Jack C Millot, Adithya Balasubramanian, Lauren Chew, Gal Wald, Camilo Arenas-Gallo, Edward Zhang, Jacob McCann, Leo D Dreyfuss, Stephen Rhodes, Patrick Lewicki, Angela Y Jia, Nicholas G Zaorsky, Jonathan E Shoag
{"title":"前列腺癌放疗中直肠间隔剂的使用、急性并发症和治疗延迟。","authors":"Jack C Millot, Adithya Balasubramanian, Lauren Chew, Gal Wald, Camilo Arenas-Gallo, Edward Zhang, Jacob McCann, Leo D Dreyfuss, Stephen Rhodes, Patrick Lewicki, Angela Y Jia, Nicholas G Zaorsky, Jonathan E Shoag","doi":"10.1016/j.urology.2025.06.070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate rectal hydrogel spacer use, placement complications, and associated radiation delays in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Merative<sup>TM</sup> MarketScan Database was used to identify prostate cancer patients undergoing spacer placement or radiation alone between 2016 and 2021. Genitourinary and gastrointestinal complications and subsequent interventions that occurred after spacer placement but before radiation were captured. A 6-month window preceding spacer placement was employed to eliminate underlying diagnoses present before spacer placement. Delays in starting radiation after spacer placement were identified and categorized as more than one, two, or three months. A Cox proportional hazards model with a time-varying covariate of acute complications to assess the effect of complications on time-to-radiation RESULTS: We captured 3,732 spacer placements, of which 3,650 (97.8%) underwent radiation. The use of spacers among prostate cancer radiation patients increased from 0.5% in 2016 to 25.7% in 2021. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) patients had the highest spacer use at 50.0% in 2021. Complications occurred in 6.4% (n=235) of patients before starting radiation. Of these, 5.2% (n=190) were genitourinary and 1.2% (n=43) were gastrointestinal complications. Catheterization, cystoscopy, rectal endoscopy, rectal abscess drainage were required for 21 (0.6%), 15 (0.4%), 12 (0.3%), 1 (0.03%), and 1 (0.03%) patients, respectively. Following a complication, patients had a significantly lower risk (Hazard Ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.66 - 0.86, p<0.001) of starting radiation compared to before the complication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rectal spacer use is prevalent amongst patients undergoing SBRT. While rare, spacer placement complications occur, which can delay the start of radiation therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23415,"journal":{"name":"Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilization, Acute Complications, and Delays in Treatment Associated with Rectal Spacers for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Jack C Millot, Adithya Balasubramanian, Lauren Chew, Gal Wald, Camilo Arenas-Gallo, Edward Zhang, Jacob McCann, Leo D Dreyfuss, Stephen Rhodes, Patrick Lewicki, Angela Y Jia, Nicholas G Zaorsky, Jonathan E Shoag\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urology.2025.06.070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate rectal hydrogel spacer use, placement complications, and associated radiation delays in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Merative<sup>TM</sup> MarketScan Database was used to identify prostate cancer patients undergoing spacer placement or radiation alone between 2016 and 2021. Genitourinary and gastrointestinal complications and subsequent interventions that occurred after spacer placement but before radiation were captured. A 6-month window preceding spacer placement was employed to eliminate underlying diagnoses present before spacer placement. Delays in starting radiation after spacer placement were identified and categorized as more than one, two, or three months. A Cox proportional hazards model with a time-varying covariate of acute complications to assess the effect of complications on time-to-radiation RESULTS: We captured 3,732 spacer placements, of which 3,650 (97.8%) underwent radiation. The use of spacers among prostate cancer radiation patients increased from 0.5% in 2016 to 25.7% in 2021. