对环境有好处,更安全?生态标签的食品安全光环效应

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Kar Ho Lim , Renu Ojha , Rodolfo M. Nayga
{"title":"对环境有好处,更安全?生态标签的食品安全光环效应","authors":"Kar Ho Lim ,&nbsp;Renu Ojha ,&nbsp;Rodolfo M. Nayga","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Eco-labels signal environmentally conscious processes, facilitating a market-based solution to promote sustainability for food production. However, overshadowed by environmental preference, consumers may misperceive the labels as markers of safer food. The halo effect may cause a loss of consumer welfare and inefficient resource allocation. Our study shows that many consumers perceive Marine Stewardship Council and Sustainably Sourced as indicators of safer products. The food safety perception is likely more intense in pro-environment consumers—a sign of a halo effect. The halo effect leads to a higher willingness to pay. For many, perceived food safety quality outweighs environmental attitudes in the preference for the eco-labels. Consumers may be paying for food safety quality that has been misattributed to eco-labels.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 105629"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Good for the environment and safer? Food safety halo effect of eco-labels\",\"authors\":\"Kar Ho Lim ,&nbsp;Renu Ojha ,&nbsp;Rodolfo M. Nayga\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Eco-labels signal environmentally conscious processes, facilitating a market-based solution to promote sustainability for food production. However, overshadowed by environmental preference, consumers may misperceive the labels as markers of safer food. The halo effect may cause a loss of consumer welfare and inefficient resource allocation. Our study shows that many consumers perceive Marine Stewardship Council and Sustainably Sourced as indicators of safer products. The food safety perception is likely more intense in pro-environment consumers—a sign of a halo effect. The halo effect leads to a higher willingness to pay. For many, perceived food safety quality outweighs environmental attitudes in the preference for the eco-labels. Consumers may be paying for food safety quality that has been misattributed to eco-labels.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"volume\":\"133 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105629\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325002046\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325002046","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生态标签标志着具有环保意识的过程,促进了以市场为基础的解决方案,以促进粮食生产的可持续性。然而,受环境偏好的影响,消费者可能会将标签误认为是更安全食品的标志。光环效应可能导致消费者福利损失和资源配置效率低下。我们的研究表明,许多消费者认为海洋管理委员会和可持续采购是更安全产品的指标。支持环保的消费者对食品安全的认知可能更为强烈——这是一种光环效应的标志。光环效应导致更高的支付意愿。对许多人来说,在对生态标签的偏好中,感知到的食品安全质量超过了环境态度。消费者可能会为被错误地归因于生态标签的食品安全质量买单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Good for the environment and safer? Food safety halo effect of eco-labels
Eco-labels signal environmentally conscious processes, facilitating a market-based solution to promote sustainability for food production. However, overshadowed by environmental preference, consumers may misperceive the labels as markers of safer food. The halo effect may cause a loss of consumer welfare and inefficient resource allocation. Our study shows that many consumers perceive Marine Stewardship Council and Sustainably Sourced as indicators of safer products. The food safety perception is likely more intense in pro-environment consumers—a sign of a halo effect. The halo effect leads to a higher willingness to pay. For many, perceived food safety quality outweighs environmental attitudes in the preference for the eco-labels. Consumers may be paying for food safety quality that has been misattributed to eco-labels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信