糖皮质激素戒断综合征:使用VigiBase数据的病例歧化分析。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Lütfi Mangal, Burcu Eda Arda, Hande Sipahi
{"title":"糖皮质激素戒断综合征:使用VigiBase数据的病例歧化分析。","authors":"Lütfi Mangal, Burcu Eda Arda, Hande Sipahi","doi":"10.1007/s40199-025-00565-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glucocorticoids are associated with withdrawal syndrome, but specific glucocorticoid types that cause severe conditions remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study identified glucocorticoids that exhibit significant pharmacovigilance signals for withdrawal, directly comparing the different types to determine those that exhibit a higher risk. We also aimed to investigate the routes of administration for glucocorticoids that are most likely to cause glucocorticoid withdrawal syndrome (GWS) and identify the age, sex, and regional groups among which GWS is more common.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We extracted the region, severity, age group, sex, and indications from VigiBase reports on GWS from January 2013 to December 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 343,296 adverse drug reactions, 1,713 were withdrawal syndrome, with a higher prevalence among females (60%). Prednisone accounted for 28% of the cases, followed by hydrocortisone (17%) and betamethasone (14%). Case numbers tended to peak in 2021, with the highest incidence between ages 18-44 (36%) and significant regional variations for different glucocorticoids. Most cases (77%) were serious, with 18% requiring prolonged hospitalization. Predominant administration routes were topical for betamethasone, triamcinolone, and hydrocortisone; oral for prednisone and prednisolone; and intravenous for methylprednisolone. Disproportionality signals indicated that hydrocortisone exhibited the highest association with GWS (reporting odds ratio [ROR]: 4.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.59-4.53), followed by betamethasone (ROR: 3.81, 95% CI: 3.35-4.32), triamcinolone (ROR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.83-2.52), and cortisone (ROR: 1.57, 95% CI: 0.99-2.50).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Abrupt withdrawal of glucocorticoid therapy may cause GWS. Healthcare providers should inform patients about the potential risks of withdrawal, particularly when prescribing topical hydrocortisone and betamethasone, topical and nasal triamcinolone, and oral and topical cortisone, to promote safer practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":10888,"journal":{"name":"DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"33 2","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12227388/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glucocorticoid withdrawal syndrome: Disproportionality analysis of cases using VigiBase data.\",\"authors\":\"Lütfi Mangal, Burcu Eda Arda, Hande Sipahi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40199-025-00565-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glucocorticoids are associated with withdrawal syndrome, but specific glucocorticoid types that cause severe conditions remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study identified glucocorticoids that exhibit significant pharmacovigilance signals for withdrawal, directly comparing the different types to determine those that exhibit a higher risk. We also aimed to investigate the routes of administration for glucocorticoids that are most likely to cause glucocorticoid withdrawal syndrome (GWS) and identify the age, sex, and regional groups among which GWS is more common.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We extracted the region, severity, age group, sex, and indications from VigiBase reports on GWS from January 2013 to December 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 343,296 adverse drug reactions, 1,713 were withdrawal syndrome, with a higher prevalence among females (60%). Prednisone accounted for 28% of the cases, followed by hydrocortisone (17%) and betamethasone (14%). Case numbers tended to peak in 2021, with the highest incidence between ages 18-44 (36%) and significant regional variations for different glucocorticoids. Most cases (77%) were serious, with 18% requiring prolonged hospitalization. Predominant administration routes were topical for betamethasone, triamcinolone, and hydrocortisone; oral for prednisone and prednisolone; and intravenous for methylprednisolone. Disproportionality signals indicated that hydrocortisone exhibited the highest association with GWS (reporting odds ratio [ROR]: 4.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.59-4.53), followed by betamethasone (ROR: 3.81, 95% CI: 3.35-4.32), triamcinolone (ROR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.83-2.52), and cortisone (ROR: 1.57, 95% CI: 0.99-2.50).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Abrupt withdrawal of glucocorticoid therapy may cause GWS. Healthcare providers should inform patients about the potential risks of withdrawal, particularly when prescribing topical hydrocortisone and betamethasone, topical and nasal triamcinolone, and oral and topical cortisone, to promote safer practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"33 2\",\"pages\":\"21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12227388/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40199-025-00565-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40199-025-00565-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:糖皮质激素与戒断综合征有关,但导致严重症状的具体糖皮质激素类型尚不清楚。目的:本研究确定糖皮质激素对停药表现出显著的药物警戒信号,直接比较不同类型的糖皮质激素,以确定那些表现出更高的风险。我们还旨在研究最可能引起糖皮质激素戒断综合征(GWS)的糖皮质激素给药途径,并确定GWS更常见的年龄、性别和地区群体。方法:从2013年1月至2023年12月的VigiBase报告中提取GWS的地区、严重程度、年龄组、性别和适应症。结果:343,296例药物不良反应中,戒断综合征1713例,女性发生率较高(60%)。强的松占28%,其次是氢化可的松(17%)和倍他米松(14%)。病例数在2021年达到高峰,18-44岁年龄段发病率最高(36%),不同糖皮质激素的地区差异显著。大多数病例(77%)严重,其中18%需要长期住院治疗。主要给药途径是外用倍他米松、曲安奈德和氢化可的松;口服强的松和泼尼松;静脉注射甲基强的松龙。歧化信号表明,氢化可的松与GWS的相关性最高(报告比值比[ROR]: 4.04, 95%可信区间[CI]: 3.59-4.53),其次是倍他米松(ROR: 3.81, 95% CI: 3.35-4.32)、曲安西诺酮(ROR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.83-2.52)和可的松(ROR: 1.57, 95% CI: 0.99-2.50)。结论:突然停止糖皮质激素治疗可引起GWS。医疗保健提供者应告知患者停药的潜在风险,特别是在开外用氢化可的松和倍他米松、外用和鼻用曲安奈德、口服和外用可的松时,以促进更安全的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Glucocorticoid withdrawal syndrome: Disproportionality analysis of cases using VigiBase data.

