{"title":"埃塞俄比亚卫生专业人员的数据管理实践:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Mequannent Sharew Melaku, Bedilu Geremew, Tesema Zewdu, Zemenu Molla, Rukya Yassin, Agmasie Damtew Walle, Lamrot Yohannes","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02851-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A global focus is producing high-quality data for use in decision-making at all levels of the health system. Healthcare professionals' data handling techniques have been the subject of numerous research, yet the findings have been wildly inconsistent in Ethiopia. This inconsistency has not been thoroughly examined, leaving a gap in reliable evidence regarding the overall magnitude of effective data management practices within the healthcare system of Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review aimed to determine the pooled magnitude of data management practices amid healthcare professionals in Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a search strategy and conducted a comprehensive search across PubMed, Web of Science, African journals of online, Ethiopian journal of health science, Scopus, Medline, Embase, WHO Global Health Library, Google Scholar, Scopus, HINARI, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant studies between October 10 and November 10, 2024. The Joanna Briggs Institute quality assessment methodology, which has nine categories, was used to evaluate each study's quality. Microsoft Excel version 2019 and Stata software was used to extract and analyzes the data. We calculated total heterogeneity across studies using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic and estimated the pooled rate of good data management practices with a fixed-effects model at a 95% confidence interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the first phase, 943 publications on data management practices of healthcare professionals were identified from multiple databases between October 10 and November 10, 2024. A total of 221 studies were excluded due to duplication, and an additional 705 studies were removed for being irrelevant to the outcome of interest. An additional 10 articles were excluded due to missing outcome data or unavailable full texts. Ultimately, 7 studies involving a total of 2654 health professionals were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled estimate of good data management practice in Ethiopia was 64.4% (95% CI, 52.27-76.47%). The subgroup analysis revealed the highest proportion in Gondar at 73.02% (95% CI, 52.33-93.70%), and the lowest proportion was observed in the Oromia Special Zone, at 53.62% (95% CI, 29.21-78.02%). Similarly, studies conducted before 2019 reported a slightly lower prevalence (63.60%; 95% CI, 44.76-82.45%) compared to those conducted after 2019 (64.91%; 95% CI, 49.13-80.69%). However, the subgroup analysis indicated that these differences were not statistically significant across study years or regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pooled meta-analysis result revealed that approximately six out of ten healthcare professionals in Ethiopia engage in good data management practices, highlighting a significant improvement in this critical area. Although there were a geographical variations and study year, it was not statistically significant. These results underscore the need for targeted interventions to enhance data management practices. By investing in training, improving infrastructure, and fostering a culture that values data utilization, stakeholders can significantly elevate the standard of data management among healthcare professionals. Addressing these gaps is essential for strengthening health information systems and ultimately improving health outcomes across Ethiopia.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"135"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12224703/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health professional's data management practice in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mequannent Sharew Melaku, Bedilu Geremew, Tesema Zewdu, Zemenu Molla, Rukya Yassin, Agmasie Damtew Walle, Lamrot Yohannes\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13643-025-02851-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A global focus is producing high-quality data for use in decision-making at all levels of the health system. Healthcare professionals' data handling techniques have been the subject of numerous research, yet the findings have been wildly inconsistent in Ethiopia. This inconsistency has not been thoroughly examined, leaving a gap in reliable evidence regarding the overall magnitude of effective data management practices within the healthcare system of Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review aimed to determine the pooled magnitude of data management practices amid healthcare professionals in Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a search strategy and conducted a comprehensive search across PubMed, Web of Science, African journals of online, Ethiopian journal of health science, Scopus, Medline, Embase, WHO Global Health Library, Google Scholar, Scopus, HINARI, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant studies between October 10 and November 10, 2024. The Joanna Briggs Institute quality assessment methodology, which has nine categories, was used to evaluate each study's quality. Microsoft Excel version 2019 and Stata software was used to extract and analyzes the data. We calculated total heterogeneity across studies using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic and estimated the pooled rate of good data management practices with a fixed-effects model at a 95% confidence interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the first phase, 943 publications on data management practices of healthcare professionals were identified from multiple databases between October 10 and November 10, 2024. A total of 221 studies were excluded due to duplication, and an additional 705 studies were removed for being irrelevant to the outcome of interest. An additional 10 articles were excluded due to missing outcome data or unavailable full texts. Ultimately, 7 studies involving a total of 2654 health professionals were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled