新的CAC弥散度和密度评分预测心肌梗死和心血管死亡率。

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Gavin Huangfu, Abdul R Ihdayhid, Simon Kwok, John Konstantopoulos, Kai Niu, Juan Lu, Harry Smallbone, Gemma A Figtree, Clara K Chow, Lawrence Dembo, Brendan Adler, Christian Hamilton-Craig, Stuart M Grieve, Matthew T V Chan, Craig Butler, Vikas Tandon, Peter Nagele, Pamela K Woodard, Marko Mrkobrada, Wojciech Szczeklik, Yang Faridah Abdul Aziz, Bruce Biccard, Philip James Devereaux, Tej Sheth, Girish Dwivedi, Benjamin J W Chow
{"title":"新的CAC弥散度和密度评分预测心肌梗死和心血管死亡率。","authors":"Gavin Huangfu, Abdul R Ihdayhid, Simon Kwok, John Konstantopoulos, Kai Niu, Juan Lu, Harry Smallbone, Gemma A Figtree, Clara K Chow, Lawrence Dembo, Brendan Adler, Christian Hamilton-Craig, Stuart M Grieve, Matthew T V Chan, Craig Butler, Vikas Tandon, Peter Nagele, Pamela K Woodard, Marko Mrkobrada, Wojciech Szczeklik, Yang Faridah Abdul Aziz, Bruce Biccard, Philip James Devereaux, Tej Sheth, Girish Dwivedi, Benjamin J W Chow","doi":"10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.125.018059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary artery calcification (CAC) provides robust prediction for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), but current techniques disregard plaque distribution and protective effects of high CAC density. We investigated whether a novel CAC-dispersion and density (CAC-DAD) score will exhibit superior prognostic value compared with the Agatston score (AS) for MACE prediction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, cross-sectional study of 961 patients (median age, 67 years; 61% male) who underwent cardiac computed tomography for cardiovascular or perioperative risk assessment. Blinded analyzers applied deep learning algorithms to noncontrast scans to calculate the CAC-DAD score, which adjusts for the spatial distribution of CAC and assigns a protective weight factor for lesions with ≥1000 Hounsfield units. Associations were assessed using frailty regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a median follow-up of 30 (30-460) days, 61 patients experienced MACE (nonfatal myocardial infarction or cardiovascular mortality). An elevated CAC-DAD score (≥2050 based on optimal cutoff) captured more MACE than AS ≥400 (74% versus 57%; <i>P</i>=0.002). Univariable analysis revealed that an elevated CAC-DAD score, AS ≥400 and AS ≥100, age, diabetes, hypertension, and statin use predicted MACE. On multivariable analysis, only the CAC-DAD score (hazard ratio, 2.57 [95% CI, 1.43-4.61]; <i>P</i>=0.002), age, statins, and diabetes remained significant. The inclusion of the CAC-DAD score in a predictive model containing demographic factors and AS improved the C statistic from 0.61 to 0.66 (<i>P</i>=0.008).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The fully automated CAC-DAD score improves MACE prediction compared with the AS. Patients with a high CAC-DAD score, including those with a low AS, may be at higher risk and warrant intensification of their preventative therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10202,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"e018059"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel CAC Dispersion and Density Score to Predict Myocardial Infarction and Cardiovascular Mortality.\",\"authors\":\"Gavin Huangfu, Abdul R Ihdayhid, Simon Kwok, John Konstantopoulos, Kai Niu, Juan Lu, Harry Smallbone, Gemma A Figtree, Clara K Chow, Lawrence Dembo, Brendan Adler, Christian Hamilton-Craig, Stuart M Grieve, Matthew T V Chan, Craig Butler, Vikas Tandon, Peter Nagele, Pamela K Woodard, Marko Mrkobrada, Wojciech Szczeklik, Yang Faridah Abdul Aziz, Bruce Biccard, Philip James Devereaux, Tej Sheth, Girish Dwivedi, Benjamin J W Chow\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.125.018059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary artery calcification (CAC) provides robust prediction for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), but current techniques disregard plaque distribution and protective effects of high CAC density. We investigated whether a novel CAC-dispersion and density (CAC-DAD) score will exhibit superior prognostic value compared with the Agatston score (AS) for MACE prediction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, cross-sectional study of 961 patients (median age, 67 years; 61% male) who underwent cardiac computed tomography for cardiovascular or perioperative risk assessment. Blinded analyzers applied deep learning algorithms to noncontrast scans to calculate the CAC-DAD score, which adjusts for the spatial distribution of CAC and assigns a protective weight factor for lesions with ≥1000 Hounsfield units. Associations were assessed using frailty regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a median follow-up of 30 (30-460) days, 61 patients experienced MACE (nonfatal myocardial infarction or cardiovascular mortality). An elevated CAC-DAD score (≥2050 based on optimal cutoff) captured more MACE than AS ≥400 (74% versus 57%; <i>P</i>=0.002). Univariable analysis revealed that an elevated CAC-DAD score, AS ≥400 and AS ≥100, age, diabetes, hypertension, and statin use predicted MACE. On multivariable analysis, only the CAC-DAD score (hazard ratio, 2.57 [95% CI, 1.43-4.61]; <i>P</i>=0.002), age, statins, and diabetes remained significant. The inclusion of the CAC-DAD score in a predictive model containing demographic factors and AS improved the C statistic from 0.61 to 0.66 (<i>P</i>=0.008).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The fully automated CAC-DAD score improves MACE prediction compared with the AS. Patients with a high CAC-DAD score, including those with a low AS, may be at higher risk and warrant intensification of their preventative therapies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e018059\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.125.018059\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.125.018059","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:冠状动脉钙化(CAC)为主要不良心血管事件(MACE)提供了可靠的预测,但目前的技术忽视了斑块分布和高CAC密度的保护作用。我们研究了一种新的cac -弥散和密度(CAC-DAD)评分是否比Agatston评分(AS)在MACE预测方面具有更好的预后价值。方法:我们对961例患者进行了一项多中心、回顾性、横断面研究(中位年龄67岁;61%男性)接受心脏计算机断层扫描进行心血管或围手术期风险评估。盲法分析将深度学习算法应用于非对比扫描来计算CAC- dad评分,该评分根据CAC的空间分布进行调整,并为≥1000 Hounsfield单位的病变分配保护权重因子。使用脆弱性回归评估相关性。结果:在中位30(30-460)天的随访中,61例患者出现了MACE(非致死性心肌梗死或心血管死亡)。CAC-DAD评分升高(基于最佳截止值≥2050)比AS≥400 (74% vs 57%;P = 0.002)。单变量分析显示,CAC-DAD评分升高、AS≥400和AS≥100、年龄、糖尿病、高血压和他汀类药物使用可预测MACE。在多变量分析中,只有CAC-DAD评分(风险比,2.57 [95% CI, 1.43-4.61];P=0.002)、年龄、他汀类药物和糖尿病仍然具有显著性。在包含人口统计学因素和AS的预测模型中纳入CAC-DAD评分将C统计量从0.61提高到0.66 (P=0.008)。结论:与AS相比,全自动CAC-DAD评分可改善MACE预测。高CAC-DAD评分的患者,包括那些低AS的患者,可能有更高的风险,需要加强他们的预防性治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Novel CAC Dispersion and Density Score to Predict Myocardial Infarction and Cardiovascular Mortality.

