设计并验证一份问卷,以了解年轻人与分心驾驶有关的信念、意图和行为。

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Johanna M Schmickler, Sheila G Klauer, Stuart F Quan, Matthew D Weaver, Laura K Barger, Charles A Czeisler, Thamina Noorzai, Donald L Fisher, Rebecca Robbins
{"title":"设计并验证一份问卷,以了解年轻人与分心驾驶有关的信念、意图和行为。","authors":"Johanna M Schmickler, Sheila G Klauer, Stuart F Quan, Matthew D Weaver, Laura K Barger, Charles A Czeisler, Thamina Noorzai, Donald L Fisher, Rebecca Robbins","doi":"10.1080/15389588.2025.2493301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Distracted driving, particularly any activity requiring long glances toward a phone while driving, is common among young drivers and represents a significant road safety concern. This study used a theory-informed approach to design a questionnaire examining beliefs, intentions, and behaviors relating to distracted driving in young people. <b>Methods:</b> Semi-structured interviews with 20 high school students were conducted using the Integrative Model of Behavioral Prediction (IMBP) framework to explore attitudes, social norms, and perceived behavioral control. The beliefs identified were incorporated into a 38-item closed-ended questionnaire. The questionnaire was then administered to a geographically representative sample of US high school students with a driver's license. Statistical analyses included correlation analysis and linear regression to evaluate interrelationships among questionnaire items and their associations with established distracted driving measures. <b>Results:</b> Among the geographically representative survey sample (<i>N</i> = 1,126), 50.5% were 18 years of age and 50.9% were female. Participants reported spending an average of 21.1% (<i>SD</i> = 24.6%) of each trip glancing at their phones while driving, and participants estimated that 26.5% (<i>SD</i> = 28.1%) of these glances were two seconds or longer. Reliability analysis showed Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.63 (injunctive norms) to 0.83 (negative outcome expectations). Correlation coefficients between proposed measures and Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) questions ranged from 0.22 to 0.50, indicating weak to moderate relationships. Regression analysis demonstrated significant associations between intentions and beliefs: positive outcome expectations (<i>b</i> = 0.01, <i>p</i> < .01), negative outcome expectations (<i>b</i> = -0.01, <i>p</i> < .001), injunctive norms (<i>b</i> = -0.01, <i>p</i> < .01), descriptive norms (<i>b</i> = 0.03, <i>p</i> < .001), and perceived behavioral control (<i>b</i> = -0.01, <i>p</i> < .01). <b>Conclusion</b>: This study investigated the beliefs and behaviors of young drivers regarding making prolonged glances toward a phone while driving, guided by IMBP theory. Findings suggest that the Distracted Driving Belief Questionnaire (DDBQ) is a valuable tool for understanding this high-risk behavior. The DDBQ may help inform interventions to reduce phone-related distractions and enhance road safety among young drivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":54422,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing and validating a questionnaire to understand beliefs, intentions, and behaviors relating to distracted driving in young people.\",\"authors\":\"Johanna M Schmickler, Sheila G Klauer, Stuart F Quan, Matthew D Weaver, Laura K Barger, Charles A Czeisler, Thamina Noorzai, Donald L Fisher, Rebecca Robbins\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15389588.2025.2493301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Distracted driving, particularly any activity requiring long glances toward a phone while driving, is common among young drivers and represents a significant road safety concern. This study used a theory-informed approach to design a questionnaire examining beliefs, intentions, and behaviors relating to distracted driving in young people. <b>Methods:</b> Semi-structured interviews with 20 high school students were conducted using the Integrative Model of Behavioral Prediction (IMBP) framework to explore attitudes, social norms, and perceived behavioral control. The beliefs identified were incorporated into a 38-item closed-ended questionnaire. The questionnaire was then administered to a geographically representative sample of US high school students with a driver's license. Statistical analyses included correlation analysis and linear regression to evaluate interrelationships among questionnaire items and their associations with established distracted driving measures. <b>Results:</b> Among the geographically representative survey sample (<i>N</i> = 1,126), 50.5% were 18 years of age and 50.9% were female. Participants reported spending an average of 21.1% (<i>SD</i> = 24.6%) of each trip glancing at their phones while driving, and participants estimated that 26.5% (<i>SD</i> = 28.1%) of these glances were two seconds or longer. Reliability analysis showed Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.63 (injunctive norms) to 0.83 (negative outcome expectations). Correlation coefficients between proposed measures and Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) questions ranged from 0.22 to 0.50, indicating weak to moderate relationships. Regression analysis demonstrated significant associations between intentions and beliefs: positive outcome expectations (<i>b</i> = 