利用人工智能进行自然数据收集,测量商用机动车驾驶员高危行为的流行程度。

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ryan J Moran, J Jill Rogers, Richard S Garfein, Linda L Hill
{"title":"利用人工智能进行自然数据收集,测量商用机动车驾驶员高危行为的流行程度。","authors":"Ryan J Moran, J Jill Rogers, Richard S Garfein, Linda L Hill","doi":"10.1080/15389588.2025.2516711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Crashes involving commercial motor vehicles (CMV) result in high rates of injury and fatality, and rates have been increasing, garnering attention as a priority among transportation safety professionals. Major contributors to crash risk and fatalities, such as operator phone use, seatbelt noncompliance, and speeding remain insufficiently understood in terms of their prevalence, hindering the effectiveness of public health outreach and educational initiatives. This study used high-resolution cameras and Artificial Intelligence (AI) processing for naturalistic data collection to measure the prevalence of speeding, seatbelt noncompliance, and handheld phone use among commercial motor vehicle drivers in San Diego County, California. Technologic approaches utilizing AI can greatly expand understanding of the prevalence of these behaviors, allowing for improved opportunities to address this growing problem facing CMV operators, public health, and traffic safety professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using AI technology, radar and infrared cameras mounted on roadside trailers, data were collected continuously over 7-day periods at 16 locations across the county. The prevalence of CMV drivers' cell phone use, seatbelt noncompliance, and speeding was measured. More than 2,600 h of CMV driving data were collected anonymously across rural and urban locations, including on interstate and county roads, near the US/Mexican border, and on a Native American Reservation. Speeding was defined as exceeding posted speed limits of 55 mph on highways with a maximum speed of 65 mph; we examined both 55 mph (the general CMV speed limit in CA) and 65 mph as cutoffs for speeding. All cell phone and seatbelt violations identified by AI were manually reviewed for accuracy. Temporal associations by time of day, day of the week, and season, as well as roadway characteristics, were used to evaluate the propensity for these behaviors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were collected for 160,671 CMVs between April and August 2024. Of these, 17,341 (10.8%) demonstrated at least one risky driving behavior of speeding (65 mph cutoff), cell phone use, or seatbelt noncompliance. The most common risky behavior was speeding, 4.9% (<i>n</i> = 7195), followed by seatbelt noncompliance 4.5% (<i>n</i> = 7,143), and handheld phone use 2.6% (<i>n</i> = 4,241). The prevalence of all three offenses was highest between 6:30 AM and 8:30 AM (rush hour) and on weekends. The prevalence of speeding was 56.4% (<i>n</i> = 90,652) with a cutoff speed limit of 55 mph-the CMV speed limit in California.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Technological approaches can inform public understanding of the prevalence of behaviors that contribute to safety-critical mistakes. Offense prevalence was found highest on the lowest vehicular traffic days and times. These naturalistic data can guide safe driving policy, planning and decision-making as well as evaluate the impact of interventions while adhering to state and local privacy laws.</p>","PeriodicalId":54422,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of high-risk behaviors among commercial motor vehicle drivers measured using artificial intelligence for naturalistic data collection.\",\"authors\":\"Ryan J Moran, J Jill Rogers, Richard S Garfein, Linda L Hill\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15389588.2025.2516711\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Crashes involving commercial motor vehicles (CMV) result in high rates of injury and fatality, and rates have been increasing, garnering attention as a priority among transportation safety professionals. Major contributors to crash risk and fatalities, such as operator phone use, seatbelt noncompliance, and speeding remain insufficiently understood in terms of their prevalence, hindering the effectiveness of public health outreach and educational initiatives. This study used high-resolution cameras and Artificial Intelligence (AI) processing for naturalistic data collection to measure the prevalence of speeding, seatbelt noncompliance, and handheld phone use among commercial motor vehicle drivers in San Diego County, California. Technologic approaches utilizing AI can greatly expand understanding of the prevalence of these behaviors, allowing for improved opportunities to address this growing problem facing CMV operators, public health, and traffic safety professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using AI technology, radar and infrared cameras mounted on roadside trailers, data were collected continuously over 7-day periods at 16 locations across the county. The prevalence of CMV drivers' cell phone use, seatbelt noncompliance, and speeding was measured. More than 2,600 h of CMV driving data were collected anonymously across rural and urban locations, including on interstate and county roads, near the US/Mexican border, and on a Native American Reservation. Speeding was defined as exceeding posted speed limits of 55 mph on highways with a maximum speed of 65 mph; we examined both 55 mph (the general CMV speed limit in CA) and 65 mph as cutoffs for speeding. All cell phone and seatbelt violations identified by AI were manually reviewed for accuracy. Temporal associations by time of day, day of the week, and season, as well as roadway characteristics, were used to evaluate the propensity for these behaviors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were collected for 160,671 CMVs between April and August 2024. Of these, 17,341 (10.8%) demonstrated at least one risky driving behavior of speeding (65 mph cutoff), cell phone use, or seatbelt noncompliance. The most common risky behavior was speeding, 4.9% (<i>n</i> = 7195), followed by seatbelt noncompliance 4.5% (<i>n</i> = 7,143), and handheld phone use 2.6% (<i>n</i> = 4,241). The prevalence of all three offenses was highest between 6:30 AM and 8:30 AM (rush hour) and on weekends. The prevalence of speeding was 56.4% (<i>n</i> = 90,652) with a cutoff speed limit of 55 mph-the CMV speed limit in California.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Technological approaches can inform public understanding of the prevalence of behaviors that contribute to safety-critical mistakes. Offense prevalence was found highest on the lowest vehicular traffic days and times. These naturalistic data can guide safe driving policy, planning and decision-making as well as evaluate the impact of interventions while adhering to state and local privacy laws.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Traffic Injury Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Traffic Injury Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2516711\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2516711","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:涉及商用机动车辆(CMV)的碰撞导致高伤害率和死亡率,并且比率一直在增加,作为运输安全专业人员的优先事项引起了人们的关注。造成事故风险和死亡的主要因素,如接线员使用电话、不遵守安全带和超速,在其流行程度方面仍未得到充分了解,从而阻碍了公共卫生宣传和教育举措的有效性。本研究使用高分辨率相机和人工智能(AI)处理来收集自然数据,以测量加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥县商用机动车驾驶员中超速、不系安全带和使用手持电话的普遍程度。利用人工智能的技术方法可以极大地扩展对这些行为流行程度的理解,从而为CMV运营商、公共卫生和交通安全专业人员解决这一日益严重的问题提供了更好的机会。方法:利用人工智能技术、安装在路边拖车上的雷达和红外摄像机,在全县16个地点连续收集数据,为期7天。测量了CMV司机使用手机、不系安全带和超速的患病率。超过2600小时的CMV驾驶数据是在农村和城市地区匿名收集的,包括州际公路和县道,美国/墨西哥边境附近,以及美国原住民保留区。超速被定义为在高速公路上超过55英里/小时的限速,最高时速为65英里/小时;我们检查了55英里/小时(加州通用CMV速度限制)和65英里/小时作为超速的临界值。人工智能识别出的所有手机和安全带违规行为都经过了人工审查,以确保准确性。通过一天中的时间、一周中的一天、季节以及道路特征来评估这些行为的倾向。结果:在2024年4月至8月期间收集了160,671例cmv的数据。其中,17341人(10.8%)表现出至少一种危险驾驶行为,包括超速(限速65英里/小时)、使用手机或不系安全带。最常见的危险行为是超速,占4.9% (n = 7195),其次是不系安全带4.5% (n = 7143),使用手机2.6% (n = 4241)。在早上6:30到8:30(高峰时间)和周末,这三种违法行为的发生率最高。超速发生率为56.4% (n = 90,652),限速为55英里/小时(加州CMV限速)。结论:技术方法可以让公众了解导致安全关键错误的行为的普遍性。违章率在车辆最少的天数和次数最高。这些自然数据可以指导安全驾驶政策、规划和决策,并在遵守州和地方隐私法的同时评估干预措施的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence of high-risk behaviors among commercial motor vehicle drivers measured using artificial intelligence for naturalistic data collection.

