{"title":"采用阴道自然口腔内内窥镜手术降低风险的输卵管卵巢切除术妇女生殖系BRCA1/2致病变异分析从传统程序。","authors":"Hidetaka Nomura, Akiko Abe, Atsushi Fusegi, Mayumi Kamata, Arisa Ueki, Hiroyuki Kanao","doi":"10.5468/ogs.25044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is less invasive than conventional transabdominal laparoscopic surgery for benign gynecological indications. When adopting this procedure for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), the ventral side of the uterus becomes a blind area, which is a challenge. To clarify the effects of this blind area on the treatment outcome of HBOC, we examined the clinical data of RRSO using conventional procedures for women with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants who were treated at our institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was performed. The clinical data of patients who underwent RRSO using the conventional procedure between 2011 and July 2024 were extracted. All included patients were preoperatively examined using vaginal ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced pelvic magnetic resonance imaging, and carcinoma antigen-125 level measurements to exclude ovarian cancer development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 267 patients underwent RRSO at our institution. The mean age at RRSO was 50.1 years. Five cases of occult invasive cancer (1.9%) and 10 cases of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (3.7%) were identified postoperatively. One patient (0.37%) showed macroscopic peritoneal dissemination in the omentum. None of the 252 patients without occult cancer developed peritoneal cancer during the mean observational time of 62.4 months No patient presented with peritoneal lesions ventral to the uterus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Macroscopic tumors on the peritoneum ventral to the uterus were rare when strict preoperative screening for ovarian cancer was performed. vNOTES can be safely adopted for RRSO in patients with HBOC, without evident disadvantages.</p>","PeriodicalId":37602,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynecology Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of adopting vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for women with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants analysis from conventional procedure.\",\"authors\":\"Hidetaka Nomura, Akiko Abe, Atsushi Fusegi, Mayumi Kamata, Arisa Ueki, Hiroyuki Kanao\",\"doi\":\"10.5468/ogs.25044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is less invasive than conventional transabdominal laparoscopic surgery for benign gynecological indications. When adopting this procedure for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), the ventral side of the uterus becomes a blind area, which is a challenge. To clarify the effects of this blind area on the treatment outcome of HBOC, we examined the clinical data of RRSO using conventional procedures for women with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants who were treated at our institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was performed. The clinical data of patients who underwent RRSO using the conventional procedure between 2011 and July 2024 were extracted. All included patients were preoperatively examined using vaginal ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced pelvic magnetic resonance imaging, and carcinoma antigen-125 level measurements to exclude ovarian cancer development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 267 patients underwent RRSO at our institution. The mean age at RRSO was 50.1 years. Five cases of occult invasive cancer (1.9%) and 10 cases of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (3.7%) were identified postoperatively. One patient (0.37%) showed macroscopic peritoneal dissemination in the omentum. None of the 252 patients without occult cancer developed peritoneal cancer during the mean observational time of 62.4 months No patient presented with peritoneal lesions ventral to the uterus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Macroscopic tumors on the peritoneum ventral to the uterus were rare when strict preoperative screening for ovarian cancer was performed. vNOTES can be safely adopted for RRSO in patients with HBOC, without evident disadvantages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrics and Gynecology Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrics and Gynecology Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.25044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and Gynecology Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.25044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of adopting vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for women with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants analysis from conventional procedure.
Objective: Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is less invasive than conventional transabdominal laparoscopic surgery for benign gynecological indications. When adopting this procedure for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), the ventral side of the uterus becomes a blind area, which is a challenge. To clarify the effects of this blind area on the treatment outcome of HBOC, we examined the clinical data of RRSO using conventional procedures for women with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants who were treated at our institution.
Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed. The clinical data of patients who underwent RRSO using the conventional procedure between 2011 and July 2024 were extracted. All included patients were preoperatively examined using vaginal ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced pelvic magnetic resonance imaging, and carcinoma antigen-125 level measurements to exclude ovarian cancer development.
Results: A total of 267 patients underwent RRSO at our institution. The mean age at RRSO was 50.1 years. Five cases of occult invasive cancer (1.9%) and 10 cases of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (3.7%) were identified postoperatively. One patient (0.37%) showed macroscopic peritoneal dissemination in the omentum. None of the 252 patients without occult cancer developed peritoneal cancer during the mean observational time of 62.4 months No patient presented with peritoneal lesions ventral to the uterus.
Conclusion: Macroscopic tumors on the peritoneum ventral to the uterus were rare when strict preoperative screening for ovarian cancer was performed. vNOTES can be safely adopted for RRSO in patients with HBOC, without evident disadvantages.
期刊介绍:
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science (NLM title: Obstet Gynecol Sci) is an international peer-review journal that published basic, translational, clinical research, and clinical practice guideline to promote women’s health and prevent obstetric and gynecologic disorders. The journal has an international editorial board and is published in English on the 15th day of every other month. Submitted manuscripts should not contain previously published material and should not be under consideration for publication elsewhere. The journal has been publishing articles since 1958. The aim of the journal is to publish original articles, reviews, case reports, short communications, letters to the editor, and video articles that have the potential to change the practices in women''s health care. The journal’s main focus is the diagnosis, treatment, prediction, and prevention of obstetric and gynecologic disorders. Because the life expectancy of Korean and Asian women is increasing, the journal''s editors are particularly interested in the health of elderly women in these population groups. The journal also publishes articles about reproductive biology, stem cell research, and artificial intelligence research for women; additionally, it provides insights into the physiology and mechanisms of obstetric and gynecologic diseases.