Laís Kawamata de Jesus, Henrique Hadad, Luis Fernando Alves da Silva, Letícia Gabriella de Souza Rodrigues, Ana Flávia Piquera Santos, Thallita Pereira Queiroz, Rodolfo Debone Piazza, Fernando Pozzi Semeghini Guastaldi, Pier Paolo Poli, Carlo Maiorana, Antonio Carlos Guastaldi, Roberta Okamoto, Francisley Ávila Souza
{"title":"商用纯钛或钛铝钒合金种植体有或没有激光表面修饰的种植体周围骨修复的评价","authors":"Laís Kawamata de Jesus, Henrique Hadad, Luis Fernando Alves da Silva, Letícia Gabriella de Souza Rodrigues, Ana Flávia Piquera Santos, Thallita Pereira Queiroz, Rodolfo Debone Piazza, Fernando Pozzi Semeghini Guastaldi, Pier Paolo Poli, Carlo Maiorana, Antonio Carlos Guastaldi, Roberta Okamoto, Francisley Ávila Souza","doi":"10.1002/jbm.b.35610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>To evaluate the peri-implant bone repair of implants manufactured from commercially pure titanium <i>(cp-Ti)</i> or titanium-aluminum-vanadium alloy <i>(Ti-6Al-4 V)</i> with machined <i>(MS)</i> or laser-modified <i>(LS)</i> surfaces. Implants (<i>n</i> = 192) were installed in the tibias of 96 rats and divided according to the implant installed: (1) cpMS: <i>cp-Ti</i> with an MS surface, (2) cpLS: <i>cp-Ti</i> with an LS surface, (3) alloyMS: <i>Ti-6Al-4 V</i> with an MS surface, and (4) alloyLS: <i>Ti-6Al-4 V</i> with an LS surface. Scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive X-ray (SEM–EDX) analysis was performed prior to implant placement. At 14, 21, and 42 days, biomechanical analysis, SEM–EDX of the removed implants, and measurement of the percentage of bone-implant contact (%BIC) and neoformed bone area (%NBA) were performed. At 42 days, the mineral apposition rate (MAR) and bone dynamics were analyzed. At 14 and 21 days, the alloyLS group showed higher removal torque values than cpLS (<i>p</i> < 0.05). For SEM–EDX, the cpLS and alloyLS groups showed surfaces covered by bone tissue and higher peaks of calcium and phosphorus. No statistical differences were observed for %BIC, and at 14 days, a higher %NBA was found for alloyLS than cpLS (<i>p</i> < 0.05). At 42 days, in bone dynamics, alloyLS showed a higher amount of calcein compared to cpLS (<i>p</i> < 0.05), and higher MAR values were observed for cpLS (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The alloyLS group promoted accelerated peri-implant bone repair at 14 and 21 days. However, at 42 days, cpLS surpassed the values of removal torque, %BIC, %NBA, bone dynamics, and MAR.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15269,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","volume":"113 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Peri-Implant Bone Repair of Commercially Pure Titanium or Titanium-Aluminum-Vanadium Alloy Implants With or Without Laser-Modified Surface\",\"authors\":\"Laís Kawamata de Jesus, Henrique Hadad, Luis Fernando Alves da Silva, Letícia Gabriella de Souza Rodrigues, Ana Flávia Piquera Santos, Thallita Pereira Queiroz, Rodolfo Debone Piazza, Fernando Pozzi Semeghini Guastaldi, Pier Paolo Poli, Carlo Maiorana, Antonio Carlos Guastaldi, Roberta Okamoto, Francisley Ávila Souza\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jbm.b.35610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>To evaluate the peri-implant bone repair of implants manufactured from commercially pure titanium <i>(cp-Ti)</i> or titanium-aluminum-vanadium alloy <i>(Ti-6Al-4 V)</i> with machined <i>(MS)</i> or laser-modified <i>(LS)</i> surfaces. Implants (<i>n</i> = 192) were installed in the tibias of 96 rats and divided according to the implant installed: (1) cpMS: <i>cp-Ti</i> with an MS surface, (2) cpLS: <i>cp-Ti</i> with an LS surface, (3) alloyMS: <i>Ti-6Al-4 V</i> with an MS surface, and (4) alloyLS: <i>Ti-6Al-4 V</i> with an LS surface. Scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive X-ray (SEM–EDX) analysis was performed prior to implant placement. At 14, 21, and 42 days, biomechanical analysis, SEM–EDX of the removed implants, and measurement of the percentage of bone-implant contact (%BIC) and neoformed bone area (%NBA) were performed. At 42 days, the mineral apposition rate (MAR) and bone dynamics were analyzed. At 14 and 21 