手术腔周围1厘米范围内MRI早期成像生物标志物预测低级别胶质瘤的进展:双中心经验。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Wenfei Li, Xuedong Bai, Mengyu Cheng, Yanguo Li
{"title":"手术腔周围1厘米范围内MRI早期成像生物标志物预测低级别胶质瘤的进展:双中心经验。","authors":"Wenfei Li, Xuedong Bai, Mengyu Cheng, Yanguo Li","doi":"10.1080/00207454.2025.2529233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>More than 80% of postoperative tumor recurrences were within 1 cm of the postoperative tumor margin; therefore, characterizing the cavity microenvironment with a 1 cm margin was valuable for early warning of the progress after Lower grade gliomas (LGGs) surgery.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the clinical utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values within 1 cm of the postoperative tumor margin for predicting the postoperative progression of LGGs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical and imaging data of patients with glioma from the First Hospital of Qinhuangdao and Affiliated Hospital of ChengDe Medical College were collected as the training group and external validation group, respectively. The mean ADC value within 1 cm of the margins surrounding the surgical cavity was measured by two senior radiologists. Patients were divided into high- and low-risk subgroups based on the optimal ADC threshold determined using the X-tile software. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed to capture the differences in progression-free survival (PFS) between the groups. The independent risk factors for PFS were determined using Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The inter-observer agreement was significant for the max ADC (ICC = 0.902) and min ADC (ICC = 0.884). X-tile determined the optimal threshold of the training group to be 1345 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm/s, dividing patients into low-risk and high-risk groups. The high-risk group exhibited a significantly shorter PFS than that of the low-risk group. In the external validation group, poor prognosis in the low-risk group was significantly correlated with mADC. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses indicated that the mADC was an independent risk factor for LGGs recurrence (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ADC values within 1-cm of the margin surrounding the residual cavity are risk factors for the first postoperative progression of LGGs, which should be added in routine postoperative surveillance protocols to predict the PFS of patients with LGG.</p>","PeriodicalId":14161,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early imaging biomarker of MRI within 1-cm margin surrounding surgical cavity predicting the progression of lower grade gliomas: dual-centers experience.\",\"authors\":\"Wenfei Li, Xuedong Bai, Mengyu Cheng, Yanguo Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00207454.2025.2529233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>More than 80% of postoperative tumor recurrences were within 1 cm of the postoperative tumor margin; therefore, characterizing the cavity microenvironment with a 1 cm margin was valuable for early warning of the progress after Lower grade gliomas (LGGs) surgery.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the clinical utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values within 1 cm of the postoperative tumor margin for predicting the postoperative progression of LGGs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical and imaging data of patients with glioma from the First Hospital of Qinhuangdao and Affiliated Hospital of ChengDe Medical College were collected as the training group and external validation group, respectively. The mean ADC value within 1 cm of the margins surrounding the surgical cavity was measured by two senior radiologists. Patients were divided into high- and low-risk subgroups based on the optimal ADC threshold determined using the X-tile software. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed to capture the differences in progression-free survival (PFS) between the groups. The independent risk factors for PFS were determined using Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The inter-observer agreement was significant for the max ADC (ICC = 0.902) and min ADC (ICC = 0.884). X-tile determined the optimal threshold of the training group to be 1345 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm/s, dividing patients into low-risk and high-risk groups. The high-risk group exhibited a significantly shorter PFS than that of the low-risk group. In the external validation group, poor prognosis in the low-risk group was significantly correlated with mADC. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses indicated that the mADC was an independent risk factor for LGGs recurrence (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ADC values within 1-cm of the margin surrounding the residual cavity are risk factors for the first postoperative progression of LGGs, which should be added in routine postoperative surveillance protocols to predict the PFS of patients with LGG.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207454.2025.2529233\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207454.2025.2529233","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导语:80%以上的术后肿瘤复发在术后肿瘤切缘1cm以内;因此,在低级别胶质瘤(LGGs)手术后,用1厘米边缘来表征腔微环境对于早期预警进展是有价值的。目的:探讨术后肿瘤切缘1 cm内表观扩散系数(ADC)值对预测LGGs术后进展的临床应用价值。方法:收集秦皇岛第一医院和承德医学院附属医院的胶质瘤患者的临床和影像学资料,分别作为训练组和外部验证组。由两名资深放射科医生测量手术腔周围边缘1厘米内的平均ADC值。根据使用X-tile软件确定的最佳ADC阈值,将患者分为高风险和低风险亚组。构建Kaplan-Meier生存曲线以捕捉组间无进展生存(PFS)的差异。采用Cox比例风险模型确定PFS的独立危险因素。结果:最大ADC (ICC = 0.902)和最小ADC (ICC = 0.884)的观察者间一致性显著。X-tile确定训练组的最佳阈值为1345 × 10-3mm/s,将患者分为低危组和高危组。高危组的PFS明显短于低危组。在外部验证组中,低危组预后不良与mADC显著相关。单因素和多因素Cox回归分析显示,mADC是LGGs复发的独立危险因素(P < 0.05)。结论:残腔周围边缘1 cm范围内的ADC值是LGG术后首次进展的危险因素,应纳入术后常规监测方案,预测LGG患者的PFS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early imaging biomarker of MRI within 1-cm margin surrounding surgical cavity predicting the progression of lower grade gliomas: dual-centers experience.

Introduction: More than 80% of postoperative tumor recurrences were within 1 cm of the postoperative tumor margin; therefore, characterizing the cavity microenvironment with a 1 cm margin was valuable for early warning of the progress after Lower grade gliomas (LGGs) surgery.

Aim: To investigate the clinical utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values within 1 cm of the postoperative tumor margin for predicting the postoperative progression of LGGs.

Methods: The clinical and imaging data of patients with glioma from the First Hospital of Qinhuangdao and Affiliated Hospital of ChengDe Medical College were collected as the training group and external validation group, respectively. The mean ADC value within 1 cm of the margins surrounding the surgical cavity was measured by two senior radiologists. Patients were divided into high- and low-risk subgroups based on the optimal ADC threshold determined using the X-tile software. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed to capture the differences in progression-free survival (PFS) between the groups. The independent risk factors for PFS were determined using Cox proportional hazards models.

Results: The inter-observer agreement was significant for the max ADC (ICC = 0.902) and min ADC (ICC = 0.884). X-tile determined the optimal threshold of the training group to be 1345 × 10-3 mm/s, dividing patients into low-risk and high-risk groups. The high-risk group exhibited a significantly shorter PFS than that of the low-risk group. In the external validation group, poor prognosis in the low-risk group was significantly correlated with mADC. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses indicated that the mADC was an independent risk factor for LGGs recurrence (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: ADC values within 1-cm of the margin surrounding the residual cavity are risk factors for the first postoperative progression of LGGs, which should be added in routine postoperative surveillance protocols to predict the PFS of patients with LGG.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
132
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Neuroscience publishes original research articles, reviews, brief scientific reports, case studies, letters to the editor and book reviews concerned with problems of the nervous system and related clinical studies, epidemiology, neuropathology, medical and surgical treatment options and outcomes, neuropsychology and other topics related to the research and care of persons with neurologic disorders.  The focus of the journal is clinical and transitional research. Topics covered include but are not limited to: ALS, ataxia, autism, brain tumors, child neurology, demyelinating diseases, epilepsy, genetics, headache, lysosomal storage disease, mitochondrial dysfunction, movement disorders, multiple sclerosis, myopathy, neurodegenerative diseases, neuromuscular disorders, neuropharmacology, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, pain, sleep disorders, stroke, and other areas related to the neurosciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信