基于机器学习的生化检测参数预测乳糜泻抗体血清阳性。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Signe Ulfbeck Schovsbo, Michael Charles Sachs, Margit Kriegbaum, Anne Ahrendt Bjerregaard, Line Tang Møllehave, Susanne Hansen, Bent Struer Lind, Tora Grauers Willadsen, Allan Linneberg, Christen Lykkegaard Andersen, Line Lund Kårhus
{"title":"基于机器学习的生化检测参数预测乳糜泻抗体血清阳性。","authors":"Signe Ulfbeck Schovsbo, Michael Charles Sachs, Margit Kriegbaum, Anne Ahrendt Bjerregaard, Line Tang Møllehave, Susanne Hansen, Bent Struer Lind, Tora Grauers Willadsen, Allan Linneberg, Christen Lykkegaard Andersen, Line Lund Kårhus","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-08225-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The diagnostic delay in celiac disease (CD) is currently a burden for individual and society. Biochemical tests may be used in risk-identification of CD to reduce the diagnostic delay, and we aimed to explore prediction models for CD antibody seropositivity. We developed two prediction models in a cohort study using data from primary care in greater Copenhagen (2006-2015). All patients with CD antibody tests were included. Two candidate sets of predictors were considered: (1) all blood tests measured, (2) tests deemed clinically relevant pre-study or previously studied. Both models assessed test results 5 years before CD-testing. We developed and evaluated prediction models in 10-fold cross-validation framework for each set of predictors. Four machine learning methods were combined in stacked models using SuperLearner. 54,877 patients were included, 672 CD antibody seropositive. Cross-validated estimated area under the curves were 0.68 and 0.63. Distributions of predicted probabilities overlapped substantially between patients with CD antibody seropositivity and seronegativity. Food allergen antibody and IgA were the most important predictors. Biochemical tests had low predictive power but provided methodological insights for future models. These may improve by combining biochemical tests with other clinical information but should preferably aim to stay clinically implementable.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"23732"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12229532/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning-based prediction of celiac antibody seropositivity by biochemical test parameters.\",\"authors\":\"Signe Ulfbeck Schovsbo, Michael Charles Sachs, Margit Kriegbaum, Anne Ahrendt Bjerregaard, Line Tang Møllehave, Susanne Hansen, Bent Struer Lind, Tora Grauers Willadsen, Allan Linneberg, Christen Lykkegaard Andersen, Line Lund Kårhus\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-08225-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The diagnostic delay in celiac disease (CD) is currently a burden for individual and society. Biochemical tests may be used in risk-identification of CD to reduce the diagnostic delay, and we aimed to explore prediction models for CD antibody seropositivity. We developed two prediction models in a cohort study using data from primary care in greater Copenhagen (2006-2015). All patients with CD antibody tests were included. Two candidate sets of predictors were considered: (1) all blood tests measured, (2) tests deemed clinically relevant pre-study or previously studied. Both models assessed test results 5 years before CD-testing. We developed and evaluated prediction models in 10-fold cross-validation framework for each set of predictors. Four machine learning methods were combined in stacked models using SuperLearner. 54,877 patients were included, 672 CD antibody seropositive. Cross-validated estimated area under the curves were 0.68 and 0.63. Distributions of predicted probabilities overlapped substantially between patients with CD antibody seropositivity and seronegativity. Food allergen antibody and IgA were the most important predictors. Biochemical tests had low predictive power but provided methodological insights for future models. These may improve by combining biochemical tests with other clinical information but should preferably aim to stay clinically implementable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"23732\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12229532/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-08225-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-08225-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

乳糜泻(CD)的诊断延迟是目前个人和社会的负担。生化试验可用于CD的风险识别,以减少诊断延误,我们旨在探索CD抗体血清阳性的预测模型。我们在一项队列研究中开发了两个预测模型,该研究使用了大哥本哈根地区(2006-2015年)的初级保健数据。所有进行乳糜泻抗体检测的患者均纳入研究。考虑了两组候选预测因子:(1)所有测量的血液测试,(2)被认为与临床相关的预先研究或先前研究的测试。两种模型在cd测试前5年评估测试结果。我们为每组预测因子在10倍交叉验证框架中开发和评估预测模型。使用SuperLearner将四种机器学习方法组合在堆叠模型中。共纳入54877例患者,血清CD抗体阳性672例。交叉验证的曲线下估计面积分别为0.68和0.63。CD抗体血清阳性和血清阴性患者的预测概率分布有很大的重叠。食物过敏原抗体和IgA是最重要的预测因子。生化测试的预测能力较低,但为未来的模型提供了方法学上的见解。这些可以通过将生化测试与其他临床信息相结合来改善,但最好以保持临床可实施为目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Machine learning-based prediction of celiac antibody seropositivity by biochemical test parameters.

Machine learning-based prediction of celiac antibody seropositivity by biochemical test parameters.

Machine learning-based prediction of celiac antibody seropositivity by biochemical test parameters.

Machine learning-based prediction of celiac antibody seropositivity by biochemical test parameters.

The diagnostic delay in celiac disease (CD) is currently a burden for individual and society. Biochemical tests may be used in risk-identification of CD to reduce the diagnostic delay, and we aimed to explore prediction models for CD antibody seropositivity. We developed two prediction models in a cohort study using data from primary care in greater Copenhagen (2006-2015). All patients with CD antibody tests were included. Two candidate sets of predictors were considered: (1) all blood tests measured, (2) tests deemed clinically relevant pre-study or previously studied. Both models assessed test results 5 years before CD-testing. We developed and evaluated prediction models in 10-fold cross-validation framework for each set of predictors. Four machine learning methods were combined in stacked models using SuperLearner. 54,877 patients were included, 672 CD antibody seropositive. Cross-validated estimated area under the curves were 0.68 and 0.63. Distributions of predicted probabilities overlapped substantially between patients with CD antibody seropositivity and seronegativity. Food allergen antibody and IgA were the most important predictors. Biochemical tests had low predictive power but provided methodological insights for future models. These may improve by combining biochemical tests with other clinical information but should preferably aim to stay clinically implementable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信