TACE联合免疫检查点抑制剂加分子靶向治疗老年人不可切除肝癌的安全性和有效性

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Xin Hong, Jin-Tao Huang, Di Hu, Wen-Jie Zhou, Jian Shen, Xiao-Li Zhu
{"title":"TACE联合免疫检查点抑制剂加分子靶向治疗老年人不可切除肝癌的安全性和有效性","authors":"Xin Hong, Jin-Tao Huang, Di Hu, Wen-Jie Zhou, Jian Shen, Xiao-Li Zhu","doi":"10.1007/s00432-025-06257-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the efficacy and tolerability of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus molecular targeted therapies (MTT) in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (≥ 65 years).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, multicenter study enrolled treatment-naïve HCC patients undergoing TACE combined with ICIs and MTT at three Chinese medical centers from June 2019 to December 2023. The study's primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), with secondary endpoints being the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) per modified RECIST criteria, and adverse events (AEs). To minimize selection bias, propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized for the elderly and younger patient cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort comprised 317 patients, with a median OS of 30.8 months for the overall population. The elderly patients had comparable OS (median, 33.3 vs. 30.4 months, P = 0.219) than younger patients. The PSM cohort included 106 elderly patients and 106 younger patients. After PSM, the elderly patients also had similar OS compared with younger patients (median, 33.3 vs. 24.6 months, P = 0.141). Meanwhile, the elderly patients achieved a similar ORR and DCR (58.5% vs. 54.7%, P = 0.579; 90.1% vs. 85.8%, P = 0.287, respectively) versus younger patients. No obvious differences in grade 3/4 AEs were noted among the two groups, and no new safety concerns arose.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elderly patients (age ≥ 65 years) receiving TACE combined with ICIs and MTT showed similar trends in prognosis and safety profiles compared with younger patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","volume":"151 7","pages":"202"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12226637/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and efficacy of TACE combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors plus molecular targeted therapies in older adults with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Xin Hong, Jin-Tao Huang, Di Hu, Wen-Jie Zhou, Jian Shen, Xiao-Li Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00432-025-06257-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the efficacy and tolerability of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus molecular targeted therapies (MTT) in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (≥ 65 years).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, multicenter study enrolled treatment-naïve HCC patients undergoing TACE combined with ICIs and MTT at three Chinese medical centers from June 2019 to December 2023. The study's primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), with secondary endpoints being the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) per modified RECIST criteria, and adverse events (AEs). To minimize selection bias, propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized for the elderly and younger patient cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort comprised 317 patients, with a median OS of 30.8 months for the overall population. The elderly patients had comparable OS (median, 33.3 vs. 30.4 months, P = 0.219) than younger patients. The PSM cohort included 106 elderly patients and 106 younger patients. After PSM, the elderly patients also had similar OS compared with younger patients (median, 33.3 vs. 24.6 months, P = 0.141). Meanwhile, the elderly patients achieved a similar ORR and DCR (58.5% vs. 54.7%, P = 0.579; 90.1% vs. 85.8%, P = 0.287, respectively) versus younger patients. No obvious differences in grade 3/4 AEs were noted among the two groups, and no new safety concerns arose.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elderly patients (age ≥ 65 years) receiving TACE combined with ICIs and MTT showed similar trends in prognosis and safety profiles compared with younger patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"151 7\",\"pages\":\"202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12226637/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-025-06257-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-025-06257-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)联合免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)联合分子靶向治疗(MTT)治疗老年肝癌(≥65岁)的疗效和耐受性。方法:这项回顾性、多中心研究纳入了2019年6月至2023年12月在中国三家医疗中心接受TACE联合ICIs和MTT治疗的treatment-naïve HCC患者。该研究的主要终点是总生存期(OS),次要终点是客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)和不良事件(ae)。为了尽量减少选择偏差,倾向评分匹配(PSM)用于老年和年轻患者队列。结果:研究队列包括317例患者,总体人群的中位生存期为30.8个月。老年患者的OS(中位数,33.3个月vs 30.4个月,P = 0.219)与年轻患者相当。PSM队列包括106名老年患者和106名年轻患者。PSM后,老年患者的OS与年轻患者相似(中位数,33.3个月vs 24.6个月,P = 0.141)。老年患者ORR和DCR相似(58.5% vs. 54.7%, P = 0.579;90.1% vs. 85.8%, P = 0.287)。两组间3/4级ae无明显差异,未出现新的安全性问题。结论:老年患者(年龄≥65岁)接受TACE联合ICIs和MTT治疗与年轻患者相比,预后和安全性趋势相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and efficacy of TACE combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors plus molecular targeted therapies in older adults with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Objectives: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus molecular targeted therapies (MTT) in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (≥ 65 years).

Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study enrolled treatment-naïve HCC patients undergoing TACE combined with ICIs and MTT at three Chinese medical centers from June 2019 to December 2023. The study's primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), with secondary endpoints being the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) per modified RECIST criteria, and adverse events (AEs). To minimize selection bias, propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized for the elderly and younger patient cohorts.

Results: The study cohort comprised 317 patients, with a median OS of 30.8 months for the overall population. The elderly patients had comparable OS (median, 33.3 vs. 30.4 months, P = 0.219) than younger patients. The PSM cohort included 106 elderly patients and 106 younger patients. After PSM, the elderly patients also had similar OS compared with younger patients (median, 33.3 vs. 24.6 months, P = 0.141). Meanwhile, the elderly patients achieved a similar ORR and DCR (58.5% vs. 54.7%, P = 0.579; 90.1% vs. 85.8%, P = 0.287, respectively) versus younger patients. No obvious differences in grade 3/4 AEs were noted among the two groups, and no new safety concerns arose.

Conclusions: Elderly patients (age ≥ 65 years) receiving TACE combined with ICIs and MTT showed similar trends in prognosis and safety profiles compared with younger patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
577
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The "Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology" publishes significant and up-to-date articles within the fields of experimental and clinical oncology. The journal, which is chiefly devoted to Original papers, also includes Reviews as well as Editorials and Guest editorials on current, controversial topics. The section Letters to the editors provides a forum for a rapid exchange of comments and information concerning previously published papers and topics of current interest. Meeting reports provide current information on the latest results presented at important congresses. The following fields are covered: carcinogenesis - etiology, mechanisms; molecular biology; recent developments in tumor therapy; general diagnosis; laboratory diagnosis; diagnostic and experimental pathology; oncologic surgery; and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信