肾超声诊断尿路扩张的神经网络分类比较:与专家分类的一致性评价。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric Radiology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-04 DOI:10.1007/s00247-025-06311-5
Kee Chung, Shaoju Wu, Chow Jeanne, Andy Tsai
{"title":"肾超声诊断尿路扩张的神经网络分类比较:与专家分类的一致性评价。","authors":"Kee Chung, Shaoju Wu, Chow Jeanne, Andy Tsai","doi":"10.1007/s00247-025-06311-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Urinary tract dilation (UTD) is a frequent problem in infants. Automated and objective classification of UTD from renal ultrasounds would streamline their interpretations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and evaluate the performance of different deep learning models in predicting UTD classifications from renal ultrasound images.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We searched our image archive to identify renal ultrasounds performed in infants ≤ 3-months-old for the clinical indications of prenatal UTD and urinary tract infection (9/2023-8/2024). An expert pediatric uroradiologist provided the ground truth UTD labels for representative sagittal sonographic renal images. Three different deep learning models trained with cross-entropy loss were adapted with four-fold cross-validation experiments to determine the overall performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our curated database included 492 right and 487 left renal ultrasounds (mean age ± standard deviation = 1.2 ± 0.1 months for both cohorts, with 341 boys/151 girls and 339 boys/148 girls, respectively). The model prediction accuracies for the right and left kidneys were 88.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], [85.8%, 91.5%]) and 80.5% (95% CI, [77.6%, 82.9%]), with weighted kappa scores of 0.90 (95% CI, [0.88, 0.91]) and 0.87 (95% CI, [0.82, 0.92]), respectively. When predictions were binarized into mild (normal/P1) and severe (UTD P2/P3) dilation, accuracies of the right and left kidneys increased to 96.3% (95% CI, [94.9%, 97.8%]) and 91.3% (95% CI, [88.5%, 94.2%]), but agreements decreased to 0.78 (95% CI, [0.73, 0.82]) and 0.75 (95% CI, [0.68, 0.82]), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deep learning models demonstrated high accuracy and agreement in classifying UTD from infant renal ultrasounds, supporting their potential as decision-support tools in clinical workflows.</p>","PeriodicalId":19755,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"1846-1856"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of neural networks for classification of urinary tract dilation from renal ultrasounds: evaluation of agreement with expert categorization.\",\"authors\":\"Kee Chung, Shaoju Wu, Chow Jeanne, Andy Tsai\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00247-025-06311-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Urinary tract dilation (UTD) is a frequent problem in infants. Automated and objective classification of UTD from renal ultrasounds would streamline their interpretations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and evaluate the performance of different deep learning models in predicting UTD classifications from renal ultrasound images.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We searched our image archive to identify renal ultrasounds performed in infants ≤ 3-months-old for the clinical indications of prenatal UTD and urinary tract infection (9/2023-8/2024). An expert pediatric uroradiologist provided the ground truth UTD labels for representative sagittal sonographic renal images. Three different deep learning models trained with cross-entropy loss were adapted with four-fold cross-validation experiments to determine the overall performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our curated database included 492 right and 487 left renal ultrasounds (mean age ± standard deviation = 1.2 ± 0.1 months for both cohorts, with 341 boys/151 girls and 339 boys/148 girls, respectively). The model prediction accuracies for the right and left kidneys were 88.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], [85.8%, 91.5%]) and 80.5% (95% CI, [77.6%, 82.9%]), with weighted kappa scores of 0.90 (95% CI, [0.88, 0.91]) and 0.87 (95% CI, [0.82, 0.92]), respectively. When predictions were binarized into mild (normal/P1) and severe (UTD P2/P3) dilation, accuracies of the right and left kidneys increased to 96.3% (95% CI, [94.9%, 97.8%]) and 91.3% (95% CI, [88.5%, 94.2%]), but agreements decreased to 0.78 (95% CI, [0.73, 0.82]) and 0.75 (95% CI, [0.68, 0.82]), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deep learning models demonstrated high accuracy and agreement in classifying UTD from infant renal ultrasounds, supporting their potential as decision-support tools in clinical workflows.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1846-1856\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-025-06311-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-025-06311-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尿路扩张(UTD)是婴幼儿的常见病。从肾脏超声自动客观分类UTD将简化其解释。目的:建立并评价不同深度学习模型在肾脏超声图像预测UTD分类中的性能。材料和方法:我们检索影像档案,找出≤3个月婴儿的肾脏超声检查的临床指征为产前UTD和尿路感染(9/2023-8/2024)。一位儿科放射专家为具有代表性的矢状位超声肾脏图像提供了真实的UTD标签。采用交叉熵损失训练的三种不同的深度学习模型进行了四倍交叉验证实验,以确定整体性能。结果:我们整理的数据库包括492个右肾和487个左肾超声(两个队列的平均年龄±标准差= 1.2±0.1个月,分别为341个男孩/151个女孩和339个男孩/148个女孩)。模型对右肾和左肾的预测准确率分别为88.7%(95%可信区间[CI],[85.8%, 91.5%])和80.5% (95% CI,[77.6%, 82.9%]),加权kappa评分分别为0.90 (95% CI,[0.88, 0.91])和0.87 (95% CI,[0.82, 0.92])。当预测被二值化为轻度(正常/P1)和重度(UTD P2/P3)扩张时,右肾和左肾的准确性分别增加到96.3% (95% CI,[94.9%, 97.8%])和91.3% (95% CI,[88.5%, 94.2%]),但一致性分别下降到0.78 (95% CI,[0.73, 0.82])和0.75 (95% CI,[0.68, 0.82])。结论:深度学习模型在从婴儿肾脏超声中分类UTD方面显示出较高的准确性和一致性,支持其作为临床工作流程决策支持工具的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of neural networks for classification of urinary tract dilation from renal ultrasounds: evaluation of agreement with expert categorization.

