使用分形分析评估根管治疗后根尖周骨形成:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.7 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Imaging Science in Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-10 DOI:10.5624/isd.20240221
Carla Barros de Oliveira, Thaiza Gonçalves Rocha, Andrea Vaz Braga Pintor, Marcela Baraúna Magno, Aline Corrêa Abrahão, Lucianne Cople Maia, Mário José Romañach, Maria Augusta Visconti
{"title":"使用分形分析评估根管治疗后根尖周骨形成:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Carla Barros de Oliveira, Thaiza Gonçalves Rocha, Andrea Vaz Braga Pintor, Marcela Baraúna Magno, Aline Corrêa Abrahão, Lucianne Cople Maia, Mário José Romañach, Maria Augusta Visconti","doi":"10.5624/isd.20240221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to review, evaluate, and synthesize existing evidence on the effectiveness of fractal analysis (FA) in assessing bone formation in periapical lesions following endodontic treatment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Two reviewers systematically searched 6 electronic databases and gray literature. Studies were deemed eligible if they implemented the desired intervention and included a follow-up period of at least 12 months. Methodological quality was assessed using tools from the Joanna Briggs Institute. The meta-analysis calculated the mean difference (MD) in FA measurements of periapical lesion regions before and after endodontic treatment, with subgroup analyses based on bone and treatment type. The GRADE tool was employed to evaluate the certainty of the evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies were included for qualitative synthesis and 8 in the meta-analysis. Overall, the mean fractal dimension (FD) increased following 12 months of endodontic treatment, with an MD of 0.223 (95% CI: 0.100-0.346; <i>P</i><0.001; I<sup>2</sup>=99%). Subgroup analyses revealed significantly increases in mean FD values for lesions in the maxilla (<i>P</i><0.01) and for the treatment subgroup (<i>P</i><0.01). However, the certainty of evidence was classified as very low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The observed increase in mean FD 12 months post-endodontic treatment across all included studies indicates bone formation in the periapical lesion regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51714,"journal":{"name":"Imaging Science in Dentistry","volume":"55 2","pages":"126-138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12210115/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using fractal analysis to assess periapical bone formation after endodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Carla Barros de Oliveira, Thaiza Gonçalves Rocha, Andrea Vaz Braga Pintor, Marcela Baraúna Magno, Aline Corrêa Abrahão, Lucianne Cople Maia, Mário José Romañach, Maria Augusta Visconti\",\"doi\":\"10.5624/isd.20240221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to review, evaluate, and synthesize existing evidence on the effectiveness of fractal analysis (FA) in assessing bone formation in periapical lesions following endodontic treatment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Two reviewers systematically searched 6 electronic databases and gray literature. Studies were deemed eligible if they implemented the desired intervention and included a follow-up period of at least 12 months. Methodological quality was assessed using tools from the Joanna Briggs Institute. The meta-analysis calculated the mean difference (MD) in FA measurements of periapical lesion regions before and after endodontic treatment, with subgroup analyses based on bone and treatment type. The GRADE tool was employed to evaluate the certainty of the evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies were included for qualitative synthesis and 8 in the meta-analysis. Overall, the mean fractal dimension (FD) increased following 12 months of endodontic treatment, with an MD of 0.223 (95% CI: 0.100-0.346; <i>P</i><0.001; I<sup>2</sup>=99%). Subgroup analyses revealed significantly increases in mean FD values for lesions in the maxilla (<i>P</i><0.01) and for the treatment subgroup (<i>P</i><0.01). However, the certainty of evidence was classified as very low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The observed increase in mean FD 12 months post-endodontic treatment across all included studies indicates bone formation in the periapical lesion regions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Imaging Science in Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"55 2\",\"pages\":\"126-138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12210115/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Imaging Science in Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.20240221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging Science in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.20240221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在回顾、评价和综合有关分形分析(FA)评估根管治疗后根尖周病变骨形成的有效性的现有证据。材料与方法:两位审稿人系统检索了6个电子数据库和灰色文献。如果研究实施了预期的干预措施,并包括至少12个月的随访期,就被认为是合格的。使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的工具评估方法质量。meta分析计算根管治疗前后根尖周围病变区域FA测量的平均差异(MD),并根据骨和治疗类型进行亚组分析。GRADE工具用于评估证据的确定性。结果:10项研究纳入定性综合,8项纳入meta分析。总体而言,牙髓治疗12个月后,平均分形维数(FD)增加,MD为0.223 (95% CI: 0.100-0.346;P2 = 99%)。亚组分析显示,上颌骨病变的平均FD值显著增加(ppp)。结论:在所有纳入的研究中,在根管治疗后12个月观察到的平均FD值增加表明在根尖周围病变区域有骨形成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using fractal analysis to assess periapical bone formation after endodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Purpose: This study aimed to review, evaluate, and synthesize existing evidence on the effectiveness of fractal analysis (FA) in assessing bone formation in periapical lesions following endodontic treatment.

Materials and methods: Two reviewers systematically searched 6 electronic databases and gray literature. Studies were deemed eligible if they implemented the desired intervention and included a follow-up period of at least 12 months. Methodological quality was assessed using tools from the Joanna Briggs Institute. The meta-analysis calculated the mean difference (MD) in FA measurements of periapical lesion regions before and after endodontic treatment, with subgroup analyses based on bone and treatment type. The GRADE tool was employed to evaluate the certainty of the evidence.

Results: Ten studies were included for qualitative synthesis and 8 in the meta-analysis. Overall, the mean fractal dimension (FD) increased following 12 months of endodontic treatment, with an MD of 0.223 (95% CI: 0.100-0.346; P<0.001; I2=99%). Subgroup analyses revealed significantly increases in mean FD values for lesions in the maxilla (P<0.01) and for the treatment subgroup (P<0.01). However, the certainty of evidence was classified as very low.

Conclusion: The observed increase in mean FD 12 months post-endodontic treatment across all included studies indicates bone formation in the periapical lesion regions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Imaging Science in Dentistry
Imaging Science in Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信