Carolina Barbosa, Thomas J Hoerger, Nicole A Mack, Georgiy V Bobashev, Simon Neuwahl, Rainer Hilscher, Trevor Orchard, Tina Costacou, Rachel G Miller, Ralph D'Agostino, Ping Zhang
{"title":"估算1型糖尿病患者干预措施的长期健康和成本结果的新模拟模型","authors":"Carolina Barbosa, Thomas J Hoerger, Nicole A Mack, Georgiy V Bobashev, Simon Neuwahl, Rainer Hilscher, Trevor Orchard, Tina Costacou, Rachel G Miller, Ralph D'Agostino, Ping Zhang","doi":"10.2337/dc25-0124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a U.S.-based microsimulation model for assessing the cost-effectiveness of interventions to manage type 1 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We developed risk equations for 14 diabetes-related complications and mortality, 12 risk factor progression equations, and one equation for utilities associated with 14 complications using data from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) studies and the Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications (EDC) study. We integrated all equations into a simulation model. We conducted internal and external validation and demonstrated the utility of the model using a real-world example. Main model-generated outcomes included cumulative incidence of diabetes-related complications, life years, quality-adjusted life years, medical costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model generates long-term clinical and economic outcomes from changes in risk factors of type 1 diabetes complications. Internal validation comparing modeled outcomes to observed data used to develop the model yielded good prediction accuracy, with mean absolute percentage error across all complications of 9% and correlation of cumulative failure rates above 0.9. External validation results were mixed, with occurrence of slight under- or overprediction across complications and studies. We illustrated the model with a case study estimating the effects of expanding the use of an insulin pump with continuous glucose monitoring to all people with type 1 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our new comprehensive type 1 diabetes simulation model can generate valid and accurate results for assessing the long-term cost-effectiveness of interventions to manage type 1 diabetes in the U.S.</p>","PeriodicalId":93979,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New Simulation Model to Estimate the Long-term Health and Cost Outcomes of Interventions for People With Type 1 Diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Carolina Barbosa, Thomas J Hoerger, Nicole A Mack, Georgiy V Bobashev, Simon Neuwahl, Rainer Hilscher, Trevor Orchard, Tina Costacou, Rachel G Miller, Ralph D'Agostino, Ping Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.2337/dc25-0124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a U.S.-based microsimulation model for assessing the cost-effectiveness of interventions to manage type 1 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We developed risk equations for 14 diabetes-related complications and mortality, 12 risk factor progression equations, and one equation for utilities associated with 14 complications using data from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) studies and the Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications (EDC) study. We integrated all equations into a simulation model. We conducted internal and external validation and demonstrated the utility of the model using a real-world example. Main model-generated outcomes included cumulative incidence of diabetes-related complications, life years, quality-adjusted life years, medical costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model generates long-term clinical and economic outcomes from changes in risk factors of type 1 diabetes complications. Internal validation comparing modeled outcomes to observed data used to develop the model yielded good prediction accuracy, with mean absolute percentage error across all complications of 9% and correlation of cumulative failure rates above 0.9. External validation results were mixed, with occurrence of slight under- or overprediction across complications and studies. We illustrated the model with a case study estimating the effects of expanding the use of an insulin pump with continuous glucose monitoring to all people with type 1 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our new comprehensive type 1 diabetes simulation model can generate valid and accurate results for assessing the long-term cost-effectiveness of interventions to manage type 1 diabetes in the U.S.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc25-0124\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc25-0124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A New Simulation Model to Estimate the Long-term Health and Cost Outcomes of Interventions for People With Type 1 Diabetes.
Objective: To develop a U.S.-based microsimulation model for assessing the cost-effectiveness of interventions to manage type 1 diabetes.
Research design and methods: We developed risk equations for 14 diabetes-related complications and mortality, 12 risk factor progression equations, and one equation for utilities associated with 14 complications using data from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) studies and the Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications (EDC) study. We integrated all equations into a simulation model. We conducted internal and external validation and demonstrated the utility of the model using a real-world example. Main model-generated outcomes included cumulative incidence of diabetes-related complications, life years, quality-adjusted life years, medical costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.
Results: The model generates long-term clinical and economic outcomes from changes in risk factors of type 1 diabetes complications. Internal validation comparing modeled outcomes to observed data used to develop the model yielded good prediction accuracy, with mean absolute percentage error across all complications of 9% and correlation of cumulative failure rates above 0.9. External validation results were mixed, with occurrence of slight under- or overprediction across complications and studies. We illustrated the model with a case study estimating the effects of expanding the use of an insulin pump with continuous glucose monitoring to all people with type 1 diabetes.
Conclusions: Our new comprehensive type 1 diabetes simulation model can generate valid and accurate results for assessing the long-term cost-effectiveness of interventions to manage type 1 diabetes in the U.S.