Background: Urinary tract dilation (UTD) is a frequent problem in infants. Automated and objective classification of UTD from renal ultrasounds would streamline their interpretations.

Objective: To develop and evaluate the performance of different deep learning models in predicting UTD classifications from renal ultrasound images.

Materials and methods: We searched our image archive to identify renal ultrasounds performed in infants ≤ 3-months-old for the clinical indications of prenatal UTD and urinary tract infection (9/2023-8/2024). An expert pediatric uroradiologist provided the ground truth UTD labels for representative sagittal sonographic renal images. Three different deep learning models trained with cross-entropy loss were adapted with four-fold cross-validation experiments to determine the overall performance.

Results: Our curated database included 492 right and 487 left renal ultrasounds (mean age ± standard deviation = 1.2 ± 0.1 months for both cohorts, with 341 boys/151 girls and 339 boys/148 girls, respectively). The model prediction accuracies for the right and left kidneys were 88.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], [85.8%, 91.5%]) and 80.5% (95% CI, [77.6%, 82.9%]), with weighted kappa scores of 0.90 (95% CI, [0.88, 0.91]) and 0.87 (95% CI, [0.82, 0.92]), respectively. When predictions were binarized into mild (normal/P1) and severe (UTD P2/P3) dilation, accuracies of the right and left kidneys increased to 96.3% (95% CI, [94.9%, 97.8%]) and 91.3% (95% CI, [88.5%, 94.2%]), but agreements decreased to 0.78 (95% CI, [0.73, 0.82]) and 0.75 (95% CI, [0.68, 0.82]), respectively.

Conclusion: Deep learning models demonstrated high accuracy and agreement in classifying UTD from infant renal ultrasounds, supporting their potential as decision-support tools in clinical workflows.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Radiology
Pediatric Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.40%
发文量
300
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Society of Pediatric Radiology, the Society for Pediatric Radiology and the Asian and Oceanic Society for Pediatric Radiology Pediatric Radiology informs its readers of new findings and progress in all areas of pediatric imaging and in related fields. This is achieved by a blend of original papers, complemented by reviews that set out the present state of knowledge in a particular area of the specialty or summarize specific topics in which discussion has led to clear conclusions. Advances in technology, methodology, apparatus and auxiliary equipment are presented, and modifications of standard techniques are described. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信