Jiaxu Liang, Fukun Shi, Lan Zhang, Suo Yin, Yong Chen
{"title":"肝切除术后肝衰竭的SWE诊断性能和基于SWE的预测模型:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Jiaxu Liang, Fukun Shi, Lan Zhang, Suo Yin, Yong Chen","doi":"10.2174/0115734056379123250626163120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-hepatic resection liver failure (PHLF) remains one of the most serious complications after hepatic resection, with an overall morbidity rate as high as 32% and an approximate 5% mortality. Previous studies demonstrate the potential of shear wave elastography (SWE) to predict PHLF. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of SWE in identifying liver failure after hepatectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was performed across PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science to identify studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of SWE for predicting PHLF. The combined sensitivity, specificity, and the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve (HSROC) for SWE in detecting PHLF in liver resection patients. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool was used to evaluate the quality of the studies included in the analysis. Heterogeneity was explored through sensitivity analysis, univariable meta-regression and subgroup analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis included a total of 13 studies involving 2985 patients. For quantitative analysis. The combined sensitivities and specificities of SWE for detecting post-hepatectomy liver failure were 0.81 and 0.68, respectively. The HSROC value for SWE was 0.82. Significant heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 80.22) was observed in pooled specificity. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses suggest that differences in the proportion of patients with HCC and in the diagnostic criteria for PHLF may account for the observed heterogeneity. For the qualitative analysis, six predictive models based on SWE were included, and their AUCs were 0.80-0.915.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both SWE alone and SWE-based prediction models appear to accurately detect PHLF and help to categorize patients into high- and low-risk groups. It may also assist surgeons in identifying the best candidates for liver resection and enhancing perioperative management.</p>","PeriodicalId":54215,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e15734056379123"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Performance of SWE and Predictive Models Based on SWE for Post- Hepatectomy Liver Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jiaxu Liang, Fukun Shi, Lan Zhang, Suo Yin, Yong Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0115734056379123250626163120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-hepatic resection liver failure (PHLF) remains one of the most serious complications after hepatic resection, with an overall morbidity rate as high as 32% and an approximate 5% mortality. Previous studies demonstrate the potential of shear wave elastography (SWE) to predict PHLF. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of SWE in identifying liver failure after hepatectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was performed across PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science to identify studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of SWE for predicting PHLF. The combined sensitivity, specificity, and the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve (HSROC) for SWE in detecting PHLF in liver resection patients. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool was used to evaluate the quality of the studies included in the analysis. Heterogeneity was explored through sensitivity analysis, univariable meta-regression and subgroup analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis included a total of 13 studies involving 2985 patients. For quantitative analysis. The combined sensitivities and specificities of SWE for detecting post-hepatectomy liver failure were 0.81 and 0.68, respectively. The HSROC value for SWE was 0.82. Significant heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 80.22) was observed in pooled specificity. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses suggest that differences in the proportion of patients with HCC and in the diagnostic criteria for PHLF may account for the observed heterogeneity. For the qualitative analysis, six predictive models based on SWE were included, and their AUCs were 0.80-0.915.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both SWE alone and SWE-based prediction models appear to accurately detect PHLF and help to categorize patients into high- and low-risk groups. It may also assist surgeons in identifying the best candidates for liver resection and enhancing perioperative management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Medical Imaging Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e15734056379123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Medical Imaging Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056379123250626163120\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056379123250626163120","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:肝切除术后肝功能衰竭(PHLF)仍然是肝切除术后最严重的并发症之一,总发病率高达32%,死亡率约为5%。先前的研究表明,剪切波弹性图(SWE)在预测PHLF方面具有潜力。本荟萃分析旨在评估SWE诊断肝切除术后肝功能衰竭的准确性。方法:通过PubMed/Medline、Embase和Web of Science进行综合检索,以确定评估SWE预测PHLF诊断准确性的研究。SWE检测肝切除术患者PHLF的综合敏感性、特异性和分级汇总受者工作特征曲线(HSROC)。使用诊断准确性研究的质量评估工具来评估纳入分析的研究的质量。通过敏感性分析、单变量元回归和亚组分析探讨异质性。结果:本荟萃分析共纳入13项研究,涉及2985例患者。用于定量分析。SWE检测肝切除术后肝功能衰竭的综合敏感性和特异性分别为0.81和0.68。SWE的HSROC值为0.82。合并特异性存在显著异质性(I2 = 80.22)。meta回归和亚组分析表明,HCC患者比例和PHLF诊断标准的差异可能解释了观察到的异质性。定性分析采用6个基于SWE的预测模型,auc均为0.80 ~ 0.915。结论:单独使用SWE和基于SWE的预测模型似乎都能准确地检测出PHLF,并有助于将患者分为高危组和低危组。它还可以帮助外科医生确定肝切除术的最佳候选人并加强围手术期管理。
Diagnostic Performance of SWE and Predictive Models Based on SWE for Post- Hepatectomy Liver Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Background: Post-hepatic resection liver failure (PHLF) remains one of the most serious complications after hepatic resection, with an overall morbidity rate as high as 32% and an approximate 5% mortality. Previous studies demonstrate the potential of shear wave elastography (SWE) to predict PHLF. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of SWE in identifying liver failure after hepatectomy.
Methods: A comprehensive search was performed across PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science to identify studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of SWE for predicting PHLF. The combined sensitivity, specificity, and the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve (HSROC) for SWE in detecting PHLF in liver resection patients. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool was used to evaluate the quality of the studies included in the analysis. Heterogeneity was explored through sensitivity analysis, univariable meta-regression and subgroup analysis.
Results: This meta-analysis included a total of 13 studies involving 2985 patients. For quantitative analysis. The combined sensitivities and specificities of SWE for detecting post-hepatectomy liver failure were 0.81 and 0.68, respectively. The HSROC value for SWE was 0.82. Significant heterogeneity (I2 = 80.22) was observed in pooled specificity. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses suggest that differences in the proportion of patients with HCC and in the diagnostic criteria for PHLF may account for the observed heterogeneity. For the qualitative analysis, six predictive models based on SWE were included, and their AUCs were 0.80-0.915.
Conclusion: Both SWE alone and SWE-based prediction models appear to accurately detect PHLF and help to categorize patients into high- and low-risk groups. It may also assist surgeons in identifying the best candidates for liver resection and enhancing perioperative management.
期刊介绍:
Current Medical Imaging Reviews publishes frontier review articles, original research articles, drug clinical trial studies and guest edited thematic issues on all the latest advances on medical imaging dedicated to clinical research. All relevant areas are covered by the journal, including advances in the diagnosis, instrumentation and therapeutic applications related to all modern medical imaging techniques.
The journal is essential reading for all clinicians and researchers involved in medical imaging and diagnosis.