采用阴道自然口腔内内窥镜手术降低风险的输卵管卵巢切除术妇女生殖系BRCA1/2致病变异分析从传统程序。

IF 2 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Hidetaka Nomura, Akiko Abe, Atsushi Fusegi, Mayumi Kamata, Arisa Ueki, Hiroyuki Kanao
{"title":"采用阴道自然口腔内内窥镜手术降低风险的输卵管卵巢切除术妇女生殖系BRCA1/2致病变异分析从传统程序。","authors":"Hidetaka Nomura, Akiko Abe, Atsushi Fusegi, Mayumi Kamata, Arisa Ueki, Hiroyuki Kanao","doi":"10.5468/ogs.25044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is less invasive than conventional transabdominal laparoscopic surgery for benign gynecological indications. When adopting this procedure for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), the ventral side of the uterus becomes a blind area, which is a challenge. To clarify the effects of this blind area on the treatment outcome of HBOC, we examined the clinical data of RRSO using conventional procedures for women with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants who were treated at our institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was performed. The clinical data of patients who underwent RRSO using the conventional procedure between 2011 and July 2024 were extracted. All included patients were preoperatively examined using vaginal ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced pelvic magnetic resonance imaging, and carcinoma antigen-125 level measurements to exclude ovarian cancer development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 267 patients underwent RRSO at our institution. The mean age at RRSO was 50.1 years. Five cases of occult invasive cancer (1.9%) and 10 cases of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (3.7%) were identified postoperatively. One patient (0.37%) showed macroscopic peritoneal dissemination in the omentum. None of the 252 patients without occult cancer developed peritoneal cancer during the mean observational time of 62.4 months No patient presented with peritoneal lesions ventral to the uterus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Macroscopic tumors on the peritoneum ventral to the uterus were rare when strict preoperative screening for ovarian cancer was performed. vNOTES can be safely adopted for RRSO in patients with HBOC, without evident disadvantages.</p>","PeriodicalId":37602,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynecology Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of adopting vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for women with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants analysis from conventional procedure.\",\"authors\":\"Hidetaka Nomura, Akiko Abe, Atsushi Fusegi, Mayumi Kamata, Arisa Ueki, Hiroyuki Kanao\",\"doi\":\"10.5468/ogs.25044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is less invasive than conventional transabdominal laparoscopic surgery for benign gynecological indications. When adopting this procedure for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), the ventral side of the uterus becomes a blind area, which is a challenge. To clarify the effects of this blind area on the treatment outcome of HBOC, we examined the clinical data of RRSO using conventional procedures for women with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants who were treated at our institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was performed. The clinical data of patients who underwent RRSO using the conventional procedure between 2011 and July 2024 were extracted. All included patients were preoperatively examined using vaginal ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced pelvic magnetic resonance imaging, and carcinoma antigen-125 level measurements to exclude ovarian cancer development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 267 patients underwent RRSO at our institution. The mean age at RRSO was 50.1 years. Five cases of occult invasive cancer (1.9%) and 10 cases of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (3.7%) were identified postoperatively. One patient (0.37%) showed macroscopic peritoneal dissemination in the omentum. None of the 252 patients without occult cancer developed peritoneal cancer during the mean observational time of 62.4 months No patient presented with peritoneal lesions ventral to the uterus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Macroscopic tumors on the peritoneum ventral to the uterus were rare when strict preoperative screening for ovarian cancer was performed. vNOTES can be safely adopted for RRSO in patients with HBOC, without evident disadvantages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrics and Gynecology Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrics and Gynecology Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.25044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and Gynecology Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.25044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:阴道自然腔内内镜手术(vNOTES)比传统经腹腹腔镜手术对妇科良性指征的创伤小。当遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌(HBOC)患者采用这种方法进行降低风险的输卵管卵巢切除术(RRSO)时,子宫腹侧成为盲区,这是一个挑战。为了阐明这一盲区对HBOC治疗结果的影响,我们检查了在我院接受治疗的BRCA1/2种系致病变异妇女使用常规程序进行RRSO的临床数据。方法:回顾性图表回顾。提取2011年至2024年7月间采用常规方法行RRSO患者的临床资料。所有纳入的患者术前均接受阴道超声检查、增强盆腔磁共振成像和癌抗原125水平检测,以排除卵巢癌的发展。结果:共有267名患者在我院接受了RRSO。RRSO的平均年龄为50.1岁。术后发现隐匿性浸润性癌5例(1.9%),浆液性输卵管上皮内癌10例(3.7%)。1例(0.37%)可见网膜腹膜播散。252例无隐匿性癌的患者,平均观察时间62.4个月,无一例发生腹膜癌,无一例出现子宫腹侧腹膜病变。结论:术前进行严格的卵巢癌筛查时,子宫腹膜腹侧的肉眼肿瘤是罕见的。HBOC患者可安全采用vNOTES进行RRSO治疗,无明显缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of adopting vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for women with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants analysis from conventional procedure.

Objective: Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is less invasive than conventional transabdominal laparoscopic surgery for benign gynecological indications. When adopting this procedure for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), the ventral side of the uterus becomes a blind area, which is a challenge. To clarify the effects of this blind area on the treatment outcome of HBOC, we examined the clinical data of RRSO using conventional procedures for women with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants who were treated at our institution.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed. The clinical data of patients who underwent RRSO using the conventional procedure between 2011 and July 2024 were extracted. All included patients were preoperatively examined using vaginal ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced pelvic magnetic resonance imaging, and carcinoma antigen-125 level measurements to exclude ovarian cancer development.

Results: A total of 267 patients underwent RRSO at our institution. The mean age at RRSO was 50.1 years. Five cases of occult invasive cancer (1.9%) and 10 cases of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (3.7%) were identified postoperatively. One patient (0.37%) showed macroscopic peritoneal dissemination in the omentum. None of the 252 patients without occult cancer developed peritoneal cancer during the mean observational time of 62.4 months No patient presented with peritoneal lesions ventral to the uterus.

Conclusion: Macroscopic tumors on the peritoneum ventral to the uterus were rare when strict preoperative screening for ovarian cancer was performed. vNOTES can be safely adopted for RRSO in patients with HBOC, without evident disadvantages.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obstetrics and Gynecology Science
Obstetrics and Gynecology Science Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Obstetrics & Gynecology Science (NLM title: Obstet Gynecol Sci) is an international peer-review journal that published basic, translational, clinical research, and clinical practice guideline to promote women’s health and prevent obstetric and gynecologic disorders. The journal has an international editorial board and is published in English on the 15th day of every other month. Submitted manuscripts should not contain previously published material and should not be under consideration for publication elsewhere. The journal has been publishing articles since 1958. The aim of the journal is to publish original articles, reviews, case reports, short communications, letters to the editor, and video articles that have the potential to change the practices in women''s health care. The journal’s main focus is the diagnosis, treatment, prediction, and prevention of obstetric and gynecologic disorders. Because the life expectancy of Korean and Asian women is increasing, the journal''s editors are particularly interested in the health of elderly women in these population groups. The journal also publishes articles about reproductive biology, stem cell research, and artificial intelligence research for women; additionally, it provides insights into the physiology and mechanisms of obstetric and gynecologic diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信