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) patients had the highest spacer use at 50.0% in 2021. Complications occurred in 6.4% (n=235) of patients before starting radiation. Of these, 5.2% (n=190) were genitourinary and 1.2% (n=43) were gastrointestinal complications. Catheterization, cystoscopy, rectal endoscopy, rectal abscess drainage were required for 21 (0.6%), 15 (0.4%), 12 (0.3%), 1 (0.03%), and 1 (0.03%) patients, respectively. Following a complication, patients had a significantly lower risk (Hazard Ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.66 - 0.86, p<0.001) of starting radiation compared to before the complication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rectal spacer use is prevalent amongst patients undergoing SBRT. While rare, spacer placement complications occur, which can delay the start of radiation therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2025.06.070\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2025.06.070","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:调查美国直肠水凝胶间隔剂的使用、放置并发症和相关的放射延迟。方法:使用MerativeTM MarketScan数据库识别2016年至2021年间接受间隔器放置或单独放疗的前列腺癌患者。泌尿生殖系统和胃肠道并发症和随后的干预发生间隔放置后,但在辐射之前被捕获。放置间隔剂前的6个月窗口期用于消除放置间隔剂前存在的潜在诊断。安置间隔器后开始辐射的延迟被确定并归类为超过一个月、两个月或三个月。采用具有急性并发症时变协变量的Cox比例风险模型来评估并发症对放射时间的影响。结果:我们捕获了3,732个间隔器放置,其中3,650(97.8%)接受了放射治疗。前列腺癌放疗患者使用间隔器的比例从2016年的0.5%上升到2021年的25.7%。立体定向体放疗(SBRT)患者在2021年使用间隔剂的比例最高,为50.0%。放疗前出现并发症的患者占6.4% (n=235)。其中,5.2% (n=190)为泌尿生殖系统并发症,1.2% (n=43)为胃肠道并发症。插管21例(0.6%),膀胱镜检查15例(0.4%),直肠内镜检查12例(0.3%),1例(0.03%),1例(0.03%)。并发症发生后,患者的风险显著降低(危险比0.75,95% CI 0.66 - 0.86)。结论:直肠间隔器在接受SBRT的患者中普遍使用。虽然罕见,但间隔器放置并发症会发生,这可能会延迟放射治疗的开始。
Utilization, Acute Complications, and Delays in Treatment Associated with Rectal Spacers for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy.
Objective: To investigate rectal hydrogel spacer use, placement complications, and associated radiation delays in the United States.
Methods: The MerativeTM MarketScan Database was used to identify prostate cancer patients undergoing spacer placement or radiation alone between 2016 and 2021. Genitourinary and gastrointestinal complications and subsequent interventions that occurred after spacer placement but before radiation were captured. A 6-month window preceding spacer placement was employed to eliminate underlying diagnoses present before spacer placement. Delays in starting radiation after spacer placement were identified and categorized as more than one, two, or three months. A Cox proportional hazards model with a time-varying covariate of acute complications to assess the effect of complications on time-to-radiation RESULTS: We captured 3,732 spacer placements, of which 3,650 (97.8%) underwent radiation. The use of spacers among prostate cancer radiation patients increased from 0.5% in 2016 to 25.7% in 2021. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) patients had the highest spacer use at 50.0% in 2021. Complications occurred in 6.4% (n=235) of patients before starting radiation. Of these, 5.2% (n=190) were genitourinary and 1.2% (n=43) were gastrointestinal complications. Catheterization, cystoscopy, rectal endoscopy, rectal abscess drainage were required for 21 (0.6%), 15 (0.4%), 12 (0.3%), 1 (0.03%), and 1 (0.03%) patients, respectively. Following a complication, patients had a significantly lower risk (Hazard Ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.66 - 0.86, p<0.001) of starting radiation compared to before the complication.
Conclusions: Rectal spacer use is prevalent amongst patients undergoing SBRT. While rare, spacer placement complications occur, which can delay the start of radiation therapy.
期刊介绍:
Urology is a monthly, peer–reviewed journal primarily for urologists, residents, interns, nephrologists, and other specialists interested in urology
The mission of Urology®, the "Gold Journal," is to provide practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science information to physicians and researchers practicing the art of urology worldwide. Urology® publishes original articles relating to adult and pediatric clinical urology as well as to clinical and basic science research. Topics in Urology® include pediatrics, surgical oncology, radiology, pathology, erectile dysfunction, infertility, incontinence, transplantation, endourology, andrology, female urology, reconstructive surgery, and medical oncology, as well as relevant basic science issues. Special features include rapid communication of important timely issues, surgeon''s workshops, interesting case reports, surgical techniques, clinical and basic science review articles, guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, and historical articles in urology.