设计和比较PCR-ELISA反应与其他可用的杂交方法鉴定11、16和18型人乳头瘤病毒。

IF 1.7 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY
Seyed Mohammad Amin Mousavi-Rad, Shohreh Zare Karizi, Hamid Sedighian, Seyed Ali Mirhosseini, Hadi Esmaeili Gouvarchin Ghaleh, Jafar Amani
{"title":"设计和比较PCR-ELISA反应与其他可用的杂交方法鉴定11、16和18型人乳头瘤病毒。","authors":"Seyed Mohammad Amin Mousavi-Rad, Shohreh Zare Karizi, Hamid Sedighian, Seyed Ali Mirhosseini, Hadi Esmaeili Gouvarchin Ghaleh, Jafar Amani","doi":"10.18502/ijm.v17i3.18832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a significant etiological agent in cervical cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of PCR-ELISA for detecting HPV genotypes 11, 16, and 18 compared to the conventional hybridization methods.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>PCR-ELISA was designed and optimized to detect target HPV genotypes using biotin-labeled probes. Sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility were assessed through intra-assay and inter-assay variability tests. Additionally, a cost-benefit analysis was performed to compare PCR-ELISA with RT-PCR and gel electrophoresis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PCR-ELISA demonstrated high sensitivity (HPV18: 94.92%, HPV16: 98.36%, HPV11: 93.75%) and specificity (100% for all genotypes), with Kappa values ranging from 0.84 to 0.92, indicating strong agreement with the reference standard. Reproducibility analysis showed intra-assay CVs below 5% for most samples and inter-assay CVs within acceptable limits. The cost-benefit analysis revealed significant reductions in reagent and equipment costs compared to RT-PCR, making PCR-ELISA a cost-effective alternative.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCR-ELISA offers a reliable, sensitive and cost-effective method for HPV detection, particularly in resource-limited settings. Its simplicity and compatibility with existing workflows makes it a promising tool for routine diagnostic applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":14633,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Microbiology","volume":"17 3","pages":"488-502"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12218884/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design and comparison of PCR-ELISA reaction with other available hybridization methods to identify types 11, 16, and 18 of the human papillomavirus.\",\"authors\":\"Seyed Mohammad Amin Mousavi-Rad, Shohreh Zare Karizi, Hamid Sedighian, Seyed Ali Mirhosseini, Hadi Esmaeili Gouvarchin Ghaleh, Jafar Amani\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/ijm.v17i3.18832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a significant etiological agent in cervical cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of PCR-ELISA for detecting HPV genotypes 11, 16, and 18 compared to the conventional hybridization methods.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>PCR-ELISA was designed and optimized to detect target HPV genotypes using biotin-labeled probes. Sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility were assessed through intra-assay and inter-assay variability tests. Additionally, a cost-benefit analysis was performed to compare PCR-ELISA with RT-PCR and gel electrophoresis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PCR-ELISA demonstrated high sensitivity (HPV18: 94.92%, HPV16: 98.36%, HPV11: 93.75%) and specificity (100% for all genotypes), with Kappa values ranging from 0.84 to 0.92, indicating strong agreement with the reference standard. Reproducibility analysis showed intra-assay CVs below 5% for most samples and inter-assay CVs within acceptable limits. The cost-benefit analysis revealed significant reductions in reagent and equipment costs compared to RT-PCR, making PCR-ELISA a cost-effective alternative.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCR-ELISA offers a reliable, sensitive and cost-effective method for HPV detection, particularly in resource-limited settings. Its simplicity and compatibility with existing workflows makes it a promising tool for routine diagnostic applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"488-502\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12218884/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijm.v17i3.18832\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijm.v17i3.18832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)是宫颈癌的重要病因。本研究旨在评估PCR-ELISA检测HPV基因型11、16和18的性能,并与传统杂交方法进行比较。材料与方法:设计并优化了PCR-ELISA,利用生物素标记探针检测目标HPV基因型。通过测定内和测定间变异性试验评估敏感性、特异性和重复性。此外,进行了成本效益分析,比较PCR-ELISA与RT-PCR和凝胶电泳。结果:PCR-ELISA具有较高的灵敏度(HPV18: 94.92%, HPV16: 98.36%, HPV11: 93.75%)和特异性(所有基因型均为100%),Kappa值在0.84 ~ 0.92之间,与参考标准吻合较好。重复性分析显示,大多数样品的测定内CVs低于5%,测定间CVs在可接受的范围内。成本效益分析显示,与RT-PCR相比,试剂和设备成本显著降低,使PCR-ELISA成为一种具有成本效益的替代方案。结论:PCR-ELISA是一种可靠、灵敏、经济的HPV检测方法,特别是在资源有限的地区。它的简单性和与现有工作流的兼容性使其成为常规诊断应用程序的有前途的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Design and comparison of PCR-ELISA reaction with other available hybridization methods to identify types 11, 16, and 18 of the human papillomavirus.

Design and comparison of PCR-ELISA reaction with other available hybridization methods to identify types 11, 16, and 18 of the human papillomavirus.

Design and comparison of PCR-ELISA reaction with other available hybridization methods to identify types 11, 16, and 18 of the human papillomavirus.

Design and comparison of PCR-ELISA reaction with other available hybridization methods to identify types 11, 16, and 18 of the human papillomavirus.

Background and objectives: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a significant etiological agent in cervical cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of PCR-ELISA for detecting HPV genotypes 11, 16, and 18 compared to the conventional hybridization methods.

Materials and methods: PCR-ELISA was designed and optimized to detect target HPV genotypes using biotin-labeled probes. Sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility were assessed through intra-assay and inter-assay variability tests. Additionally, a cost-benefit analysis was performed to compare PCR-ELISA with RT-PCR and gel electrophoresis.

Results: PCR-ELISA demonstrated high sensitivity (HPV18: 94.92%, HPV16: 98.36%, HPV11: 93.75%) and specificity (100% for all genotypes), with Kappa values ranging from 0.84 to 0.92, indicating strong agreement with the reference standard. Reproducibility analysis showed intra-assay CVs below 5% for most samples and inter-assay CVs within acceptable limits. The cost-benefit analysis revealed significant reductions in reagent and equipment costs compared to RT-PCR, making PCR-ELISA a cost-effective alternative.

Conclusion: PCR-ELISA offers a reliable, sensitive and cost-effective method for HPV detection, particularly in resource-limited settings. Its simplicity and compatibility with existing workflows makes it a promising tool for routine diagnostic applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Iranian Journal of Microbiology (IJM) is an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-reviewed journal that provides rapid publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of basic and applied research on bacteria and other micro-organisms, including bacteria, viruses, yeasts, fungi, microalgae, and protozoa concerning the development of tools for diagnosis and disease control, epidemiology, antimicrobial agents, clinical microbiology, immunology, Genetics, Genomics and Molecular Biology. Contributions may be in the form of original research papers, review articles, short communications, case reports, technical reports, and letters to the Editor. Research findings must be novel and the original data must be available for review by the Editors, if necessary. Studies that are preliminary, of weak originality or merely descriptive as well as negative results are not appropriate for the journal. Papers considered for publication must be unpublished work (except in an abstract form) that is not under consideration for publication anywhere else, and all co-authors should have agreed to the submission. Manuscripts should be written in English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信