达拉单抗、来那度胺和地塞米松对新诊断的不适合干细胞移植的多发性骨髓瘤患者生活质量的影响。

Q4 Medicine
Zhi-Hui Li, Jin-Hui Wang, Meng-Meng Liu, Peng-Tao Xing, Yan-Ping Zhang, Xin-Rong Zhan
{"title":"达拉单抗、来那度胺和地塞米松对新诊断的不适合干细胞移植的多发性骨髓瘤患者生活质量的影响。","authors":"Zhi-Hui Li, Jin-Hui Wang, Meng-Meng Liu, Peng-Tao Xing, Yan-Ping Zhang, Xin-Rong Zhan","doi":"10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2025.03.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effect of daratumumab, lenalidomide and dexamethasone on quality of life in transplant-ineligible (TIE) patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical data of 93 TIE NDMM patients in our hospital from January 2020 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into D-Rd group (48 cases) and Rd group (45 cases) according to treatment regimen. The patients in Rd group were treated with lenalidomide and dexamethasone, while those in D-Rd group were treated with daratumumab on the basis of Rd group. The QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D VAS scores of the two groups were compared at baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 treatment cycles. The last follow-up date was June 30, 2023, and overall survival (OS) was compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up period in the D-Rd group was 21 (7-38) months, and the median OS was 34 months, while that in the Rd group was 16 (5-35) months, and the median OS was 28 months. There was significant difference in OS between the two groups ( <i>P</i> <0.05). After 3, 6 and 12 treatment cycles, the QLQ-C30 score and EQ-5D VAS score of the two groups were significantly improved (all <i>P</i> <0.05). After 3 and 12 treatment cycles, the QLQ-C30 score and EQ-5D VAS score of D-Rd group were significantly higher than those of Rd group (all <i>P</i> <0.05). There were no significant differences in the improvement of QLQ-C30 GHS and pain scores between the two groups of patients with age <75 years and ECOG 0-1 score after 3, 6 and 12 treatment cycles (<i>P</i> >0.05). In D-Rd group of patients with age≥75 years, the improvement of QLQ-C30 GHS scores after 3 and 12 treatment cycles and QLQ-C30 pain scores after 3, 6 and 12 treatment cycles was significantly superior to that in Rd group (all <i>P</i> <0.05). In D-Rd group of patients with ECOG 2 scores, the improvement of QLQ-C30 GHS and pain scores after 3, 6 and 12 treatment cycles was significantly superior to that in Rd group (all <i>P</i> <0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone can significantly improve OS in TIE NDMM patients without decrease of quality of life, especially in those with age≥75 years or ECOG 2 scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":35777,"journal":{"name":"中国实验血液学杂志","volume":"33 3","pages":"816-821"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Effect of Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone on Quality of Life in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Ineligible for Stem Cell Transplantation].\",\"authors\":\"Zhi-Hui Li, Jin-Hui Wang, Meng-Meng Liu, Peng-Tao Xing, Yan-Ping Zhang, Xin-Rong Zhan\",\"doi\":\"10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2025.03.028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effect of daratumumab, lenalidomide and dexamethasone on quality of life in transplant-ineligible (TIE) patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical data of 93 TIE NDMM patients in our hospital from January 2020 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into D-Rd group (48 cases) and Rd group (45 cases) according to treatment regimen. The patients in Rd group were treated with lenalidomide and dexamethasone, while those in D-Rd group were treated with daratumumab on the basis of Rd group. The QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D VAS scores of the two groups were compared at baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 treatment cycles. The last follow-up date was June 30, 2023, and overall survival (OS) was compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up period in the D-Rd group was 21 (7-38) months, and the median OS was 34 months, while that in the Rd group was 16 (5-35) months, and the median OS was 28 months. There was significant difference in OS between the two groups ( <i>P</i> <0.05). After 3, 6 and 12 treatment cycles, the QLQ-C30 score and EQ-5D VAS score of the two groups were significantly improved (all <i>P</i> <0.05). After 3 and 12 treatment cycles, the QLQ-C30 score and EQ-5D VAS score of D-Rd group were significantly higher than those of Rd group (all <i>P</i> <0.05). There were no significant differences in the improvement of QLQ-C30 GHS and pain scores between the two groups of patients with age <75 years and ECOG 0-1 score after 3, 6 and 12 treatment cycles (<i>P</i> >0.05). In D-Rd group of patients with age≥75 years, the improvement of QLQ-C30 GHS scores after 3 and 12 treatment cycles and QLQ-C30 pain scores after 3, 6 and 12 treatment cycles was significantly superior to that in Rd group (all <i>P</i> <0.05). In D-Rd group of patients with ECOG 2 scores, the improvement of QLQ-C30 GHS and pain scores after 3, 6 and 12 treatment cycles was significantly superior to that in Rd group (all <i>P</i> <0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone can significantly improve OS in TIE NDMM patients without decrease of quality of life, especially in those with age≥75 years or ECOG 2 scores.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国实验血液学杂志\",\"volume\":\"33 3\",\"pages\":\"816-821\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国实验血液学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2025.03.028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国实验血液学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2025.03.028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨达拉单抗、来那度胺和地塞米松对新诊断的移植不合格(TIE)多发性骨髓瘤(NDMM)患者生活质量的影响。方法:回顾性分析我院2020年1月至2022年12月93例TIE NDMM患者的临床资料。根据治疗方案分为D-Rd组(48例)和Rd组(45例)。Rd组患者采用来那度胺+地塞米松治疗,D-Rd组患者在Rd组的基础上采用达拉单抗治疗。比较两组患者在基线及治疗3、6、12个疗程后的QLQ-C30、EQ-5D VAS评分。最后一次随访日期为2023年6月30日,比较两组患者的总生存期(OS)。结果:D-Rd组中位随访时间为21(7-38)个月,中位生存期为34个月;Rd组中位随访时间为16(5-35)个月,中位生存期为28个月。两组患者OS差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。在年龄≥75岁的D-Rd组患者中,3、12个治疗周期后QLQ-C30 GHS评分的改善以及3、6、12个治疗周期后QLQ-C30疼痛评分的改善均显著优于Rd组(均P P)结论:达拉单抗、来那度胺和地塞米松可显著改善TIE NDMM患者的OS,且不降低生活质量,尤其是年龄≥75岁或ECOG 2评分的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Effect of Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone on Quality of Life in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Ineligible for Stem Cell Transplantation].