Background: Glucocorticoids are associated with withdrawal syndrome, but specific glucocorticoid types that cause severe conditions remain unclear.

Objectives: This study identified glucocorticoids that exhibit significant pharmacovigilance signals for withdrawal, directly comparing the different types to determine those that exhibit a higher risk. We also aimed to investigate the routes of administration for glucocorticoids that are most likely to cause glucocorticoid withdrawal syndrome (GWS) and identify the age, sex, and regional groups among which GWS is more common.

Methods: We extracted the region, severity, age group, sex, and indications from VigiBase reports on GWS from January 2013 to December 2023.

Results: Among 343,296 adverse drug reactions, 1,713 were withdrawal syndrome, with a higher prevalence among females (60%). Prednisone accounted for 28% of the cases, followed by hydrocortisone (17%) and betamethasone (14%). Case numbers tended to peak in 2021, with the highest incidence between ages 18-44 (36%) and significant regional variations for different glucocorticoids. Most cases (77%) were serious, with 18% requiring prolonged hospitalization. Predominant administration routes were topical for betamethasone, triamcinolone, and hydrocortisone; oral for prednisone and prednisolone; and intravenous for methylprednisolone. Disproportionality signals indicated that hydrocortisone exhibited the highest association with GWS (reporting odds ratio [ROR]: 4.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.59-4.53), followed by betamethasone (ROR: 3.81, 95% CI: 3.35-4.32), triamcinolone (ROR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.83-2.52), and cortisone (ROR: 1.57, 95% CI: 0.99-2.50).

Conclusion: Abrupt withdrawal of glucocorticoid therapy may cause GWS. Healthcare providers should inform patients about the potential risks of withdrawal, particularly when prescribing topical hydrocortisone and betamethasone, topical and nasal triamcinolone, and oral and topical cortisone, to promote safer practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences is a peer-reviewed journal published on behalf of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. The journal encompasses all fields of the pharmaceutical sciences and presents timely research on all areas of drug conception, design, manufacture, classification and assessment. The term DARU is derived from the Persian name meaning drug or medicine. This journal is a unique platform to improve the knowledge of researchers and scientists by publishing novel articles including basic and clinical investigations from members of the global scientific community in the forms of original articles, systematic or narrative reviews, meta-analyses, letters, and short communications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信