用多维配对偏好模型检测DIF: Lord卡方和IPR-NCDIF方法。

IF 1.2 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL
Lavanya S Kumar, Naidan Tu, Sean Joo, Stephen Stark
{"title":"用多维配对偏好模型检测DIF: Lord卡方和IPR-NCDIF方法。","authors":"Lavanya S Kumar, Naidan Tu, Sean Joo, Stephen Stark","doi":"10.1177/01466216251351949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multidimensional forced choice (MFC) measures are gaining prominence in noncognitive assessment. Yet there has been little research on detecting differential item functioning (DIF) with models for forced choice measures. This research extended two well-known DIF detection methods to MFC measures. Specifically, the performance of Lord's chi-square and item parameter replication (IPR) methods with MFC tests based on the Multi-Unidimensional Pairwise Preference (MUPP) model was investigated. The Type I error rate and power of the DIF detection methods were examined in a Monte Carlo simulation that manipulated sample size, impact, DIF source, and DIF magnitude. Both methods showed consistent power and were found to control Type I error well across study conditions, indicating that established approaches to DIF detection work well with the MUPP model. Lord's chi-square outperformed the IPR method when DIF source was statement discrimination while the opposite was true when DIF source was statement threshold. Also, both methods performed similarly and showed better power when DIF source was statement location, in line with previous research. Study implications and practical recommendations for DIF detection with MFC tests, as well as limitations, are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48300,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychological Measurement","volume":" ","pages":"01466216251351949"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12213542/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detecting DIF with the Multi-Unidimensional Pairwise Preference Model: Lord's Chi-square and IPR-NCDIF Methods.\",\"authors\":\"Lavanya S Kumar, Naidan Tu, Sean Joo, Stephen Stark\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01466216251351949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Multidimensional forced choice (MFC) measures are gaining prominence in noncognitive assessment. Yet there has been little research on detecting differential item functioning (DIF) with models for forced choice measures. This research extended two well-known DIF detection methods to MFC measures. Specifically, the performance of Lord's chi-square and item parameter replication (IPR) methods with MFC tests based on the Multi-Unidimensional Pairwise Preference (MUPP) model was investigated. The Type I error rate and power of the DIF detection methods were examined in a Monte Carlo simulation that manipulated sample size, impact, DIF source, and DIF magnitude. Both methods showed consistent power and were found to control Type I error well across study conditions, indicating that established approaches to DIF detection work well with the MUPP model. Lord's chi-square outperformed the IPR method when DIF source was statement discrimination while the opposite was true when DIF source was statement threshold. Also, both methods performed similarly and showed better power when DIF source was statement location, in line with previous research. Study implications and practical recommendations for DIF detection with MFC tests, as well as limitations, are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Psychological Measurement\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"01466216251351949\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12213542/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Psychological Measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216251351949\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychological Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216251351949","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多维强迫选择(MFC)方法在非认知评估中越来越受到重视。然而,利用强迫选择测量模型检测差异项目功能(DIF)的研究很少。本研究将两种著名的DIF检测方法扩展到MFC测量中。具体而言,研究了基于多维成对偏好(MUPP)模型的MFC检验的Lord’s卡方和项目参数复制(IPR)方法的性能。在蒙特卡罗模拟中检验了I型错误率和DIF检测方法的功率,该模拟控制了样本量、影响、DIF源和DIF幅度。两种方法都显示出一致的效果,并且在不同的研究条件下都能很好地控制I型误差,这表明已建立的DIF检测方法与MUPP模型一起工作得很好。当DIF源为语句判别时,Lord卡方法优于IPR法;当DIF源为语句阈值时,Lord卡方法优于IPR法。此外,当DIF源为语句位置时,两种方法的性能相似,并且表现出更好的能力,这与先前的研究一致。本文讨论了用MFC检测DIF的研究意义和实际建议,以及局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detecting DIF with the Multi-Unidimensional Pairwise Preference Model: Lord's Chi-square and IPR-NCDIF Methods.

Multidimensional forced choice (MFC) measures are gaining prominence in noncognitive assessment. Yet there has been little research on detecting differential item functioning (DIF) with models for forced choice measures. This research extended two well-known DIF detection methods to MFC measures. Specifically, the performance of Lord's chi-square and item parameter replication (IPR) methods with MFC tests based on the Multi-Unidimensional Pairwise Preference (MUPP) model was investigated. The Type I error rate and power of the DIF detection methods were examined in a Monte Carlo simulation that manipulated sample size, impact, DIF source, and DIF magnitude. Both methods showed consistent power and were found to control Type I error well across study conditions, indicating that established approaches to DIF detection work well with the MUPP model. Lord's chi-square outperformed the IPR method when DIF source was statement discrimination while the opposite was true when DIF source was statement threshold. Also, both methods performed similarly and showed better power when DIF source was statement location, in line with previous research. Study implications and practical recommendations for DIF detection with MFC tests, as well as limitations, are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Applied Psychological Measurement publishes empirical research on the application of techniques of psychological measurement to substantive problems in all areas of psychology and related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信