Background: Coronary artery calcification (CAC) provides robust prediction for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), but current techniques disregard plaque distribution and protective effects of high CAC density. We investigated whether a novel CAC-dispersion and density (CAC-DAD) score will exhibit superior prognostic value compared with the Agatston score (AS) for MACE prediction.

Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, cross-sectional study of 961 patients (median age, 67 years; 61% male) who underwent cardiac computed tomography for cardiovascular or perioperative risk assessment. Blinded analyzers applied deep learning algorithms to noncontrast scans to calculate the CAC-DAD score, which adjusts for the spatial distribution of CAC and assigns a protective weight factor for lesions with ≥1000 Hounsfield units. Associations were assessed using frailty regression.

Results: Over a median follow-up of 30 (30-460) days, 61 patients experienced MACE (nonfatal myocardial infarction or cardiovascular mortality). An elevated CAC-DAD score (≥2050 based on optimal cutoff) captured more MACE than AS ≥400 (74% versus 57%; P=0.002). Univariable analysis revealed that an elevated CAC-DAD score, AS ≥400 and AS ≥100, age, diabetes, hypertension, and statin use predicted MACE. On multivariable analysis, only the CAC-DAD score (hazard ratio, 2.57 [95% CI, 1.43-4.61]; P=0.002), age, statins, and diabetes remained significant. The inclusion of the CAC-DAD score in a predictive model containing demographic factors and AS improved the C statistic from 0.61 to 0.66 (P=0.008).

Conclusions: The fully automated CAC-DAD score improves MACE prediction compared with the AS. Patients with a high CAC-DAD score, including those with a low AS, may be at higher risk and warrant intensification of their preventative therapies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.70%
发文量
225
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, an American Heart Association journal, publishes high-quality, patient-centric articles focusing on observational studies, clinical trials, and advances in applied (translational) research. The journal features innovative, multimodality approaches to the diagnosis and risk stratification of cardiovascular disease. Modalities covered include echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy, magnetic resonance angiography, cardiac positron emission tomography, noninvasive assessment of vascular and endothelial function, radionuclide imaging, molecular imaging, and others. Article types considered by Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging include Original Research, Research Letters, Advances in Cardiovascular Imaging, Clinical Implications of Molecular Imaging Research, How to Use Imaging, Translating Novel Imaging Technologies into Clinical Applications, and Cardiovascular Images.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信