基于随机测试的能力评估:一种新的结构化评估方法的可行性。

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Physiology Education Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-03 DOI:10.1152/advan.00111.2025
M Jawad Hashim, Alexander Kieu
{"title":"基于随机测试的能力评估:一种新的结构化评估方法的可行性。","authors":"M Jawad Hashim, Alexander Kieu","doi":"10.1152/advan.00111.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assessing the clinical competence of health care students is challenging as it involves direct observation of practical performance. We evaluated the effectiveness of a new format for assessing practical skills: competency evaluation using randomized testing (CERT). CERT is a structured assessment format that uses random variants within each station. CERT is designed to be authentic, learner centered, and competency oriented. We conducted a controlled trial of CERT among final-year medical students in a clinical clerkship. There were 33 medical students in the intervention (CERT) group and 33 in the control group. The CERT sessions included six stations, each using variations to protect the integrity of exam content. Each of the six stations had four variants, which were randomly assigned to students. Scores were adjusted based on the difficulty level of each variant. The primary outcome measure was performance on a standardized posttest. Learning scores were higher in the intervention group [mean National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) adjusted scores: 72.9 vs. 61.1 in control group; <i>P</i> < 0.001]. Students who entered the session later did not have higher scores compared to those who finished earlier. Scores from the new format correlated with NBME marks. The new format was rated highly by medical students. CERT, a structured assessment using randomized variations in stations, is a feasible and potentially valid format for evaluating clinical competence. By using random variations, CERT protects the integrity of assessment, allows flexible scheduling, and facilitates assessment of a large number of candidates.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Competency evaluation using randomized testing (CERT) is a new format for assessing practical skills. It uses random variations to protect the integrity of the examination content. This allows candidates to be scheduled individually without having to keep them in a waiting room. We evaluated the feasibility of CERT at a medical college and found that it led to improved learning outcomes and high satisfaction ratings. CERT facilitates the assessment of clinical competencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50852,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Physiology Education","volume":" ","pages":"801-806"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competency evaluation using randomized testing: feasibility of a new structured assessment method.\",\"authors\":\"M Jawad Hashim, Alexander Kieu\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/advan.00111.2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Assessing the clinical competence of health care students is challenging as it involves direct observation of practical performance. We evaluated the effectiveness of a new format for assessing practical skills: competency evaluation using randomized testing (CERT). CERT is a structured assessment format that uses random variants within each station. CERT is designed to be authentic, learner centered, and competency oriented. We conducted a controlled trial of CERT among final-year medical students in a clinical clerkship. There were 33 medical students in the intervention (CERT) group and 33 in the control group. The CERT sessions included six stations, each using variations to protect the integrity of exam content. Each of the six stations had four variants, which were randomly assigned to students. Scores were adjusted based on the difficulty level of each variant. The primary outcome measure was performance on a standardized posttest. Learning scores were higher in the intervention group [mean National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) adjusted scores: 72.9 vs. 61.1 in control group; <i>P</i> < 0.001]. Students who entered the session later did not have higher scores compared to those who finished earlier. Scores from the new format correlated with NBME marks. The new format was rated highly by medical students. CERT, a structured assessment using randomized variations in stations, is a feasible and potentially valid format for evaluating clinical competence. By using random variations, CERT protects the integrity of assessment, allows flexible scheduling, and facilitates assessment of a large number of candidates.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Competency evaluation using randomized testing (CERT) is a new format for assessing practical skills. It uses random variations to protect the integrity of the examination content. This allows candidates to be scheduled individually without having to keep them in a waiting room. We evaluated the feasibility of CERT at a medical college and found that it led to improved learning outcomes and high satisfaction ratings. CERT facilitates the assessment of clinical competencies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Physiology Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"801-806\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Physiology Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00111.2025\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Physiology Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00111.2025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估卫生保健学生的临床能力是具有挑战性的,因为它涉及到实际表现的直接观察。我们评估了一种评估实用技能的新格式的有效性:使用随机测试(CERT)的能力评估。CERT是一种结构化的评估格式,在每个站点中使用随机变量。模拟临床环境,CERT的设计是真实的,以学习者为中心,并以能力为导向。我们在临床实习的医学生中进行了一项计算机应急响应的对照试验。干预组33名,对照组33名。CERT会议包括六个站点,每个站点使用不同的方法来保护考试内容的完整性。六个站点中的每一个都有四个随机分配给学生的变体。分数根据每个变体的难度进行调整。主要结局指标是标准化后测的表现。干预组的学习分数更高(国家医学检验委员会[NBME]调整后的平均分数:72.9比61.1;P < 0.001)。较晚参加测试的学生与较早完成测试的学生相比,得分并不高。新格式的分数与NBME分数相关。新格式得到了医学生的高度评价。CERT是一种结构化的评估,使用随机变化的站点,是评估临床能力的可行和潜在有效的格式。通过使用随机变量,CERT保护了评估的完整性,允许灵活的调度,并促进了对大量候选对象的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Competency evaluation using randomized testing: feasibility of a new structured assessment method.

Assessing the clinical competence of health care students is challenging as it involves direct observation of practical performance. We evaluated the effectiveness of a new format for assessing practical skills: competency evaluation using randomized testing (CERT). CERT is a structured assessment format that uses random variants within each station. CERT is designed to be authentic, learner centered, and competency oriented. We conducted a controlled trial of CERT among final-year medical students in a clinical clerkship. There were 33 medical students in the intervention (CERT) group and 33 in the control group. The CERT sessions included six stations, each using variations to protect the integrity of exam content. Each of the six stations had four variants, which were randomly assigned to students. Scores were adjusted based on the difficulty level of each variant. The primary outcome measure was performance on a standardized posttest. Learning scores were higher in the intervention group [mean National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) adjusted scores: 72.9 vs. 61.1 in control group; P < 0.001]. Students who entered the session later did not have higher scores compared to those who finished earlier. Scores from the new format correlated with NBME marks. The new format was rated highly by medical students. CERT, a structured assessment using randomized variations in stations, is a feasible and potentially valid format for evaluating clinical competence. By using random variations, CERT protects the integrity of assessment, allows flexible scheduling, and facilitates assessment of a large number of candidates.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Competency evaluation using randomized testing (CERT) is a new format for assessing practical skills. It uses random variations to protect the integrity of the examination content. This allows candidates to be scheduled individually without having to keep them in a waiting room. We evaluated the feasibility of CERT at a medical college and found that it led to improved learning outcomes and high satisfaction ratings. CERT facilitates the assessment of clinical competencies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
19.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Physiology Education promotes and disseminates educational scholarship in order to enhance teaching and learning of physiology, neuroscience and pathophysiology. The journal publishes peer-reviewed descriptions of innovations that improve teaching in the classroom and laboratory, essays on education, and review articles based on our current understanding of physiological mechanisms. Submissions that evaluate new technologies for teaching and research, and educational pedagogy, are especially welcome. The audience for the journal includes educators at all levels: K–12, undergraduate, graduate, and professional programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信