{"title":"澳大利亚人对全科数据共享的了解:焦点小组研究和横断面调查的结果。","authors":"Annette J Braunack-Mayer, Alberto Nettel Aguirre, Belinda Fabrianesi, Lucy Carolan, Justin Beilby, Carolyn Adams, Felicity Flack","doi":"10.31128/AJGP-04-24-7242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Relatively little is known about public understanding of the secondary use of general practice data. We investigated what the Australian public knows about the secondary use of information in their general practice records.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The investigation used a mixed methods approach with four focus groups (n=22) and a cross-sectional survey that was weighted to be nationally representative (n=2604).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants broadly understood what was in their general practice record. Most believed it was shared with hospital health professionals and other medical staff to support their care. Fewer than 30% thought their health information was shared with health administrators, planners and researchers, and fewer than half believed it was used for planning, to improve health services generally or for research.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The secondary use of general practice data outside the clinical encounter is poorly understood by the public. More and better information about how, where and with whom general practice data are shared is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54241,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of General Practice","volume":"54 7","pages":"471-476"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Australians' knowledge of general practice data sharing: Findings from a focus group study and cross-sectional survey.\",\"authors\":\"Annette J Braunack-Mayer, Alberto Nettel Aguirre, Belinda Fabrianesi, Lucy Carolan, Justin Beilby, Carolyn Adams, Felicity Flack\",\"doi\":\"10.31128/AJGP-04-24-7242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Relatively little is known about public understanding of the secondary use of general practice data. We investigated what the Australian public knows about the secondary use of information in their general practice records.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The investigation used a mixed methods approach with four focus groups (n=22) and a cross-sectional survey that was weighted to be nationally representative (n=2604).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants broadly understood what was in their general practice record. Most believed it was shared with hospital health professionals and other medical staff to support their care. Fewer than 30% thought their health information was shared with health administrators, planners and researchers, and fewer than half believed it was used for planning, to improve health services generally or for research.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The secondary use of general practice data outside the clinical encounter is poorly understood by the public. More and better information about how, where and with whom general practice data are shared is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":\"54 7\",\"pages\":\"471-476\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-04-24-7242\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-04-24-7242","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Australians' knowledge of general practice data sharing: Findings from a focus group study and cross-sectional survey.
Background and objectives: Relatively little is known about public understanding of the secondary use of general practice data. We investigated what the Australian public knows about the secondary use of information in their general practice records.
Method: The investigation used a mixed methods approach with four focus groups (n=22) and a cross-sectional survey that was weighted to be nationally representative (n=2604).
Results: Participants broadly understood what was in their general practice record. Most believed it was shared with hospital health professionals and other medical staff to support their care. Fewer than 30% thought their health information was shared with health administrators, planners and researchers, and fewer than half believed it was used for planning, to improve health services generally or for research.
Discussion: The secondary use of general practice data outside the clinical encounter is poorly understood by the public. More and better information about how, where and with whom general practice data are shared is needed.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Journal of General Practice (AJGP) aims to provide relevant, evidence-based, clearly articulated information to Australian general practitioners (GPs) to assist them in providing the highest quality patient care, applicable to the varied geographic and social contexts in which GPs work and to all GP roles as clinician, researcher, educator, practice team member and opinion leader. All articles are subject to peer review before they are accepted for publication.