935251355056\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13674935251355056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如果儿科服务得不到协调,儿童、青年及其照料者就不能总是在正确的时间获得正确的服务。需要指导如何规划和组织儿科服务,以改善综合护理。这项快速范围审查的目的是绘制和描述综合儿科服务水平护理标准的现有证据。根据Cochrane快速综述中期指南进行快速范围综述。我们检索了2022年加拿大、美国、英国、澳大利亚、新西兰发表的英文学术数据库和灰色文献,没有日期参数。53个来源符合纳入标准,纳入本综述。服务框架的级别将服务分类为三个、四个或六个不同的级别。八个来源描述了综合服务水平。大多数儿科护理标准框架根据角色和责任定义了服务水平。差异由护理水平之间的过渡、城乡社区的服务规划以及协调综合服务水平来定义。未来的研究需要建立证据基础,以证明服务框架的水平如何在实践中使用,适应当地环境,并进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Standards of care for pediatric clinical service delivery: A rapid scoping review.

When pediatric services are not coordinated, children, youth, and their caregivers cannot always access the right services at the right time. Guidance is needed for how pediatric services should be planned and organized to improve integrated care. The objective of this rapid scoping review was to map and characterize current evidence on standards of care for integrated pediatric levels of service. This rapid scoping review was conducted in accordance with Cochrane Rapid Reviews Interim Guidance. We searched academic databases and gray literature in 2022, published in English from Canada, United States, United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, with no date parameter. Fifty-three sources met inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Levels of service frameworks categorized services into three, four, or six distinct levels. Eight sources described integrated levels of service. Most pediatric standards of care frameworks defined levels of service by roles and responsibilities. Differences were defined by transitions between levels of care, planning for services across urban and rural communities, and coordinating integrated levels of service. Future research is required to build evidence base of how levels of service frameworks can be used in practice, adapted to local contexts, and evaluated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Child Health Care
Journal of Child Health Care NURSING-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.80%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Child Health Care is a broad ranging, international, professionally-oriented, interdisciplinary and peer reviewed journal. It focuses on issues related to the health and health care of neonates, children, young people and their families, including areas such as illness, disability, complex needs, well-being, quality of life and mental health care in a diverse range of settings. The Journal of Child Health Care publishes original theoretical, empirical and review papers which have application to a wide variety of disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信