ERCP优先与手术优先:儿童胆总管结石的比较研究

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Wesley Judy , Micaela K Gomez , Quin Liu , Lucas Neff
{"title":"ERCP优先与手术优先:儿童胆总管结石的比较研究","authors":"Wesley Judy ,&nbsp;Micaela K Gomez ,&nbsp;Quin Liu ,&nbsp;Lucas Neff","doi":"10.1016/j.sempedsurg.2025.151501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pediatric choledocholithiasis is a rare but increasingly recognized disease process that is predominantly managed with either an “endoscopy-first” or “surgery-first” (SF) approach. In the endoscopy-first approach, a preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is performed with subsequent cholecystectomy. In contrast, the surgery-first approach is a single-stage procedure that includes a laparoscopic cholecystectomy and intraoperative cholangiogram, followed by a laparoscopic common bile duct exploration when indicated. Recent studies have highlighted the potential advantages of the SF approach. However, no standardized treatment algorithm exists, and institutional capabilities and practicing patterns heavily influence management decisions. This point-counterpoint review explores both approaches, analyzing their effects on clinical outcomes and healthcare resources. Continued research and a multidisciplinary approach are needed to develop consensus-driven treatment algorithms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49543,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Pediatric Surgery","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 151501"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ERCP first vs. surgery first: A comparative perspective in pediatric choledocholithiasis\",\"authors\":\"Wesley Judy ,&nbsp;Micaela K Gomez ,&nbsp;Quin Liu ,&nbsp;Lucas Neff\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sempedsurg.2025.151501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Pediatric choledocholithiasis is a rare but increasingly recognized disease process that is predominantly managed with either an “endoscopy-first” or “surgery-first” (SF) approach. In the endoscopy-first approach, a preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is performed with subsequent cholecystectomy. In contrast, the surgery-first approach is a single-stage procedure that includes a laparoscopic cholecystectomy and intraoperative cholangiogram, followed by a laparoscopic common bile duct exploration when indicated. Recent studies have highlighted the potential advantages of the SF approach. However, no standardized treatment algorithm exists, and institutional capabilities and practicing patterns heavily influence management decisions. This point-counterpoint review explores both approaches, analyzing their effects on clinical outcomes and healthcare resources. Continued research and a multidisciplinary approach are needed to develop consensus-driven treatment algorithms.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Pediatric Surgery\",\"volume\":\"34 \",\"pages\":\"Article 151501\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Pediatric Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1055858625000320\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Pediatric Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1055858625000320","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

小儿胆总管结石是一种罕见但越来越被认可的疾病过程,主要采用“内窥镜优先”或“手术优先”(SF)方法进行治疗。在内镜先入路中,术前行内镜逆行胆管造影,随后行胆囊切除术。相比之下,手术先入路是一种单阶段手术,包括腹腔镜胆囊切除术和术中胆管造影,然后在需要时进行腹腔镜胆总管探查。最近的研究强调了SF方法的潜在优势。然而,没有标准化的治疗算法存在,机构能力和实践模式严重影响管理决策。这篇点对点综述探讨了这两种方法,分析了它们对临床结果和医疗资源的影响。需要持续的研究和多学科方法来制定共识驱动的治疗算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ERCP first vs. surgery first: A comparative perspective in pediatric choledocholithiasis
Pediatric choledocholithiasis is a rare but increasingly recognized disease process that is predominantly managed with either an “endoscopy-first” or “surgery-first” (SF) approach. In the endoscopy-first approach, a preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is performed with subsequent cholecystectomy. In contrast, the surgery-first approach is a single-stage procedure that includes a laparoscopic cholecystectomy and intraoperative cholangiogram, followed by a laparoscopic common bile duct exploration when indicated. Recent studies have highlighted the potential advantages of the SF approach. However, no standardized treatment algorithm exists, and institutional capabilities and practicing patterns heavily influence management decisions. This point-counterpoint review explores both approaches, analyzing their effects on clinical outcomes and healthcare resources. Continued research and a multidisciplinary approach are needed to develop consensus-driven treatment algorithms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Pediatric Surgery
Seminars in Pediatric Surgery PEDIATRICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
57
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Pediatric Surgery provides current state-of-the-art reviews of subjects of interest to those charged with the surgical care of young patients. Each bimontly issue addresses a single topic with articles written by the experts in the field. Guest editors, all noted authorities, prepare each issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信