0.01, <i>p</i> < .01), negative outcome expectations (<i>b</i> = -0.01, <i>p</i> < .001), injunctive norms (<i>b</i> = -0.01, <i>p</i> < .01), descriptive norms (<i>b</i> = 0.03, <i>p</i> < .001), and perceived behavioral control (<i>b</i> = -0.01, <i>p</i> < .01). <b>Conclusion</b>: This study investigated the beliefs and behaviors of young drivers regarding making prolonged glances toward a phone while driving, guided by IMBP theory. Findings suggest that the Distracted Driving Belief Questionnaire (DDBQ) is a valuable tool for understanding this high-risk behavior. The DDBQ may help inform interventions to reduce phone-related distractions and enhance road safety among young drivers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Traffic Injury Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Traffic Injury Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2493301\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2493301","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分心驾驶,尤其是驾驶时需要长时间看手机的行为,在年轻司机中很常见,是一个重大的道路安全问题。本研究采用理论指导的方法设计了一份调查问卷,调查年轻人与分心驾驶有关的信念、意图和行为。方法:采用行为预测综合模型(IMBP)框架对20名高中生进行半结构化访谈,探讨态度、社会规范和感知行为控制的关系。所确定的信念被纳入一份包含38个项目的封闭式问卷。然后,调查问卷被分配给具有地理代表性的美国高中学生,这些学生都有驾照。统计分析包括相关分析和线性回归,以评估问卷项目之间的相互关系及其与既定分心驾驶措施的关联。结果:在具有地理代表性的调查样本(N = 1126)中,18岁年龄组占50.5%,女性占50.9%。参与者报告说,每次开车时平均有21.1% (SD = 24.6%)的时间花在看手机上,参与者估计26.5% (SD = 28.1%)的时间是两秒或更长。信度分析显示Cronbach's alpha在0.63(禁令规范)到0.83(负面结果预期)之间。建议措施与行为风险因素监测系统(BRFSS)问题之间的相关系数在0.22至0.50之间,表明两者之间存在弱至中度关系。回归分析显示意图与信念之间存在显著的相关:积极的结果期望(b = 0.01, p < 0.01)、消极的结果期望(b = -0.01, p < 0.001)、禁令规范(b = -0.01, p < 0.01)、描述性规范(b = 0.03, p < 0.001)和感知行为控制(b = -0.01, p < 0.01)。结论:本研究在IMBP理论的指导下,调查了年轻司机在驾驶过程中长时间看手机的信念和行为。研究结果表明,分心驾驶信念问卷(DDBQ)是了解这种高危行为的一个有价值的工具。DDBQ可能有助于为干预措施提供信息,以减少与手机相关的干扰,并加强年轻司机的道路安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing and validating a questionnaire to understand beliefs, intentions, and behaviors relating to distracted driving in young people.

Objective: Distracted driving, particularly any activity requiring long glances toward a phone while driving, is common among young drivers and represents a significant road safety concern. This study used a theory-informed approach to design a questionnaire examining beliefs, intentions, and behaviors relating to distracted driving in young people. Methods: Semi-structured interviews with 20 high school students were conducted using the Integrative Model of Behavioral Prediction (IMBP) framework to explore attitudes, social norms, and perceived behavioral control. The beliefs identified were incorporated into a 38-item closed-ended questionnaire. The questionnaire was then administered to a geographically representative sample of US high school students with a driver's license. Statistical analyses included correlation analysis and linear regression to evaluate interrelationships among questionnaire items and their associations with established distracted driving measures. Results: Among the geographically representative survey sample (N = 1,126), 50.5% were 18 years of age and 50.9% were female. Participants reported spending an average of 21.1% (SD = 24.6%) of each trip glancing at their phones while driving, and participants estimated that 26.5% (SD = 28.1%) of these glances were two seconds or longer. Reliability analysis showed Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.63 (injunctive norms) to 0.83 (negative outcome expectations). Correlation coefficients between proposed measures and Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) questions ranged from 0.22 to 0.50, indicating weak to moderate relationships. Regression analysis demonstrated significant associations between intentions and beliefs: positive outcome expectations (b = 0.01, p < .01), negative outcome expectations (b = -0.01, p < .001), injunctive norms (b = -0.01, p < .01), descriptive norms (b = 0.03, p < .001), and perceived behavioral control (b = -0.01, p < .01). Conclusion: This study investigated the beliefs and behaviors of young drivers regarding making prolonged glances toward a phone while driving, guided by IMBP theory. Findings suggest that the Distracted Driving Belief Questionnaire (DDBQ) is a valuable tool for understanding this high-risk behavior. The DDBQ may help inform interventions to reduce phone-related distractions and enhance road safety among young drivers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Traffic Injury Prevention
Traffic Injury Prevention PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Traffic Injury Prevention is to bridge the disciplines of medicine, engineering, public health and traffic safety in order to foster the science of traffic injury prevention. The archival journal focuses on research, interventions and evaluations within the areas of traffic safety, crash causation, injury prevention and treatment. General topics within the journal''s scope are driver behavior, road infrastructure, emerging crash avoidance technologies, crash and injury epidemiology, alcohol and drugs, impact injury biomechanics, vehicle crashworthiness, occupant restraints, pedestrian safety, evaluation of interventions, economic consequences and emergency and clinical care with specific application to traffic injury prevention. The journal includes full length papers, review articles, case studies, brief technical notes and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信