ChatGPT在口腔大学教育中的应用。系统评价。

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Juan Ignacio Aura-Tormos, Maria Llacer-Martinez, Ines Torres-Osca
{"title":"ChatGPT在口腔大学教育中的应用。系统评价。","authors":"Juan Ignacio Aura-Tormos, Maria Llacer-Martinez, Ines Torres-Osca","doi":"10.1111/eje.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The emergence of ChatGPT has sparked growing interest in its application within university-based dental education. As a conversational large language model (LLM), ChatGPT offers unique opportunities for content explanation, exam simulation and learner support. However, its educational utility, limitations and ethical implications remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aims to synthesise existing evidence on the pedagogical uses, perceived benefits, limitations and curricular integration of ChatGPT in dental education at the undergraduate and postgraduate levels.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. After screening and applying eligibility criteria, studies which met the eligibility criteria were included for full analysis. Thematic synthesis was performed across six domains: perceptions, educational uses, perceived benefits, risks and limitations, curricular integration and model comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After completing the database search, 60 studies were identified. ChatGPT was predominantly perceived as useful, especially in enhancing autonomous learning, exam preparation and understanding clinical concepts. Most studies highlighted GPT-4's superior performance compared to GPT-3.5. Nevertheless, concerns regarding misinformation, overreliance and reduced critical thinking were frequently reported. Integration into curricula remained informal and complementary, with limited structured implementation. Study quality was heterogeneous, and many reports lacked methodological transparency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ChatGPT shows promise as a supportive tool in dental education, but its integration requires ethical and pedagogical oversight. Future research should use standardised frameworks to assess its effectiveness and risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":50488,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dental Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Educational Applications of ChatGPT in University-Based Dental Education. A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Juan Ignacio Aura-Tormos, Maria Llacer-Martinez, Ines Torres-Osca\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eje.70011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The emergence of ChatGPT has sparked growing interest in its application within university-based dental education. As a conversational large language model (LLM), ChatGPT offers unique opportunities for content explanation, exam simulation and learner support. However, its educational utility, limitations and ethical implications remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aims to synthesise existing evidence on the pedagogical uses, perceived benefits, limitations and curricular integration of ChatGPT in dental education at the undergraduate and postgraduate levels.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. After screening and applying eligibility criteria, studies which met the eligibility criteria were included for full analysis. Thematic synthesis was performed across six domains: perceptions, educational uses, perceived benefits, risks and limitations, curricular integration and model comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After completing the database search, 60 studies were identified. ChatGPT was predominantly perceived as useful, especially in enhancing autonomous learning, exam preparation and understanding clinical concepts. Most studies highlighted GPT-4's superior performance compared to GPT-3.5. Nevertheless, concerns regarding misinformation, overreliance and reduced critical thinking were frequently reported. Integration into curricula remained informal and complementary, with limited structured implementation. Study quality was heterogeneous, and many reports lacked methodological transparency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ChatGPT shows promise as a supportive tool in dental education, but its integration requires ethical and pedagogical oversight. Future research should use standardised frameworks to assess its effectiveness and risks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Dental Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Dental Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.70011\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.70011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:ChatGPT的出现引发了人们对其在大学牙科教育中的应用越来越感兴趣。ChatGPT作为一种会话式大型语言模型(LLM),为内容解释、考试模拟和学习者支持提供了独特的机会。然而,它的教育效用、局限性和伦理意义仍未得到充分探讨。目的:本系统综述旨在综合现有证据的教学用途,感知的好处,局限性和课程整合ChatGPT在牙科教育在本科和研究生水平。材料和方法:在PubMed, Scopus和Web of Science上进行了全面的搜索。在筛选和应用资格标准后,符合资格标准的研究被纳入全面分析。主题综合在六个领域进行:感知、教育用途、感知利益、风险和限制、课程整合和模式比较。结果:完成数据库检索后,共发现60项研究。ChatGPT主要被认为是有用的,特别是在增强自主学习,考试准备和理解临床概念方面。大多数研究都强调了GPT-4与GPT-3.5相比的优越性能。然而,对错误信息、过度依赖和批判性思维减少的担忧经常被报道。与课程的结合仍然是非正式的和补充性的,有组织的执行有限。研究质量参差不齐,许多报告缺乏方法学的透明度。结论:ChatGPT显示了作为牙科教育辅助工具的前景,但其整合需要伦理和教学监督。未来的研究应该使用标准化的框架来评估其有效性和风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Educational Applications of ChatGPT in University-Based Dental Education. A Systematic Review.

Background: The emergence of ChatGPT has sparked growing interest in its application within university-based dental education. As a conversational large language model (LLM), ChatGPT offers unique opportunities for content explanation, exam simulation and learner support. However, its educational utility, limitations and ethical implications remain underexplored.

Objective: This systematic review aims to synthesise existing evidence on the pedagogical uses, perceived benefits, limitations and curricular integration of ChatGPT in dental education at the undergraduate and postgraduate levels.

Material and methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. After screening and applying eligibility criteria, studies which met the eligibility criteria were included for full analysis. Thematic synthesis was performed across six domains: perceptions, educational uses, perceived benefits, risks and limitations, curricular integration and model comparison.

Results: After completing the database search, 60 studies were identified. ChatGPT was predominantly perceived as useful, especially in enhancing autonomous learning, exam preparation and understanding clinical concepts. Most studies highlighted GPT-4's superior performance compared to GPT-3.5. Nevertheless, concerns regarding misinformation, overreliance and reduced critical thinking were frequently reported. Integration into curricula remained informal and complementary, with limited structured implementation. Study quality was heterogeneous, and many reports lacked methodological transparency.

Conclusions: ChatGPT shows promise as a supportive tool in dental education, but its integration requires ethical and pedagogical oversight. Future research should use standardised frameworks to assess its effectiveness and risks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the European Journal of Dental Education is to publish original topical and review articles of the highest quality in the field of Dental Education. The Journal seeks to disseminate widely the latest information on curriculum development teaching methodologies assessment techniques and quality assurance in the fields of dental undergraduate and postgraduate education and dental auxiliary personnel training. The scope includes the dental educational aspects of the basic medical sciences the behavioural sciences the interface with medical education information technology and distance learning and educational audit. Papers embodying the results of high-quality educational research of relevance to dentistry are particularly encouraged as are evidence-based reports of novel and established educational programmes and their outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信