Hao Zhang , Fan Yang , Mingke Zhang , Wei Deng , Shaoyao Zhang , Zhanyun Wang
{"title":"结合野外采样反映干旱区生物多样性保护功能","authors":"Hao Zhang , Fan Yang , Mingke Zhang , Wei Deng , Shaoyao Zhang , Zhanyun Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Biodiversity is integral to achieving multiple Sustainable Development Goals, yet global change threatens its preservation in the Anthropocene. While habitat quality (HQ) has emerged as a widely adopted metric for large-scale biodiversity conservation, accurately quantifying HQ changes across same land use types remains challenging. We developed an enhanced model by integrating a composite environmental index with field data (plant biomass and biodiversity index) into the InVEST-HQ module, enabling robust spatiotemporal HQ assessment in Xinjiang’s dryland ecosystems from 1990 to 2022. The findings showed that our modifications significantly improved model accuracy, with the correlation coefficient (between actual measurement and evaluation values) increasing from 0.1 to 0.58 in forests and 0.3 to 0.76 in grasslands. InVEST-HQ model showed limited sensitivity to HQ changes, and HQ improved by NDVI exhibited habitat type limitations for HQ assessments. The comparative analysis of HQ trends revealed distinct patterns across modeling approaches. While the original InVEST-HQ model showed minimal temporal variation with slight degradation in the study area, a NDVI-modified result exhibited a marked increment in the area. The HQ modified in this study decreased for plains and increased for mountain areas. Our modified method expresses significant improvement in shrubland HQ (13.9%), grassland HQ (5.7%) and urban HQ (13.7%) and marked decline in forest ecosystems (−4.5%). By incorporating region-specific environmental parameters, our framework reliably captures HQ dynamics even in human-dominated landscapes (e.g., urban/agricultural areas), offering realistic decision-making and data support for ecological conservation in fragile arid.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 113818"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incorporating field sampling to reflect biodiversity protection function in arid region\",\"authors\":\"Hao Zhang , Fan Yang , Mingke Zhang , Wei Deng , Shaoyao Zhang , Zhanyun Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113818\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Biodiversity is integral to achieving multiple Sustainable Development Goals, yet global change threatens its preservation in the Anthropocene. While habitat quality (HQ) has emerged as a widely adopted metric for large-scale biodiversity conservation, accurately quantifying HQ changes across same land use types remains challenging. We developed an enhanced model by integrating a composite environmental index with field data (plant biomass and biodiversity index) into the InVEST-HQ module, enabling robust spatiotemporal HQ assessment in Xinjiang’s dryland ecosystems from 1990 to 2022. The findings showed that our modifications significantly improved model accuracy, with the correlation coefficient (between actual measurement and evaluation values) increasing from 0.1 to 0.58 in forests and 0.3 to 0.76 in grasslands. InVEST-HQ model showed limited sensitivity to HQ changes, and HQ improved by NDVI exhibited habitat type limitations for HQ assessments. The comparative analysis of HQ trends revealed distinct patterns across modeling approaches. While the original InVEST-HQ model showed minimal temporal variation with slight degradation in the study area, a NDVI-modified result exhibited a marked increment in the area. The HQ modified in this study decreased for plains and increased for mountain areas. Our modified method expresses significant improvement in shrubland HQ (13.9%), grassland HQ (5.7%) and urban HQ (13.7%) and marked decline in forest ecosystems (−4.5%). By incorporating region-specific environmental parameters, our framework reliably captures HQ dynamics even in human-dominated landscapes (e.g., urban/agricultural areas), offering realistic decision-making and data support for ecological conservation in fragile arid.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"178 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113818\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25007484\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25007484","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Incorporating field sampling to reflect biodiversity protection function in arid region
Biodiversity is integral to achieving multiple Sustainable Development Goals, yet global change threatens its preservation in the Anthropocene. While habitat quality (HQ) has emerged as a widely adopted metric for large-scale biodiversity conservation, accurately quantifying HQ changes across same land use types remains challenging. We developed an enhanced model by integrating a composite environmental index with field data (plant biomass and biodiversity index) into the InVEST-HQ module, enabling robust spatiotemporal HQ assessment in Xinjiang’s dryland ecosystems from 1990 to 2022. The findings showed that our modifications significantly improved model accuracy, with the correlation coefficient (between actual measurement and evaluation values) increasing from 0.1 to 0.58 in forests and 0.3 to 0.76 in grasslands. InVEST-HQ model showed limited sensitivity to HQ changes, and HQ improved by NDVI exhibited habitat type limitations for HQ assessments. The comparative analysis of HQ trends revealed distinct patterns across modeling approaches. While the original InVEST-HQ model showed minimal temporal variation with slight degradation in the study area, a NDVI-modified result exhibited a marked increment in the area. The HQ modified in this study decreased for plains and increased for mountain areas. Our modified method expresses significant improvement in shrubland HQ (13.9%), grassland HQ (5.7%) and urban HQ (13.7%) and marked decline in forest ecosystems (−4.5%). By incorporating region-specific environmental parameters, our framework reliably captures HQ dynamics even in human-dominated landscapes (e.g., urban/agricultural areas), offering realistic decision-making and data support for ecological conservation in fragile arid.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.