澳大利亚人对全科数据共享的了解:焦点小组研究和横断面调查的结果。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Annette J Braunack-Mayer, Alberto Nettel Aguirre, Belinda Fabrianesi, Lucy Carolan, Justin Beilby, Carolyn Adams, Felicity Flack
{"title":"澳大利亚人对全科数据共享的了解:焦点小组研究和横断面调查的结果。","authors":"Annette J Braunack-Mayer, Alberto Nettel Aguirre, Belinda Fabrianesi, Lucy Carolan, Justin Beilby, Carolyn Adams, Felicity Flack","doi":"10.31128/AJGP-04-24-7242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Relatively little is known about public understanding of the secondary use of general practice data. We investigated what the Australian public knows about the secondary use of information in their general practice records.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The investigation used a mixed methods approach with four focus groups (n=22) and a cross-sectional survey that was weighted to be nationally representative (n=2604).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants broadly understood what was in their general practice record. Most believed it was shared with hospital health professionals and other medical staff to support their care. Fewer than 30% thought their health information was shared with health administrators, planners and researchers, and fewer than half believed it was used for planning, to improve health services generally or for research.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The secondary use of general practice data outside the clinical encounter is poorly understood by the public. More and better information about how, where and with whom general practice data are shared is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54241,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of General Practice","volume":"54 7","pages":"471-476"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Australians' knowledge of general practice data sharing: Findings from a focus group study and cross-sectional survey.\",\"authors\":\"Annette J Braunack-Mayer, Alberto Nettel Aguirre, Belinda Fabrianesi, Lucy Carolan, Justin Beilby, Carolyn Adams, Felicity Flack\",\"doi\":\"10.31128/AJGP-04-24-7242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Relatively little is known about public understanding of the secondary use of general practice data. We investigated what the Australian public knows about the secondary use of information in their general practice records.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The investigation used a mixed methods approach with four focus groups (n=22) and a cross-sectional survey that was weighted to be nationally representative (n=2604).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants broadly understood what was in their general practice record. Most believed it was shared with hospital health professionals and other medical staff to support their care. Fewer than 30% thought their health information was shared with health administrators, planners and researchers, and fewer than half believed it was used for planning, to improve health services generally or for research.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The secondary use of general practice data outside the clinical encounter is poorly understood by the public. More and better information about how, where and with whom general practice data are shared is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":\"54 7\",\"pages\":\"471-476\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-04-24-7242\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-04-24-7242","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:公众对全科数据二次使用的了解相对较少。我们调查了澳大利亚公众对普通医疗记录中信息的二次使用的了解情况。方法:调查采用混合方法,包括四个焦点小组(n=22)和一个加权的具有全国代表性的横断面调查(n=2604)。结果:参与者大致理解他们的全科实践记录。大多数人认为,这是与医院卫生专业人员和其他医务人员分享的,以支持他们的护理。不到30%的人认为他们的健康信息与卫生管理人员、规划人员和研究人员共享,不到一半的人认为这些信息用于规划、改善一般卫生服务或用于研究。讨论:公众对临床之外的全科数据的二次使用知之甚少。需要更多和更好的信息,说明如何、在何处以及与谁共享一般实践数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Australians' knowledge of general practice data sharing: Findings from a focus group study and cross-sectional survey.

Background and objectives: Relatively little is known about public understanding of the secondary use of general practice data. We investigated what the Australian public knows about the secondary use of information in their general practice records.

Method: The investigation used a mixed methods approach with four focus groups (n=22) and a cross-sectional survey that was weighted to be nationally representative (n=2604).

Results: Participants broadly understood what was in their general practice record. Most believed it was shared with hospital health professionals and other medical staff to support their care. Fewer than 30% thought their health information was shared with health administrators, planners and researchers, and fewer than half believed it was used for planning, to improve health services generally or for research.

Discussion: The secondary use of general practice data outside the clinical encounter is poorly understood by the public. More and better information about how, where and with whom general practice data are shared is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journal of General Practice
Australian Journal of General Practice Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
284
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of General Practice (AJGP) aims to provide relevant, evidence-based, clearly articulated information to Australian general practitioners (GPs) to assist them in providing the highest quality patient care, applicable to the varied geographic and social contexts in which GPs work and to all GP roles as clinician, researcher, educator, practice team member and opinion leader. All articles are subject to peer review before they are accepted for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信