改进了球磨均质法制备样品的方法

IF 6.5 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Madison E. Walbrun , Aamna Aijaz , Gabriella Ryan , John D. Bunting , Zachary P. Morehouse , Rodney J. Nash
{"title":"改进了球磨均质法制备样品的方法","authors":"Madison E. Walbrun ,&nbsp;Aamna Aijaz ,&nbsp;Gabriella Ryan ,&nbsp;John D. Bunting ,&nbsp;Zachary P. Morehouse ,&nbsp;Rodney J. Nash","doi":"10.1016/j.sampre.2025.100194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Proper sample preparation is the key to having successful data analysis downstream. Despite the many efforts to improve sample preparation, there are still many inconsistencies and challenges when attempting to produce a sample for downstream analysis. Here we compare common methods used in sample preparation (detergent and manual Dounce homogenization) to mechanical Bead Mill homogenization. These methods have been shown to lyse both cell and tissue, however, concentrations and detectability of desired analytes can be greatly reduced. These results show that mechanical Bead Mill homogenization requires less starting sample, and less time, while producing higher protein concentrations with increased reproducibility, therefore improving downstream analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100052,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Sample Preparation","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100194"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved sample preparation using bead mill homogenization\",\"authors\":\"Madison E. Walbrun ,&nbsp;Aamna Aijaz ,&nbsp;Gabriella Ryan ,&nbsp;John D. Bunting ,&nbsp;Zachary P. Morehouse ,&nbsp;Rodney J. Nash\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sampre.2025.100194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Proper sample preparation is the key to having successful data analysis downstream. Despite the many efforts to improve sample preparation, there are still many inconsistencies and challenges when attempting to produce a sample for downstream analysis. Here we compare common methods used in sample preparation (detergent and manual Dounce homogenization) to mechanical Bead Mill homogenization. These methods have been shown to lyse both cell and tissue, however, concentrations and detectability of desired analytes can be greatly reduced. These results show that mechanical Bead Mill homogenization requires less starting sample, and less time, while producing higher protein concentrations with increased reproducibility, therefore improving downstream analysis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Sample Preparation\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Sample Preparation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772582025000476\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Sample Preparation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772582025000476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

正确的样品制备是下游数据分析成功的关键。尽管在改进样品制备方面做出了许多努力,但在试图生产用于下游分析的样品时,仍然存在许多不一致和挑战。在这里,我们比较了样品制备中常用的方法(洗涤剂和手动Dounce均质)和机械珠磨均质。这些方法已被证明可以裂解细胞和组织,然而,所需分析物的浓度和可检测性会大大降低。这些结果表明,机械球磨均质需要更少的起始样品和更少的时间,同时产生更高的蛋白质浓度,增加了再现性,从而改善了下游分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improved sample preparation using bead mill homogenization
Proper sample preparation is the key to having successful data analysis downstream. Despite the many efforts to improve sample preparation, there are still many inconsistencies and challenges when attempting to produce a sample for downstream analysis. Here we compare common methods used in sample preparation (detergent and manual Dounce homogenization) to mechanical Bead Mill homogenization. These methods have been shown to lyse both cell and tissue, however, concentrations and detectability of desired analytes can be greatly reduced. These results show that mechanical Bead Mill homogenization requires less starting sample, and less time, while producing higher protein concentrations with increased reproducibility, therefore improving downstream analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信