days, the alloyLS group showed higher removal torque values than cpLS (<i>p</i> < 0.05). For SEM–EDX, the cpLS and alloyLS groups showed surfaces covered by bone tissue and higher peaks of calcium and phosphorus. No statistical differences were observed for %BIC, and at 14 days, a higher %NBA was found for alloyLS than cpLS (<i>p</i> < 0.05). At 42 days, in bone dynamics, alloyLS showed a higher amount of calcein compared to cpLS (<i>p</i> < 0.05), and higher MAR values were observed for cpLS (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The alloyLS group promoted accelerated peri-implant bone repair at 14 and 21 days. However, at 42 days, cpLS surpassed the values of removal torque, %BIC, %NBA, bone dynamics, and MAR.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials\",\"volume\":\"113 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.b.35610\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.b.35610","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of Peri-Implant Bone Repair of Commercially Pure Titanium or Titanium-Aluminum-Vanadium Alloy Implants With or Without Laser-Modified Surface
To evaluate the peri-implant bone repair of implants manufactured from commercially pure titanium (cp-Ti) or titanium-aluminum-vanadium alloy (Ti-6Al-4 V) with machined (MS) or laser-modified (LS) surfaces. Implants (n = 192) were installed in the tibias of 96 rats and divided according to the implant installed: (1) cpMS: cp-Ti with an MS surface, (2) cpLS: cp-Ti with an LS surface, (3) alloyMS: Ti-6Al-4 V with an MS surface, and (4) alloyLS: Ti-6Al-4 V with an LS surface. Scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive X-ray (SEM–EDX) analysis was performed prior to implant placement. At 14, 21, and 42 days, biomechanical analysis, SEM–EDX of the removed implants, and measurement of the percentage of bone-implant contact (%BIC) and neoformed bone area (%NBA) were performed. At 42 days, the mineral apposition rate (MAR) and bone dynamics were analyzed. At 14 and 21 days, the alloyLS group showed higher removal torque values than cpLS (p < 0.05). For SEM–EDX, the cpLS and alloyLS groups showed surfaces covered by bone tissue and higher peaks of calcium and phosphorus. No statistical differences were observed for %BIC, and at 14 days, a higher %NBA was found for alloyLS than cpLS (p < 0.05). At 42 days, in bone dynamics, alloyLS showed a higher amount of calcein compared to cpLS (p < 0.05), and higher MAR values were observed for cpLS (p < 0.05). The alloyLS group promoted accelerated peri-implant bone repair at 14 and 21 days. However, at 42 days, cpLS surpassed the values of removal torque, %BIC, %NBA, bone dynamics, and MAR.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is a highly interdisciplinary peer-reviewed journal serving the needs of biomaterials professionals who design, develop, produce and apply biomaterials and medical devices. It has the common focus of biomaterials applied to the human body and covers all disciplines where medical devices are used. Papers are published on biomaterials related to medical device development and manufacture, degradation in the body, nano- and biomimetic- biomaterials interactions, mechanics of biomaterials, implant retrieval and analysis, tissue-biomaterial surface interactions, wound healing, infection, drug delivery, standards and regulation of devices, animal and pre-clinical studies of biomaterials and medical devices, and tissue-biopolymer-material combination products. Manuscripts are published in one of six formats:
• original research reports
• short research and development reports
• scientific reviews
• current concepts articles
• special reports
• editorials
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is an official journal of the Society for Biomaterials, Japanese Society for Biomaterials, the Australasian Society for Biomaterials, and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. Manuscripts from all countries are invited but must be in English. Authors are not required to be members of the affiliated Societies, but members of these societies are encouraged to submit their work to the journal for consideration.