Isabeau Coopmans , Erwin Wauters , Alisa Spiegel , Thomas Slijper , Erik Mathijs
{"title":"探索农民的感知弹性:佛兰德农业系统的概况","authors":"Isabeau Coopmans , Erwin Wauters , Alisa Spiegel , Thomas Slijper , Erik Mathijs","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>European farms face social, economic, institutional and environmental challenges that often intermingle and impose cumulative pressures. The capacity of farmers and farms to deal with these challenges is determined by three types of resilience capacities: robustness, adaptability and transformability.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This study empirically investigates perceived resilience capacity levels on Flemish farms. Furthermore, we explore whether differences in these perceived levels of robustness, adaptability, and transformability across farms can be linked to resilience attributes at farm and farmer level.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>Both the perceived resilience capacity levels and the farm and farmer indicators for resilience attributes were operationalized based on resilience theory from the literature. Our conceptual framework distinguished resilience attributes to be relating to either farm characteristics (such as farm size and typology) or farmer characteristics (such as risk behaviour and entrepreneurial profile). The dataset was representative for professional farming in Flanders (the Northern half of Belgium) and created by coupling survey data with data from the Flemish Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN). Analytical methods encompassed factor analysis, cluster analysis, and inference statistics.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>Some farmers seem to make a trade-off between robustness on the one hand and adaptability and transformability on the other hand, while other farmers rate the presence of all three capacities similarly. This suggests that the relation between the three resilience capacities appears more complex than has been previously reported in the literature. Overall, higher perceived robustness was mainly associated with farm attributes such as better economic performance and increased farm size. At the same time, higher perceived adaptability and transformability were associated with farmer characteristics such as willingness to experiment and connectivity with external actors.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>This study enhances the understanding of how perceived farm resilience capacity levels are linked to both farm and farmer resilience attributes. By integrating survey data with FADN data, it offers a novel approach to assessing farm resilience, combining both subjective and objective indicators for resilience attributes at farmer and farm level respectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"229 ","pages":"Article 104429"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring farmers' perceived resilience: A profiling of the Flemish farming system\",\"authors\":\"Isabeau Coopmans , Erwin Wauters , Alisa Spiegel , Thomas Slijper , Erik Mathijs\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>European farms face social, economic, institutional and environmental challenges that often intermingle and impose cumulative pressures. The capacity of farmers and farms to deal with these challenges is determined by three types of resilience capacities: robustness, adaptability and transformability.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This study empirically investigates perceived resilience capacity levels on Flemish farms. Furthermore, we explore whether differences in these perceived levels of robustness, adaptability, and transformability across farms can be linked to resilience attributes at farm and farmer level.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>Both the perceived resilience capacity levels and the farm and farmer indicators for resilience attributes were operationalized based on resilience theory from the literature. Our conceptual framework distinguished resilience attributes to be relating to either farm characteristics (such as farm size and typology) or farmer characteristics (such as risk behaviour and entrepreneurial profile). The dataset was representative for professional farming in Flanders (the Northern half of Belgium) and created by coupling survey data with data from the Flemish Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN). Analytical methods encompassed factor analysis, cluster analysis, and inference statistics.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>Some farmers seem to make a trade-off between robustness on the one hand and adaptability and transformability on the other hand, while other farmers rate the presence of all three capacities similarly. This suggests that the relation between the three resilience capacities appears more complex than has been previously reported in the literature. Overall, higher perceived robustness was mainly associated with farm attributes such as better economic performance and increased farm size. At the same time, higher perceived adaptability and transformability were associated with farmer characteristics such as willingness to experiment and connectivity with external actors.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>This study enhances the understanding of how perceived farm resilience capacity levels are linked to both farm and farmer resilience attributes. By integrating survey data with FADN data, it offers a novel approach to assessing farm resilience, combining both subjective and objective indicators for resilience attributes at farmer and farm level respectively.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"volume\":\"229 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104429\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X25001696\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X25001696","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring farmers' perceived resilience: A profiling of the Flemish farming system
CONTEXT
European farms face social, economic, institutional and environmental challenges that often intermingle and impose cumulative pressures. The capacity of farmers and farms to deal with these challenges is determined by three types of resilience capacities: robustness, adaptability and transformability.
OBJECTIVE
This study empirically investigates perceived resilience capacity levels on Flemish farms. Furthermore, we explore whether differences in these perceived levels of robustness, adaptability, and transformability across farms can be linked to resilience attributes at farm and farmer level.
METHODS
Both the perceived resilience capacity levels and the farm and farmer indicators for resilience attributes were operationalized based on resilience theory from the literature. Our conceptual framework distinguished resilience attributes to be relating to either farm characteristics (such as farm size and typology) or farmer characteristics (such as risk behaviour and entrepreneurial profile). The dataset was representative for professional farming in Flanders (the Northern half of Belgium) and created by coupling survey data with data from the Flemish Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN). Analytical methods encompassed factor analysis, cluster analysis, and inference statistics.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
Some farmers seem to make a trade-off between robustness on the one hand and adaptability and transformability on the other hand, while other farmers rate the presence of all three capacities similarly. This suggests that the relation between the three resilience capacities appears more complex than has been previously reported in the literature. Overall, higher perceived robustness was mainly associated with farm attributes such as better economic performance and increased farm size. At the same time, higher perceived adaptability and transformability were associated with farmer characteristics such as willingness to experiment and connectivity with external actors.
SIGNIFICANCE
This study enhances the understanding of how perceived farm resilience capacity levels are linked to both farm and farmer resilience attributes. By integrating survey data with FADN data, it offers a novel approach to assessing farm resilience, combining both subjective and objective indicators for resilience attributes at farmer and farm level respectively.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments.
The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas:
Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making;
The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment;
Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems;
Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.