Objective: To investigate the effect of daratumumab, lenalidomide and dexamethasone on quality of life in transplant-ineligible (TIE) patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM).

Methods: The clinical data of 93 TIE NDMM patients in our hospital from January 2020 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into D-Rd group (48 cases) and Rd group (45 cases) according to treatment regimen. The patients in Rd group were treated with lenalidomide and dexamethasone, while those in D-Rd group were treated with daratumumab on the basis of Rd group. The QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D VAS scores of the two groups were compared at baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 treatment cycles. The last follow-up date was June 30, 2023, and overall survival (OS) was compared between the two groups.

Results: The median follow-up period in the D-Rd group was 21 (7-38) months, and the median OS was 34 months, while that in the Rd group was 16 (5-35) months, and the median OS was 28 months. There was significant difference in OS between the two groups ( P <0.05). After 3, 6 and 12 treatment cycles, the QLQ-C30 score and EQ-5D VAS score of the two groups were significantly improved (all P <0.05). After 3 and 12 treatment cycles, the QLQ-C30 score and EQ-5D VAS score of D-Rd group were significantly higher than those of Rd group (all P <0.05). There were no significant differences in the improvement of QLQ-C30 GHS and pain scores between the two groups of patients with age <75 years and ECOG 0-1 score after 3, 6 and 12 treatment cycles (P >0.05). In D-Rd group of patients with age≥75 years, the improvement of QLQ-C30 GHS scores after 3 and 12 treatment cycles and QLQ-C30 pain scores after 3, 6 and 12 treatment cycles was significantly superior to that in Rd group (all P <0.05). In D-Rd group of patients with ECOG 2 scores, the improvement of QLQ-C30 GHS and pain scores after 3, 6 and 12 treatment cycles was significantly superior to that in Rd group (all P <0.05).

Conclusion: Daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone can significantly improve OS in TIE NDMM patients without decrease of quality of life, especially in those with age≥75 years or ECOG 2 scores.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中国实验血液学杂志
中国实验血液学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7331
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信