探索农民的感知弹性:佛兰德农业系统的概况

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Isabeau Coopmans , Erwin Wauters , Alisa Spiegel , Thomas Slijper , Erik Mathijs
{"title":"探索农民的感知弹性:佛兰德农业系统的概况","authors":"Isabeau Coopmans ,&nbsp;Erwin Wauters ,&nbsp;Alisa Spiegel ,&nbsp;Thomas Slijper ,&nbsp;Erik Mathijs","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>European farms face social, economic, institutional and environmental challenges that often intermingle and impose cumulative pressures. The capacity of farmers and farms to deal with these challenges is determined by three types of resilience capacities: robustness, adaptability and transformability.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This study empirically investigates perceived resilience capacity levels on Flemish farms. Furthermore, we explore whether differences in these perceived levels of robustness, adaptability, and transformability across farms can be linked to resilience attributes at farm and farmer level.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>Both the perceived resilience capacity levels and the farm and farmer indicators for resilience attributes were operationalized based on resilience theory from the literature. Our conceptual framework distinguished resilience attributes to be relating to either farm characteristics (such as farm size and typology) or farmer characteristics (such as risk behaviour and entrepreneurial profile). The dataset was representative for professional farming in Flanders (the Northern half of Belgium) and created by coupling survey data with data from the Flemish Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN). Analytical methods encompassed factor analysis, cluster analysis, and inference statistics.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>Some farmers seem to make a trade-off between robustness on the one hand and adaptability and transformability on the other hand, while other farmers rate the presence of all three capacities similarly. This suggests that the relation between the three resilience capacities appears more complex than has been previously reported in the literature. Overall, higher perceived robustness was mainly associated with farm attributes such as better economic performance and increased farm size. At the same time, higher perceived adaptability and transformability were associated with farmer characteristics such as willingness to experiment and connectivity with external actors.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>This study enhances the understanding of how perceived farm resilience capacity levels are linked to both farm and farmer resilience attributes. By integrating survey data with FADN data, it offers a novel approach to assessing farm resilience, combining both subjective and objective indicators for resilience attributes at farmer and farm level respectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"229 ","pages":"Article 104429"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring farmers' perceived resilience: A profiling of the Flemish farming system\",\"authors\":\"Isabeau Coopmans ,&nbsp;Erwin Wauters ,&nbsp;Alisa Spiegel ,&nbsp;Thomas Slijper ,&nbsp;Erik Mathijs\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>European farms face social, economic, institutional and environmental challenges that often intermingle and impose cumulative pressures. The capacity of farmers and farms to deal with these challenges is determined by three types of resilience capacities: robustness, adaptability and transformability.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This study empirically investigates perceived resilience capacity levels on Flemish farms. Furthermore, we explore whether differences in these perceived levels of robustness, adaptability, and transformability across farms can be linked to resilience attributes at farm and farmer level.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>Both the perceived resilience capacity levels and the farm and farmer indicators for resilience attributes were operationalized based on resilience theory from the literature. Our conceptual framework distinguished resilience attributes to be relating to either farm characteristics (such as farm size and typology) or farmer characteristics (such as risk behaviour and entrepreneurial profile). The dataset was representative for professional farming in Flanders (the Northern half of Belgium) and created by coupling survey data with data from the Flemish Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN). Analytical methods encompassed factor analysis, cluster analysis, and inference statistics.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>Some farmers seem to make a trade-off between robustness on the one hand and adaptability and transformability on the other hand, while other farmers rate the presence of all three capacities similarly. This suggests that the relation between the three resilience capacities appears more complex than has been previously reported in the literature. Overall, higher perceived robustness was mainly associated with farm attributes such as better economic performance and increased farm size. At the same time, higher perceived adaptability and transformability were associated with farmer characteristics such as willingness to experiment and connectivity with external actors.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>This study enhances the understanding of how perceived farm resilience capacity levels are linked to both farm and farmer resilience attributes. By integrating survey data with FADN data, it offers a novel approach to assessing farm resilience, combining both subjective and objective indicators for resilience attributes at farmer and farm level respectively.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"volume\":\"229 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104429\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X25001696\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X25001696","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲农场面临着社会、经济、制度和环境方面的挑战,这些挑战往往相互交织,并造成累积的压力。农民和农场应对这些挑战的能力取决于三种恢复能力:稳健性、适应性和可变革性。目的对佛兰德农场的感知弹性能力水平进行实证研究。此外,我们探讨了这些感知水平的稳健性、适应性和可转化性在农场之间的差异是否与农场和农民层面的弹性属性有关。方法基于文献中的弹性理论,对弹性感知能力水平和农户弹性属性指标进行操作化。我们的概念框架将弹性属性区分为与农场特征(如农场规模和类型)或农民特征(如风险行为和企业家形象)相关。该数据集代表了佛兰德斯(比利时北半部)的专业农业,并通过将调查数据与佛兰德农场会计数据网络(FADN)的数据相结合而创建。分析方法包括因子分析、聚类分析和推理统计。结果与结论一些农民似乎在稳健性与适应性和可转化性之间做出权衡,而其他农民对这三种能力的评价相似。这表明,三种弹性能力之间的关系似乎比以前文献中报道的更为复杂。总体而言,较高的感知稳健性主要与农场属性相关,如更好的经济表现和农场规模的增加。同时,较高的感知适应性和可转化性与农民特征相关,如实验意愿和与外部行动者的联系。意义:本研究增强了对感知农场弹性能力水平与农场和农民弹性属性之间关系的理解。通过将调查数据与FADN数据相结合,提供了一种评估农场弹性的新方法,将主观和客观指标分别用于农民和农场层面的弹性属性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exploring farmers' perceived resilience: A profiling of the Flemish farming system

Exploring farmers' perceived resilience: A profiling of the Flemish farming system

CONTEXT

European farms face social, economic, institutional and environmental challenges that often intermingle and impose cumulative pressures. The capacity of farmers and farms to deal with these challenges is determined by three types of resilience capacities: robustness, adaptability and transformability.

OBJECTIVE

This study empirically investigates perceived resilience capacity levels on Flemish farms. Furthermore, we explore whether differences in these perceived levels of robustness, adaptability, and transformability across farms can be linked to resilience attributes at farm and farmer level.

METHODS

Both the perceived resilience capacity levels and the farm and farmer indicators for resilience attributes were operationalized based on resilience theory from the literature. Our conceptual framework distinguished resilience attributes to be relating to either farm characteristics (such as farm size and typology) or farmer characteristics (such as risk behaviour and entrepreneurial profile). The dataset was representative for professional farming in Flanders (the Northern half of Belgium) and created by coupling survey data with data from the Flemish Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN). Analytical methods encompassed factor analysis, cluster analysis, and inference statistics.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Some farmers seem to make a trade-off between robustness on the one hand and adaptability and transformability on the other hand, while other farmers rate the presence of all three capacities similarly. This suggests that the relation between the three resilience capacities appears more complex than has been previously reported in the literature. Overall, higher perceived robustness was mainly associated with farm attributes such as better economic performance and increased farm size. At the same time, higher perceived adaptability and transformability were associated with farmer characteristics such as willingness to experiment and connectivity with external actors.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study enhances the understanding of how perceived farm resilience capacity levels are linked to both farm and farmer resilience attributes. By integrating survey data with FADN data, it offers a novel approach to assessing farm resilience, combining both subjective and objective indicators for resilience attributes at farmer and farm level respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信