记忆、优点和沉默的机制:在不公开的系统中重建完整性

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Arif Hakan Önder
{"title":"记忆、优点和沉默的机制:在不公开的系统中重建完整性","authors":"Arif Hakan Önder","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Financial conflicts of interest (FCOI) are not always visible through misconduct they often operate through omission, invisibility, and routine repetition, often through unexamined speaking roles or symbolic visibility. In healthcare systems lacking formal disclosure mechanisms or institutional memory, FCOI are less an exception and more a design feature, distributing academic visibility and symbolic authority disproportionately.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This perspective aims to critically analyze how the absence of systemic transparency in certain medical environments including transitional or under-regulated systems such as Turkey facilitates a reputational economy where authority is constructed through repetition rather than scholarly merit.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Drawing on conceptual parallels with existing international disclosure models (Open Payments, EFPIA Code), this essay contrasts systems of declared, searchable FCOI with those where neither institutional structure nor academic culture demand accountability. Using Turkey’s oncology field as a case-in-point, it demonstrates how visible engagement can obscure epistemic contribution (i.e., the actual production of original scientific knowledge) and suppress structural reform.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In systems where authorship does not shape clinical influence or academic appointment, FCOI becomes embedded in symbolic practices: recurrent speaking roles, unexamined moderator positions, and honoraria-driven visibility. These patterns normalize a closed loop of validation, where symbolic authority reproduces itself and resists self-correction.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Restoring integrity requires more than individual virtue it demands institutional tools that remember what systems have ignored. Transparency must be procedural, not performative. Ethics must evolve into structure. Conflict cannot be managed if it cannot be mapped. Only then can ethics move from aspiration to architecture. In systems that forget, memory must be rebuilt as an instrument of reform.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 100617"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Memory, merit, and the machinery of silence: Reconstructing integrity in systems that do not disclose\",\"authors\":\"Arif Hakan Önder\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100617\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Financial conflicts of interest (FCOI) are not always visible through misconduct they often operate through omission, invisibility, and routine repetition, often through unexamined speaking roles or symbolic visibility. In healthcare systems lacking formal disclosure mechanisms or institutional memory, FCOI are less an exception and more a design feature, distributing academic visibility and symbolic authority disproportionately.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This perspective aims to critically analyze how the absence of systemic transparency in certain medical environments including transitional or under-regulated systems such as Turkey facilitates a reputational economy where authority is constructed through repetition rather than scholarly merit.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Drawing on conceptual parallels with existing international disclosure models (Open Payments, EFPIA Code), this essay contrasts systems of declared, searchable FCOI with those where neither institutional structure nor academic culture demand accountability. Using Turkey’s oncology field as a case-in-point, it demonstrates how visible engagement can obscure epistemic contribution (i.e., the actual production of original scientific knowledge) and suppress structural reform.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In systems where authorship does not shape clinical influence or academic appointment, FCOI becomes embedded in symbolic practices: recurrent speaking roles, unexamined moderator positions, and honoraria-driven visibility. These patterns normalize a closed loop of validation, where symbolic authority reproduces itself and resists self-correction.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Restoring integrity requires more than individual virtue it demands institutional tools that remember what systems have ignored. Transparency must be procedural, not performative. Ethics must evolve into structure. Conflict cannot be managed if it cannot be mapped. Only then can ethics move from aspiration to architecture. In systems that forget, memory must be rebuilt as an instrument of reform.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Policy\",\"volume\":\"45 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100617\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221353832500061X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221353832500061X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

财务利益冲突(FCOI)并不总是通过不当行为可见,它们通常通过遗漏、隐形和常规重复,通常通过未经审查的发言角色或象征性的可见性来实现。在缺乏正式披露机制或机构记忆的医疗保健系统中,FCOI与其说是一个例外,不如说是一种设计特征,它不成比例地分配了学术知名度和象征性权威。本视角旨在批判性地分析某些医疗环境(包括过渡或监管不足的系统,如土耳其)中缺乏系统透明度如何促进声誉经济,在声誉经济中,权威是通过重复而不是学术价值构建的。方法利用与现有国际披露模式(开放支付、EFPIA代码)在概念上的相似之处,本文将申报、可搜索的FCOI系统与那些制度结构和学术文化都不要求问责的FCOI系统进行了对比。以土耳其的肿瘤学领域为例,它展示了可见的参与如何掩盖知识贡献(即原始科学知识的实际生产)并抑制结构改革。结果在作者身份不影响临床影响或学术任命的系统中,FCOI被嵌入到象征性实践中:反复出现的演讲角色、未经审查的主持人职位和荣誉驱动的可见度。这些模式规范了一个验证的闭环,在这个闭环中,象征性权威会自我复制,并抵制自我纠正。结论:恢复诚信需要的不仅仅是个人的美德,还需要制度性的工具来记住系统所忽略的东西。透明度必须是程序性的,而不是表现性的。道德必须演变成结构。如果不能映射冲突,冲突就无法管理。只有这样,伦理才能从理想走向建筑。在遗忘的体制中,必须重建记忆,将其作为改革的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Memory, merit, and the machinery of silence: Reconstructing integrity in systems that do not disclose

Background

Financial conflicts of interest (FCOI) are not always visible through misconduct they often operate through omission, invisibility, and routine repetition, often through unexamined speaking roles or symbolic visibility. In healthcare systems lacking formal disclosure mechanisms or institutional memory, FCOI are less an exception and more a design feature, distributing academic visibility and symbolic authority disproportionately.

Objective

This perspective aims to critically analyze how the absence of systemic transparency in certain medical environments including transitional or under-regulated systems such as Turkey facilitates a reputational economy where authority is constructed through repetition rather than scholarly merit.

Methods

Drawing on conceptual parallels with existing international disclosure models (Open Payments, EFPIA Code), this essay contrasts systems of declared, searchable FCOI with those where neither institutional structure nor academic culture demand accountability. Using Turkey’s oncology field as a case-in-point, it demonstrates how visible engagement can obscure epistemic contribution (i.e., the actual production of original scientific knowledge) and suppress structural reform.

Results

In systems where authorship does not shape clinical influence or academic appointment, FCOI becomes embedded in symbolic practices: recurrent speaking roles, unexamined moderator positions, and honoraria-driven visibility. These patterns normalize a closed loop of validation, where symbolic authority reproduces itself and resists self-correction.

Conclusion

Restoring integrity requires more than individual virtue it demands institutional tools that remember what systems have ignored. Transparency must be procedural, not performative. Ethics must evolve into structure. Conflict cannot be managed if it cannot be mapped. Only then can ethics move from aspiration to architecture. In systems that forget, memory must be rebuilt as an instrument of reform.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Policy
Journal of Cancer Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
47
审稿时长
65 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信