耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌聚合酶链反应鼻拭子在烧伤患者中的临床应用。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Jade Montgomery, Rachel Burgoon, Aaron Hamby, Melanie Smith Condeni
{"title":"耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌聚合酶链反应鼻拭子在烧伤患者中的临床应用。","authors":"Jade Montgomery, Rachel Burgoon, Aaron Hamby, Melanie Smith Condeni","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a common pathogen in burn injured patients. Many studies have evaluated the overall utility of MRSA nares polymerase chain reaction (PCR) swabs for antimicrobial stewardship; however, there is a paucity of data in burns. This study evaluated the clinical utility of MRSA PCR in burn injured patients at an academic medical center. This retrospective, single-center chart review included admitted adult burn injured patients from July 2020 to June 2024. The primary objective was to determine the overall negative predictive value (NPV) of MRSA PCR in burn injury patients for suspected MRSA infections. Secondary objectives included determining the sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and positive predictive value (PPV) of MRSA PCR for specific culture types. There were 89 patients, and 289 cultures included. The overall prevalence of MRSA positive cultures was 13.4% for the study period. For the primary outcome, the NPV of MRSA PCR was 98.3% [95% Confidence interval 95.5-99.5%]. For the whole cohort the PPV was 22.5%, sensitivity was 73.4% and specificity was 86.1%. The total cost of vancomycin therapy (doses and levels) was US $37,935.75, which was estimated using average wholesale price. A cost avoidance of US $378.15 per patient was estimated for patients not meeting criteria for vancomycin therapy. Overall, this study found a high NPV for MRSA PCR for infections in burn injured patients. Additionally, MRSA PCR may be utilized along with other clinical markers to decrease use of antimicrobials targeting MRSA which may help decrease cost of therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical utility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus polymerase chain reaction nares swabs in burn injured patients.\",\"authors\":\"Jade Montgomery, Rachel Burgoon, Aaron Hamby, Melanie Smith Condeni\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbcr/iraf120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a common pathogen in burn injured patients. Many studies have evaluated the overall utility of MRSA nares polymerase chain reaction (PCR) swabs for antimicrobial stewardship; however, there is a paucity of data in burns. This study evaluated the clinical utility of MRSA PCR in burn injured patients at an academic medical center. This retrospective, single-center chart review included admitted adult burn injured patients from July 2020 to June 2024. The primary objective was to determine the overall negative predictive value (NPV) of MRSA PCR in burn injury patients for suspected MRSA infections. Secondary objectives included determining the sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and positive predictive value (PPV) of MRSA PCR for specific culture types. There were 89 patients, and 289 cultures included. The overall prevalence of MRSA positive cultures was 13.4% for the study period. For the primary outcome, the NPV of MRSA PCR was 98.3% [95% Confidence interval 95.5-99.5%]. For the whole cohort the PPV was 22.5%, sensitivity was 73.4% and specificity was 86.1%. The total cost of vancomycin therapy (doses and levels) was US $37,935.75, which was estimated using average wholesale price. A cost avoidance of US $378.15 per patient was estimated for patients not meeting criteria for vancomycin therapy. Overall, this study found a high NPV for MRSA PCR for infections in burn injured patients. Additionally, MRSA PCR may be utilized along with other clinical markers to decrease use of antimicrobials targeting MRSA which may help decrease cost of therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf120\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf120","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)是烧伤患者常见的病原菌。许多研究已经评估了MRSA纳米聚合酶链反应(PCR)拭子在抗菌药物管理中的总体效用;然而,关于烧伤的数据缺乏。本研究评估了MRSA PCR在某学术医疗中心烧伤患者中的临床应用。这项回顾性的单中心图表回顾纳入了2020年7月至2024年6月住院的成人烧伤患者。主要目的是确定MRSA PCR对烧伤患者疑似MRSA感染的总体阴性预测值(NPV)。次要目的包括确定MRSA PCR对特定培养类型的敏感性、特异性、NPV和阳性预测值(PPV)。89例患者,289例培养。在研究期间,MRSA阳性培养的总体流行率为13.4%。对于主要结局,MRSA PCR的NPV为98.3%[95%可信区间95.5-99.5%]。整个队列的PPV为22.5%,敏感性为73.4%,特异性为86.1%。万古霉素治疗的总费用(剂量和水平)为37,935.75美元,这是使用平均批发价格估计的。对于不符合万古霉素治疗标准的患者,估计每位患者可避免378.15美元的费用。总体而言,本研究发现MRSA PCR对烧伤患者感染的NPV较高。此外,MRSA PCR可以与其他临床标记一起使用,以减少针对MRSA的抗菌剂的使用,这可能有助于降低治疗成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical utility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus polymerase chain reaction nares swabs in burn injured patients.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a common pathogen in burn injured patients. Many studies have evaluated the overall utility of MRSA nares polymerase chain reaction (PCR) swabs for antimicrobial stewardship; however, there is a paucity of data in burns. This study evaluated the clinical utility of MRSA PCR in burn injured patients at an academic medical center. This retrospective, single-center chart review included admitted adult burn injured patients from July 2020 to June 2024. The primary objective was to determine the overall negative predictive value (NPV) of MRSA PCR in burn injury patients for suspected MRSA infections. Secondary objectives included determining the sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and positive predictive value (PPV) of MRSA PCR for specific culture types. There were 89 patients, and 289 cultures included. The overall prevalence of MRSA positive cultures was 13.4% for the study period. For the primary outcome, the NPV of MRSA PCR was 98.3% [95% Confidence interval 95.5-99.5%]. For the whole cohort the PPV was 22.5%, sensitivity was 73.4% and specificity was 86.1%. The total cost of vancomycin therapy (doses and levels) was US $37,935.75, which was estimated using average wholesale price. A cost avoidance of US $378.15 per patient was estimated for patients not meeting criteria for vancomycin therapy. Overall, this study found a high NPV for MRSA PCR for infections in burn injured patients. Additionally, MRSA PCR may be utilized along with other clinical markers to decrease use of antimicrobials targeting MRSA which may help decrease cost of therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信