{"title":"温带河流主要手拟动物类群区域物种丰富度差异的驱动因素及元群落视角","authors":"Łukasz Głowacki, Joanna Leszczyńska, Małgorzata Dukowska","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-05559-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deterministic and stochastic drivers in metacommunities of main chironomid taxa were identified by an analysis of the taxa's local species richness (LSR), environmental and seasonal factors, and habitat species richness (HSR), in samples collected at the mid-European regional scale. Orthocladiinae LSR depended on Orthocladiinae HSR, while Chironomini LSR did not depend on Chironomini HSR. Environmental drivers and autumn (optionally with HSR) explained over 70% of Orthocladiinae LSR variance, while environmental factors (optionally with HSR) explained less than 40% of Chironomini LSR variance. In both taxa, stochastic processes dominated over deterministic ones because species random co-occurrence was more frequent than non-random co-occurrence. In each taxon, about 20% of species pairs were non-random. Yet, in the Orthocladiinae, no pairs, while in the Chironomini one third of pairs, were negatively associated. Only the Chironomini metacommunity was competitively structured. In the Orthocladiinae, deterministic drivers were more abiotic (higher number and greater impact of environmental factors, a seasonal factor, no negative species co-occurrences), while in the Chironomini, deterministic drivers were more biotic (negative species co-occurrences, competitive metacommunity structure, no seasonal factor, lower number and smaller impact of abiotic factors).</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"23733"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12229633/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drivers and metacommunity perspective of differences in regional species richness between main chironomid taxa inhabiting temperate zone rivers.\",\"authors\":\"Łukasz Głowacki, Joanna Leszczyńska, Małgorzata Dukowska\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-05559-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Deterministic and stochastic drivers in metacommunities of main chironomid taxa were identified by an analysis of the taxa's local species richness (LSR), environmental and seasonal factors, and habitat species richness (HSR), in samples collected at the mid-European regional scale. Orthocladiinae LSR depended on Orthocladiinae HSR, while Chironomini LSR did not depend on Chironomini HSR. Environmental drivers and autumn (optionally with HSR) explained over 70% of Orthocladiinae LSR variance, while environmental factors (optionally with HSR) explained less than 40% of Chironomini LSR variance. In both taxa, stochastic processes dominated over deterministic ones because species random co-occurrence was more frequent than non-random co-occurrence. In each taxon, about 20% of species pairs were non-random. Yet, in the Orthocladiinae, no pairs, while in the Chironomini one third of pairs, were negatively associated. Only the Chironomini metacommunity was competitively structured. In the Orthocladiinae, deterministic drivers were more abiotic (higher number and greater impact of environmental factors, a seasonal factor, no negative species co-occurrences), while in the Chironomini, deterministic drivers were more biotic (negative species co-occurrences, competitive metacommunity structure, no seasonal factor, lower number and smaller impact of abiotic factors).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"23733\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12229633/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-05559-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-05559-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Drivers and metacommunity perspective of differences in regional species richness between main chironomid taxa inhabiting temperate zone rivers.
Deterministic and stochastic drivers in metacommunities of main chironomid taxa were identified by an analysis of the taxa's local species richness (LSR), environmental and seasonal factors, and habitat species richness (HSR), in samples collected at the mid-European regional scale. Orthocladiinae LSR depended on Orthocladiinae HSR, while Chironomini LSR did not depend on Chironomini HSR. Environmental drivers and autumn (optionally with HSR) explained over 70% of Orthocladiinae LSR variance, while environmental factors (optionally with HSR) explained less than 40% of Chironomini LSR variance. In both taxa, stochastic processes dominated over deterministic ones because species random co-occurrence was more frequent than non-random co-occurrence. In each taxon, about 20% of species pairs were non-random. Yet, in the Orthocladiinae, no pairs, while in the Chironomini one third of pairs, were negatively associated. Only the Chironomini metacommunity was competitively structured. In the Orthocladiinae, deterministic drivers were more abiotic (higher number and greater impact of environmental factors, a seasonal factor, no negative species co-occurrences), while in the Chironomini, deterministic drivers were more biotic (negative species co-occurrences, competitive metacommunity structure, no seasonal factor, lower number and smaller impact of abiotic factors).
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.