Objective: Crashes involving commercial motor vehicles (CMV) result in high rates of injury and fatality, and rates have been increasing, garnering attention as a priority among transportation safety professionals. Major contributors to crash risk and fatalities, such as operator phone use, seatbelt noncompliance, and speeding remain insufficiently understood in terms of their prevalence, hindering the effectiveness of public health outreach and educational initiatives. This study used high-resolution cameras and Artificial Intelligence (AI) processing for naturalistic data collection to measure the prevalence of speeding, seatbelt noncompliance, and handheld phone use among commercial motor vehicle drivers in San Diego County, California. Technologic approaches utilizing AI can greatly expand understanding of the prevalence of these behaviors, allowing for improved opportunities to address this growing problem facing CMV operators, public health, and traffic safety professionals.

Methods: Using AI technology, radar and infrared cameras mounted on roadside trailers, data were collected continuously over 7-day periods at 16 locations across the county. The prevalence of CMV drivers' cell phone use, seatbelt noncompliance, and speeding was measured. More than 2,600 h of CMV driving data were collected anonymously across rural and urban locations, including on interstate and county roads, near the US/Mexican border, and on a Native American Reservation. Speeding was defined as exceeding posted speed limits of 55 mph on highways with a maximum speed of 65 mph; we examined both 55 mph (the general CMV speed limit in CA) and 65 mph as cutoffs for speeding. All cell phone and seatbelt violations identified by AI were manually reviewed for accuracy. Temporal associations by time of day, day of the week, and season, as well as roadway characteristics, were used to evaluate the propensity for these behaviors.

Results: Data were collected for 160,671 CMVs between April and August 2024. Of these, 17,341 (10.8%) demonstrated at least one risky driving behavior of speeding (65 mph cutoff), cell phone use, or seatbelt noncompliance. The most common risky behavior was speeding, 4.9% (n = 7195), followed by seatbelt noncompliance 4.5% (n = 7,143), and handheld phone use 2.6% (n = 4,241). The prevalence of all three offenses was highest between 6:30 AM and 8:30 AM (rush hour) and on weekends. The prevalence of speeding was 56.4% (n = 90,652) with a cutoff speed limit of 55 mph-the CMV speed limit in California.

Conclusions: Technological approaches can inform public understanding of the prevalence of behaviors that contribute to safety-critical mistakes. Offense prevalence was found highest on the lowest vehicular traffic days and times. These naturalistic data can guide safe driving policy, planning and decision-making as well as evaluate the impact of interventions while adhering to state and local privacy laws.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Traffic Injury Prevention
Traffic Injury Prevention PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Traffic Injury Prevention is to bridge the disciplines of medicine, engineering, public health and traffic safety in order to foster the science of traffic injury prevention. The archival journal focuses on research, interventions and evaluations within the areas of traffic safety, crash causation, injury prevention and treatment. General topics within the journal''s scope are driver behavior, road infrastructure, emerging crash avoidance technologies, crash and injury epidemiology, alcohol and drugs, impact injury biomechanics, vehicle crashworthiness, occupant restraints, pedestrian safety, evaluation of interventions, economic consequences and emergency and clinical care with specific application to traffic injury prevention. The journal includes full length papers, review articles, case studies, brief technical notes and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信