道德困境焦点问题导论

IF 0.3 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Tucker J. Gregor
{"title":"道德困境焦点问题导论","authors":"Tucker J. Gregor","doi":"10.1111/jore.12495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The idea for this issue began with an inquiry from Edmund N. Santurri to the <i>Journal of Religious Ethics</i> (JRE) coeditors. Santurri expressed interest in reaffirming the anti-dilemma position that he articulated in <i>Perplexity in the Moral Life: Philosophical and Theological Considerations</i> (1987) but with consideration of more recent scholarship on the topic. By contrast, Lisa Sowle Cahill and Kate Jackson-Meyer reaffirm and defend the plausibility of the moral dilemmas thesis articulated in their scholarship (see Cahill 2019 and Jackson-Meyer 2022). While these first two essays draw on resources from Christian ethics, Schillinger and coauthors Howard and Cates enrich the conversation by offering Islamic and Hindu insights that complicate Christian assumptions about moral dilemmas.</p>","PeriodicalId":45722,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS","volume":"53 1","pages":"6-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jore.12495","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction to the Focus Issue on Moral Dilemmas\",\"authors\":\"Tucker J. Gregor\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jore.12495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The idea for this issue began with an inquiry from Edmund N. Santurri to the <i>Journal of Religious Ethics</i> (JRE) coeditors. Santurri expressed interest in reaffirming the anti-dilemma position that he articulated in <i>Perplexity in the Moral Life: Philosophical and Theological Considerations</i> (1987) but with consideration of more recent scholarship on the topic. By contrast, Lisa Sowle Cahill and Kate Jackson-Meyer reaffirm and defend the plausibility of the moral dilemmas thesis articulated in their scholarship (see Cahill 2019 and Jackson-Meyer 2022). While these first two essays draw on resources from Christian ethics, Schillinger and coauthors Howard and Cates enrich the conversation by offering Islamic and Hindu insights that complicate Christian assumptions about moral dilemmas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"6-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jore.12495\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jore.12495\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jore.12495","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这个问题的想法始于埃德蒙·n·桑图里对《宗教伦理杂志》(JRE)共同编辑的一次询问。Santurri表示有兴趣重申他在《道德生活中的困惑:哲学和神学思考》(1987)中阐述的反困境立场,但考虑到最近关于该主题的学术研究。相比之下,丽莎·索勒·卡希尔和凯特·杰克逊-迈耶重申并捍卫了他们在学术研究中阐述的道德困境论点的合理性(见卡希尔2019和杰克逊-迈耶2022)。虽然前两篇文章借鉴了基督教伦理的资源,但Schillinger和合著者Howard和gates通过提供伊斯兰教和印度教的见解,使基督教关于道德困境的假设复杂化,从而丰富了对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introduction to the Focus Issue on Moral Dilemmas

The idea for this issue began with an inquiry from Edmund N. Santurri to the Journal of Religious Ethics (JRE) coeditors. Santurri expressed interest in reaffirming the anti-dilemma position that he articulated in Perplexity in the Moral Life: Philosophical and Theological Considerations (1987) but with consideration of more recent scholarship on the topic. By contrast, Lisa Sowle Cahill and Kate Jackson-Meyer reaffirm and defend the plausibility of the moral dilemmas thesis articulated in their scholarship (see Cahill 2019 and Jackson-Meyer 2022). While these first two essays draw on resources from Christian ethics, Schillinger and coauthors Howard and Cates enrich the conversation by offering Islamic and Hindu insights that complicate Christian assumptions about moral dilemmas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Founded in 1973, the Journal of Religious Ethics is committed to publishing the very best scholarship in religious ethics, to fostering new work in neglected areas, and to stimulating exchange on significant issues. Emphasizing comparative religious ethics, foundational conceptual and methodological issues in religious ethics, and historical studies of influential figures and texts, each issue contains independent essays, commissioned articles, and a book review essay, as well as a Letters, Notes, and Comments section. Published primarily for scholars working in ethics, religious studies, history of religions, and theology, the journal is also of interest to scholars working in related fields such as philosophy, history, social and political theory, and literary studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信