外伤性脑损伤患者双谱指数与格拉斯哥昏迷评分的相关性:一项前瞻性观察研究。

Journal of Trauma and Injury Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-30 DOI:10.20408/jti.2025.0026
Anjum H Mujawar, Pradnya M Bhalerao, Sujit J Kshirsagar
{"title":"外伤性脑损伤患者双谱指数与格拉斯哥昏迷评分的相关性:一项前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Anjum H Mujawar, Pradnya M Bhalerao, Sujit J Kshirsagar","doi":"10.20408/jti.2025.0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) severity is typically assessed using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). In contrast, the bispectral index (BIS) objectively evaluates a patient's level of consciousness in an intensive care unit. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between GCS and BIS values in TBI patients. Secondary objectives included determining the range of BIS scores corresponding to different levels of consciousness and assessing the correlation among mild, moderate, and severe TBI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty patients participated in a prospective observational study conducted at a government tertiary care facility. After obtaining a detailed history and performing a physical examination, each patient's age, sex, intubation status, computed tomography brain findings, and vital signs were recorded. Subsequently, the patients' GCS and BIS values were measured at 0, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours. Quantitative data are presented as mean±standard deviation, while qualitative data are illustrated using frequency and percentage tables. Spearman correlation analysis was employed to evaluate the association.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Spearman correlation analysis demonstrated a strong positive relationship between BIS and GCS at 0 hours (r=0.655, P<0.05), 6 hours (r=0.647, P<0.05), 12 hours (r=0.652, P<0.05), 18 hours (r=0.659, P<0.05), and 24 hours (r=0.648, P<0.05). Moreover, the mean BIS value decreased significantly with increasing severity of head injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Similar to the GCS, the BIS correlates with head injury severity and may serve as a complementary tool for predicting outcomes in TBI patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":52698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Injury","volume":"38 2","pages":"97-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12229813/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation between bispectral index values and the Glasgow Coma Scale in traumatic brain injury patients: a prospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Anjum H Mujawar, Pradnya M Bhalerao, Sujit J Kshirsagar\",\"doi\":\"10.20408/jti.2025.0026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) severity is typically assessed using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). In contrast, the bispectral index (BIS) objectively evaluates a patient's level of consciousness in an intensive care unit. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between GCS and BIS values in TBI patients. Secondary objectives included determining the range of BIS scores corresponding to different levels of consciousness and assessing the correlation among mild, moderate, and severe TBI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty patients participated in a prospective observational study conducted at a government tertiary care facility. After obtaining a detailed history and performing a physical examination, each patient's age, sex, intubation status, computed tomography brain findings, and vital signs were recorded. Subsequently, the patients' GCS and BIS values were measured at 0, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours. Quantitative data are presented as mean±standard deviation, while qualitative data are illustrated using frequency and percentage tables. Spearman correlation analysis was employed to evaluate the association.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Spearman correlation analysis demonstrated a strong positive relationship between BIS and GCS at 0 hours (r=0.655, P<0.05), 6 hours (r=0.647, P<0.05), 12 hours (r=0.652, P<0.05), 18 hours (r=0.659, P<0.05), and 24 hours (r=0.648, P<0.05). Moreover, the mean BIS value decreased significantly with increasing severity of head injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Similar to the GCS, the BIS correlates with head injury severity and may serve as a complementary tool for predicting outcomes in TBI patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Trauma and Injury\",\"volume\":\"38 2\",\"pages\":\"97-102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12229813/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Trauma and Injury\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20408/jti.2025.0026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma and Injury","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20408/jti.2025.0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的严重程度通常使用格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)进行评估。相比之下,双谱指数(BIS)客观地评估病人的意识水平在重症监护病房。本研究的主要目的是评估TBI患者GCS和BIS值之间的相关性。次要目标包括确定不同意识水平对应的BIS评分范围,并评估轻度、中度和重度TBI之间的相关性。方法:60名患者参加了一项在政府三级医疗机构进行的前瞻性观察研究。在获得详细的病史并进行体格检查后,记录每位患者的年龄、性别、插管状态、计算机断层扫描脑结果和生命体征。随后,分别于0、6、12、18、24小时测量患者GCS和BIS值。定量数据用平均值±标准差表示,定性数据用频率和百分比表表示。采用Spearman相关分析评价相关性。结果:Spearman相关分析显示,BIS与GCS在0小时呈显著正相关(r=0.655, p)。结论:与GCS相似,BIS与颅脑损伤严重程度相关,可作为预测TBI患者预后的补充工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Correlation between bispectral index values and the Glasgow Coma Scale in traumatic brain injury patients: a prospective observational study.

Purpose: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) severity is typically assessed using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). In contrast, the bispectral index (BIS) objectively evaluates a patient's level of consciousness in an intensive care unit. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between GCS and BIS values in TBI patients. Secondary objectives included determining the range of BIS scores corresponding to different levels of consciousness and assessing the correlation among mild, moderate, and severe TBI.

Methods: Sixty patients participated in a prospective observational study conducted at a government tertiary care facility. After obtaining a detailed history and performing a physical examination, each patient's age, sex, intubation status, computed tomography brain findings, and vital signs were recorded. Subsequently, the patients' GCS and BIS values were measured at 0, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours. Quantitative data are presented as mean±standard deviation, while qualitative data are illustrated using frequency and percentage tables. Spearman correlation analysis was employed to evaluate the association.

Results: Spearman correlation analysis demonstrated a strong positive relationship between BIS and GCS at 0 hours (r=0.655, P<0.05), 6 hours (r=0.647, P<0.05), 12 hours (r=0.652, P<0.05), 18 hours (r=0.659, P<0.05), and 24 hours (r=0.648, P<0.05). Moreover, the mean BIS value decreased significantly with increasing severity of head injury.

Conclusions: Similar to the GCS, the BIS correlates with head injury severity and may serve as a complementary tool for predicting outcomes in TBI patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信