estimate of good data management practice in Ethiopia was 64.4% (95% CI, 52.27-76.47%). The subgroup analysis revealed the highest proportion in Gondar at 73.02% (95% CI, 52.33-93.70%), and the lowest proportion was observed in the Oromia Special Zone, at 53.62% (95% CI, 29.21-78.02%). Similarly, studies conducted before 2019 reported a slightly lower prevalence (63.60%; 95% CI, 44.76-82.45%) compared to those conducted after 2019 (64.91%; 95% CI, 49.13-80.69%). However, the subgroup analysis indicated that these differences were not statistically significant across study years or regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pooled meta-analysis result revealed that approximately six out of ten healthcare professionals in Ethiopia engage in good data management practices, highlighting a significant improvement in this critical area. Although there were a geographical variations and study year, it was not statistically significant. These results underscore the need for targeted interventions to enhance data management practices. By investing in training, improving infrastructure, and fostering a culture that values data utilization, stakeholders can significantly elevate the standard of data management among healthcare professionals. Addressing these gaps is essential for strengthening health information systems and ultimately improving health outcomes across Ethiopia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"135\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12224703/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02851-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02851-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:全球关注的焦点是为卫生系统各级决策提供高质量数据。医疗保健专业人员的数据处理技术一直是众多研究的主题,但在埃塞俄比亚,研究结果却极不一致。这种不一致尚未得到彻底检查,在埃塞俄比亚卫生保健系统内有效数据管理实践的总体规模方面留下了可靠证据的空白。目的:本综述旨在确定埃塞俄比亚医疗保健专业人员数据管理实践的总体规模。方法:我们制定了一项搜索策略,并在PubMed、Web of Science、African journals of online、Ethiopian journal of health Science、Scopus、Medline、Embase、WHO Global health Library、谷歌Scholar、Scopus、HINARI、CINAHL和Cochrane Library进行了全面的搜索,以确定2024年10月10日至11月10日之间的相关研究。乔安娜布里格斯研究所的质量评估方法分为九个类别,用于评估每项研究的质量。采用Microsoft Excel version 2019和Stata软件对数据进行提取和分析。我们使用I2统计量计算了各研究的总异质性,并在95%置信区间内使用固定效应模型估计了良好数据管理实践的合并率。结果:第一阶段,在2024年10月10日至11月10日期间,从多个数据库中识别出943篇关于医疗保健专业人员数据管理实践的出版物。共有221项研究因重复而被排除,另有705项研究因与研究结果无关而被排除。另有10篇文章因缺少结局数据或无法获得全文而被排除。最终,涉及2654名卫生专业人员的7项研究被纳入meta分析。埃塞俄比亚良好数据管理实践的总体汇总估计为64.4% (95% CI, 52.27-76.47%)。亚组分析显示,冈达尔地区发病率最高,为73.02% (95% CI, 52.33-93.70%),奥罗米亚特区发病率最低,为53.62% (95% CI, 29.21-78.02%)。同样,2019年之前进行的研究报告的患病率略低(63.60%;95% CI, 44.76-82.45%),而2019年之后进行的调查(64.91%;95% ci, 49.13-80.69%)。然而,亚组分析表明,这些差异在研究年份或地区之间没有统计学意义。结论:综合荟萃分析结果显示,埃塞俄比亚约有十分之六的医疗保健专业人员参与了良好的数据管理实践,突出了这一关键领域的重大改进。虽然存在地理差异和研究年份,但在统计学上不显著。这些结果强调需要有针对性的干预措施来加强数据管理实践。通过投资培训、改善基础设施和培养重视数据利用的文化,利益相关者可以显著提高医疗保健专业人员的数据管理水平。解决这些差距对于加强卫生信息系统和最终改善埃塞俄比亚各地的卫生结果至关重要。
Health professional's data management practice in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: A global focus is producing high-quality data for use in decision-making at all levels of the health system. Healthcare professionals' data handling techniques have been the subject of numerous research, yet the findings have been wildly inconsistent in Ethiopia. This inconsistency has not been thoroughly examined, leaving a gap in reliable evidence regarding the overall magnitude of effective data management practices within the healthcare system of Ethiopia.
Objective: This review aimed to determine the pooled magnitude of data management practices amid healthcare professionals in Ethiopia.
Methods: We developed a search strategy and conducted a comprehensive search across PubMed, Web of Science, African journals of online, Ethiopian journal of health science, Scopus, Medline, Embase, WHO Global Health Library, Google Scholar, Scopus, HINARI, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant studies between October 10 and November 10, 2024. The Joanna Briggs Institute quality assessment methodology, which has nine categories, was used to evaluate each study's quality. Microsoft Excel version 2019 and Stata software was used to extract and analyzes the data. We calculated total heterogeneity across studies using the I2 statistic and estimated the pooled rate of good data management practices with a fixed-effects model at a 95% confidence interval.
Results: In the first phase, 943 publications on data management practices of healthcare professionals were identified from multiple databases between October 10 and November 10, 2024. A total of 221 studies were excluded due to duplication, and an additional 705 studies were removed for being irrelevant to the outcome of interest. An additional 10 articles were excluded due to missing outcome data or unavailable full texts. Ultimately, 7 studies involving a total of 2654 health professionals were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled estimate of good data management practice in Ethiopia was 64.4% (95% CI, 52.27-76.47%). The subgroup analysis revealed the highest proportion in Gondar at 73.02% (95% CI, 52.33-93.70%), and the lowest proportion was observed in the Oromia Special Zone, at 53.62% (95% CI, 29.21-78.02%). Similarly, studies conducted before 2019 reported a slightly lower prevalence (63.60%; 95% CI, 44.76-82.45%) compared to those conducted after 2019 (64.91%; 95% CI, 49.13-80.69%). However, the subgroup analysis indicated that these differences were not statistically significant across study years or regions.
Conclusion: The pooled meta-analysis result revealed that approximately six out of ten healthcare professionals in Ethiopia engage in good data management practices, highlighting a significant improvement in this critical area. Although there were a geographical variations and study year, it was not statistically significant. These results underscore the need for targeted interventions to enhance data management practices. By investing in training, improving infrastructure, and fostering a culture that values data utilization, stakeholders can significantly elevate the standard of data management among healthcare professionals. Addressing these gaps is essential for strengthening health information systems and ultimately improving health outcomes across Ethiopia.
期刊介绍:
Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.