Sébastien Poix, Patrick O'Donnell, Khalifa Elmusharaf
{"title":"低收入和中等收入国家对孕前健康不作为造成的围产期死亡的经济负担:人口归因比例和经济影响分析。","authors":"Sébastien Poix, Patrick O'Donnell, Khalifa Elmusharaf","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0325086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Poor preconception health has been associated with several pregnancy and childbirth-related complications, including perinatal mortality. Yet, the health and economic burden that inaction on preconception health places on societies remains under-researched, hindering efforts to address these issues effectively. This study aimed to quantify the economic burden of perinatal mortality attributable to five preconception risk factors in fifteen low and middle-income countries (LMICs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a population-attributable fraction analysis to estimate the proportion of perinatal deaths in 2020 attributable to adolescent pregnancy, short birth intervals, intimate partner violence before pregnancy, pre-pregnancy overweight and obesity, and female genital mutilation. We then performed an economic impact analysis to quantify the foregone productivity and the societal costs due to these perinatal deaths, using both the human capital and the value of a statistical life-year approach.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>More than 230,000 (20.7%) perinatal deaths were attributable to the five selected risk factors in the fifteen LMICs in 2020. The productivity losses were estimated at $INT21.3 billion, representing 0.7% of the combined GDP of those countries in 2020. The societal costs of perinatal mortality, the total economic burden was $INT51.0 billion.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our findings indicate that inaction on preconception care potentially contributes to a substantial proportion of the burden of perinatal mortality, which, in turn, generates profound and long-term economic and societal losses in LMICs. These results highlight the need for effective preconception strategies and relevant policies, and further research is needed to explore the economic value of preconception care in these settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 7","pages":"e0325086"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12225852/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The economic burden of perinatal mortality due to inaction on preconception health in low and middle-income countries: A population attributable fraction and economic impact analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Sébastien Poix, Patrick O'Donnell, Khalifa Elmusharaf\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0325086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Poor preconception health has been associated with several pregnancy and childbirth-related complications, including perinatal mortality. Yet, the health and economic burden that inaction on preconception health places on societies remains under-researched, hindering efforts to address these issues effectively. This study aimed to quantify the economic burden of perinatal mortality attributable to five preconception risk factors in fifteen low and middle-income countries (LMICs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a population-attributable fraction analysis to estimate the proportion of perinatal deaths in 2020 attributable to adolescent pregnancy, short birth intervals, intimate partner violence before pregnancy, pre-pregnancy overweight and obesity, and female genital mutilation. We then performed an economic impact analysis to quantify the foregone productivity and the societal costs due to these perinatal deaths, using both the human capital and the value of a statistical life-year approach.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>More than 230,000 (20.7%) perinatal deaths were attributable to the five selected risk factors in the fifteen LMICs in 2020. The productivity losses were estimated at $INT21.3 billion, representing 0.7% of the combined GDP of those countries in 2020. The societal costs of perinatal mortality, the total economic burden was $INT51.0 billion.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our findings indicate that inaction on preconception care potentially contributes to a substantial proportion of the burden of perinatal mortality, which, in turn, generates profound and long-term economic and societal losses in LMICs. These results highlight the need for effective preconception strategies and relevant policies, and further research is needed to explore the economic value of preconception care in these settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 7\",\"pages\":\"e0325086\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12225852/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325086\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325086","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The economic burden of perinatal mortality due to inaction on preconception health in low and middle-income countries: A population attributable fraction and economic impact analysis.
Background: Poor preconception health has been associated with several pregnancy and childbirth-related complications, including perinatal mortality. Yet, the health and economic burden that inaction on preconception health places on societies remains under-researched, hindering efforts to address these issues effectively. This study aimed to quantify the economic burden of perinatal mortality attributable to five preconception risk factors in fifteen low and middle-income countries (LMICs).
Methods: We used a population-attributable fraction analysis to estimate the proportion of perinatal deaths in 2020 attributable to adolescent pregnancy, short birth intervals, intimate partner violence before pregnancy, pre-pregnancy overweight and obesity, and female genital mutilation. We then performed an economic impact analysis to quantify the foregone productivity and the societal costs due to these perinatal deaths, using both the human capital and the value of a statistical life-year approach.
Findings: More than 230,000 (20.7%) perinatal deaths were attributable to the five selected risk factors in the fifteen LMICs in 2020. The productivity losses were estimated at $INT21.3 billion, representing 0.7% of the combined GDP of those countries in 2020. The societal costs of perinatal mortality, the total economic burden was $INT51.0 billion.
Interpretation: Our findings indicate that inaction on preconception care potentially contributes to a substantial proportion of the burden of perinatal mortality, which, in turn, generates profound and long-term economic and societal losses in LMICs. These results highlight the need for effective preconception strategies and relevant policies, and further research is needed to explore the economic value of preconception care in these settings.
期刊介绍:
PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides:
* Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright
* Fast publication times
* Peer review by expert, practicing researchers
* Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact
* Community-based dialogue on articles
* Worldwide media coverage