Jessica P Lougheed, Justin Chanut, Alyssa K Truong
{"title":"日常生活压力源报告中情绪与内化症状的关系","authors":"Jessica P Lougheed, Justin Chanut, Alyssa K Truong","doi":"10.1007/s42761-025-00306-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stressor reactivity, the association between the experience of stressors and same-day changes in affect (Almeida et al., 2023), has been examined extensively. Much less research has examined the complementary process: the extent to which affect may influence the perception of stressors. We examined whether affect in daily life was related to the likelihood that individuals report stressors, and whether internalizing symptoms (depressive and anxious symptoms) were associated with these links. Participants (<i>N</i> = 609) were recruited from an undergraduate participant pool and reported daily on their positive and negative affect, and the types of stressors they experienced, in a 14-day daily diary design. We used multilevel survival analysis (MSA) to estimate the likelihood of reporting recurring stressors from mean levels of positive and negative affect, the previous day's positive and negative affect, internalizing symptoms (depressive and anxious symptoms), and interactions between previous day's affect and internalizing symptoms. Previous day's affect was not associated with the risk of reporting stressors. Greater negative affect at the between-person level was associated with a greater risk of all types of stressors we examined, whereas lower between-person positive affect was only associated with the risk of reporting work/school and any stressors. Depressive and anxious symptoms were related in different ways to the likelihood of reporting stressors. This study demonstrates the utility of daily diary methods in combination with MSA to examine directional associations from affect to stressors and their temporal links.</p>","PeriodicalId":72119,"journal":{"name":"Affective science","volume":"6 2","pages":"285-295"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12209166/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Associations between Affect and Internalizing Symptoms in the Reporting of Stressors in Daily Life.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica P Lougheed, Justin Chanut, Alyssa K Truong\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42761-025-00306-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Stressor reactivity, the association between the experience of stressors and same-day changes in affect (Almeida et al., 2023), has been examined extensively. Much less research has examined the complementary process: the extent to which affect may influence the perception of stressors. We examined whether affect in daily life was related to the likelihood that individuals report stressors, and whether internalizing symptoms (depressive and anxious symptoms) were associated with these links. Participants (<i>N</i> = 609) were recruited from an undergraduate participant pool and reported daily on their positive and negative affect, and the types of stressors they experienced, in a 14-day daily diary design. We used multilevel survival analysis (MSA) to estimate the likelihood of reporting recurring stressors from mean levels of positive and negative affect, the previous day's positive and negative affect, internalizing symptoms (depressive and anxious symptoms), and interactions between previous day's affect and internalizing symptoms. Previous day's affect was not associated with the risk of reporting stressors. Greater negative affect at the between-person level was associated with a greater risk of all types of stressors we examined, whereas lower between-person positive affect was only associated with the risk of reporting work/school and any stressors. Depressive and anxious symptoms were related in different ways to the likelihood of reporting stressors. This study demonstrates the utility of daily diary methods in combination with MSA to examine directional associations from affect to stressors and their temporal links.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Affective science\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"285-295\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12209166/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Affective science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-025-00306-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Affective science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-025-00306-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
压力源反应性,即压力源体验与当日情绪变化之间的关联(Almeida et al., 2023),已被广泛研究。很少有研究考察了互补过程:影响可能影响对压力源感知的程度。我们研究了日常生活中的影响是否与个体报告压力源的可能性有关,以及内化症状(抑郁和焦虑症状)是否与这些联系有关。参与者(N = 609)从一个大学生参与者池中招募,并在14天的日常日记设计中每天报告他们的积极和消极影响,以及他们所经历的压力源类型。我们使用多水平生存分析(MSA)从积极和消极影响的平均水平、前一天的积极和消极影响、内化症状(抑郁和焦虑症状)以及前一天的影响和内化症状之间的相互作用来估计报告反复出现压力源的可能性。前一天的影响与报告压力源的风险无关。在人际层面上,更大的负面影响与我们所检查的所有类型的压力源的风险都有关,而更低的人际积极影响只与报告工作/学校和任何压力源的风险有关。抑郁和焦虑症状以不同的方式与报告压力源的可能性相关。本研究展示了日常日记方法与MSA结合的效用,以检查从情感到压力源的定向关联及其时间联系。
The Associations between Affect and Internalizing Symptoms in the Reporting of Stressors in Daily Life.
Stressor reactivity, the association between the experience of stressors and same-day changes in affect (Almeida et al., 2023), has been examined extensively. Much less research has examined the complementary process: the extent to which affect may influence the perception of stressors. We examined whether affect in daily life was related to the likelihood that individuals report stressors, and whether internalizing symptoms (depressive and anxious symptoms) were associated with these links. Participants (N = 609) were recruited from an undergraduate participant pool and reported daily on their positive and negative affect, and the types of stressors they experienced, in a 14-day daily diary design. We used multilevel survival analysis (MSA) to estimate the likelihood of reporting recurring stressors from mean levels of positive and negative affect, the previous day's positive and negative affect, internalizing symptoms (depressive and anxious symptoms), and interactions between previous day's affect and internalizing symptoms. Previous day's affect was not associated with the risk of reporting stressors. Greater negative affect at the between-person level was associated with a greater risk of all types of stressors we examined, whereas lower between-person positive affect was only associated with the risk of reporting work/school and any stressors. Depressive and anxious symptoms were related in different ways to the likelihood of reporting stressors. This study demonstrates the utility of daily diary methods in combination with MSA to examine directional associations from affect to stressors and their temporal links.