加拿大多伦多因吸入气体导致的自杀死亡——1998年至2020年新兴自杀方法的观察性研究。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Vera Yu Men, Prudence Po Ming Chan, Ayal Schaffer, Rosalie Steinberg, Rachel Mitchell, Jennifer M Dmetrichuk, Paul Siu Fai Yip, Simon Hatcher, Mark Sinyor
{"title":"加拿大多伦多因吸入气体导致的自杀死亡——1998年至2020年新兴自杀方法的观察性研究。","authors":"Vera Yu Men, Prudence Po Ming Chan, Ayal Schaffer, Rosalie Steinberg, Rachel Mitchell, Jennifer M Dmetrichuk, Paul Siu Fai Yip, Simon Hatcher, Mark Sinyor","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a001015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Inert gases are an emerging means of suicide in Toronto, Canada. Trends in suicide by these methods change over time, yet long-term patterns remain uncharacterized in cities like Toronto. <i>Aims:</i> To update trends in suicide using inhalational gas and explore the profiles of individuals using different methods in Toronto. <i>Methods:</i> Suicide deaths were identified from coroner's records and classified by suicide methods. Time trends were explored, and bivariate analyses were performed to characterize differences in profiles between groups. <i>Results:</i> There were 229 suicide deaths by inert gas between 1998 and 2020. For 2016-2020, suicide by nitrogen increased by 100%, whereas there was a decrease in suicide by helium (-38%) and charcoal burning (-57%) compared to 2011-2015. Males comprised a higher proportion of inhalational gas deaths compared to other methods. Individuals who died by compressed gas and charcoal burning were more likely to have left suicide notes compared to people who died by other methods. <i>Limitations:</i> The number of suicide deaths by gas inhalation may be underestimated due to potential misclassification. <i>Conclusions:</i> Suicide prevention strategies including restricting access to suicidal means, providing helpline information on the products, and responsible media reporting should each be advocated for.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suicide Deaths by Gas Inhalation in Toronto, Canada - An Observational Study of Emerging Methods of Suicide From 1998 to 2020.\",\"authors\":\"Vera Yu Men, Prudence Po Ming Chan, Ayal Schaffer, Rosalie Steinberg, Rachel Mitchell, Jennifer M Dmetrichuk, Paul Siu Fai Yip, Simon Hatcher, Mark Sinyor\",\"doi\":\"10.1027/0227-5910/a001015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Inert gases are an emerging means of suicide in Toronto, Canada. Trends in suicide by these methods change over time, yet long-term patterns remain uncharacterized in cities like Toronto. <i>Aims:</i> To update trends in suicide using inhalational gas and explore the profiles of individuals using different methods in Toronto. <i>Methods:</i> Suicide deaths were identified from coroner's records and classified by suicide methods. Time trends were explored, and bivariate analyses were performed to characterize differences in profiles between groups. <i>Results:</i> There were 229 suicide deaths by inert gas between 1998 and 2020. For 2016-2020, suicide by nitrogen increased by 100%, whereas there was a decrease in suicide by helium (-38%) and charcoal burning (-57%) compared to 2011-2015. Males comprised a higher proportion of inhalational gas deaths compared to other methods. Individuals who died by compressed gas and charcoal burning were more likely to have left suicide notes compared to people who died by other methods. <i>Limitations:</i> The number of suicide deaths by gas inhalation may be underestimated due to potential misclassification. <i>Conclusions:</i> Suicide prevention strategies including restricting access to suicidal means, providing helpline information on the products, and responsible media reporting should each be advocated for.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a001015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a001015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在加拿大多伦多,惰性气体是一种新兴的自杀方式。用这些方法自杀的趋势随着时间的推移而改变,但在多伦多等城市,长期模式仍然没有特征。目的:更新使用吸入气体自杀的趋势,并探讨多伦多使用不同方法的个人概况。方法:从验尸官记录中确定自杀死亡,并按自杀方式分类。研究了时间趋势,并进行了双变量分析,以表征组间概况的差异。结果:1998年至2020年共有229例惰性气体自杀。与2011-2015年相比,2016-2020年,用氮气自杀的人数增加了100%,而用氦气自杀的人数减少了38%,用木炭自杀的人数减少了57%。与其他方法相比,男性在吸入性气体死亡中所占比例更高。与其他方式死亡的人相比,死于压缩气体和木炭燃烧的人更有可能留下遗书。局限性:由于潜在的错误分类,吸入气体自杀死亡的人数可能被低估。结论:预防自杀的策略包括限制自杀手段的获取,提供产品的求助热线信息,以及负责任的媒体报道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Suicide Deaths by Gas Inhalation in Toronto, Canada - An Observational Study of Emerging Methods of Suicide From 1998 to 2020.

Background: Inert gases are an emerging means of suicide in Toronto, Canada. Trends in suicide by these methods change over time, yet long-term patterns remain uncharacterized in cities like Toronto. Aims: To update trends in suicide using inhalational gas and explore the profiles of individuals using different methods in Toronto. Methods: Suicide deaths were identified from coroner's records and classified by suicide methods. Time trends were explored, and bivariate analyses were performed to characterize differences in profiles between groups. Results: There were 229 suicide deaths by inert gas between 1998 and 2020. For 2016-2020, suicide by nitrogen increased by 100%, whereas there was a decrease in suicide by helium (-38%) and charcoal burning (-57%) compared to 2011-2015. Males comprised a higher proportion of inhalational gas deaths compared to other methods. Individuals who died by compressed gas and charcoal burning were more likely to have left suicide notes compared to people who died by other methods. Limitations: The number of suicide deaths by gas inhalation may be underestimated due to potential misclassification. Conclusions: Suicide prevention strategies including restricting access to suicidal means, providing helpline information on the products, and responsible media reporting should each be advocated for.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: A must for all who need to keep up on the latest findings from both basic research and practical experience in the fields of suicide prevention and crisis intervention! This well-established periodical’s reputation for publishing important articles on suicidology and crisis intervention from around the world is being further enhanced with the move to 6 issues per year (previously 4) in 2010. But over and above its scientific reputation, Crisis also publishes potentially life-saving information for all those involved in crisis intervention and suicide prevention, making it important reading for clinicians, counselors, hotlines, and crisis intervention centers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信