Jean-Charles Doucet, Manan Harshadray Patel, Kathy A Russell
{"title":"早期继发性牙槽骨移植治疗牙槽裂裂邻近犬疹的疗效评价。","authors":"Jean-Charles Doucet, Manan Harshadray Patel, Kathy A Russell","doi":"10.1177/10556656251356211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveEvaluate cleft adjacent canine eruption in patients who underwent early secondary alveolar bone grafting (ABG).DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingNorth-American cleft center.SubjectsA total of 121 children with nonsyndromic cleft lip and alveolus or cleft lip and palate (unilateral or bilateral).MethodsPatients consecutively treated with early or later secondary ABG during a 10-year period were evaluated. The primary outcome identified the status of cleft adjacent canine eruption through the grafted site. Secondary outcomes included need for regrafting, need for pregraft expansion and status of the cleft lateral incisor. Categorical variables were compared with Pearson's chi-square test and Fisher's exact test, and <i>P</i> < .05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsA total of 152 ABG (125 early and 27 later ABG) were performed in 121 patients. The age at time of ABG differed significantly between the 2 groups with a mean age of 73.5 ± 5.0 months for the early ABG group versus 113.4 ± 32.0 months for the later ABG group (<i>P</i> < .001). None of the patients required pregraft expansion. The cleft diagnosis distribution was similar (<i>P</i> = .686). The overall need for regrafting was 1.3% and did not differ between the groups (1.6% vs 0%; <i>P</i> = .675). The cleft adjacent canine spontaneously erupted in 84.0% for early ABG versus 70.4% for later ABG group. Close to twice as many canines required surgical exposure (9.6% vs 18.5%) or extraction (6.4% vs 11.1%) in the later ABG group, but this difference was not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = .183).<i>Conclusions</i>Early secondary ABG, without pregraft expansion, does not compromise the eruption of the cleft adjacent canine compared to later secondary ABG.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":" ","pages":"10556656251356211"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Cleft Adjacent Canine Eruption in Patients With Alveolar Cleft Treated With Early Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting.\",\"authors\":\"Jean-Charles Doucet, Manan Harshadray Patel, Kathy A Russell\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10556656251356211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveEvaluate cleft adjacent canine eruption in patients who underwent early secondary alveolar bone grafting (ABG).DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingNorth-American cleft center.SubjectsA total of 121 children with nonsyndromic cleft lip and alveolus or cleft lip and palate (unilateral or bilateral).MethodsPatients consecutively treated with early or later secondary ABG during a 10-year period were evaluated. The primary outcome identified the status of cleft adjacent canine eruption through the grafted site. Secondary outcomes included need for regrafting, need for pregraft expansion and status of the cleft lateral incisor. Categorical variables were compared with Pearson's chi-square test and Fisher's exact test, and <i>P</i> < .05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsA total of 152 ABG (125 early and 27 later ABG) were performed in 121 patients. The age at time of ABG differed significantly between the 2 groups with a mean age of 73.5 ± 5.0 months for the early ABG group versus 113.4 ± 32.0 months for the later ABG group (<i>P</i> < .001). None of the patients required pregraft expansion. The cleft diagnosis distribution was similar (<i>P</i> = .686). The overall need for regrafting was 1.3% and did not differ between the groups (1.6% vs 0%; <i>P</i> = .675). The cleft adjacent canine spontaneously erupted in 84.0% for early ABG versus 70.4% for later ABG group. Close to twice as many canines required surgical exposure (9.6% vs 18.5%) or extraction (6.4% vs 11.1%) in the later ABG group, but this difference was not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = .183).<i>Conclusions</i>Early secondary ABG, without pregraft expansion, does not compromise the eruption of the cleft adjacent canine compared to later secondary ABG.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10556656251356211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656251356211\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656251356211","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的评价早期继发性牙槽骨移植术(ABG)对牙裂邻近犬爆发的影响。设计回顾性队列研究。背景北美裂中心。研究对象121例非综合征性唇裂、牙槽性唇裂或唇腭裂患儿(单侧或双侧)。方法对10年内连续接受早期或晚期继发性ABG治疗的患者进行评估。主要的结果是通过移植的位置确定裂邻近犬爆发的状态。次要结果包括需要再植牙,需要植牙前扩张和侧切牙裂的状态。分类变量比较采用Pearson卡方检验和Fisher精确检验,P P = .686)。再移植的总需要量为1.3%,两组间无差异(1.6% vs 0%;p = .675)。早期ABG组有84.0%的裂裂邻近犬自发爆发,而晚期ABG组有70.4%。在晚期ABG组中,需要手术暴露(9.6% vs 18.5%)或拔牙(6.4% vs 11.1%)的犬只数量接近两倍,但这种差异无统计学意义(P = 0.183)。结论早期继发ABG与晚期继发ABG相比,没有移植前扩张,不影响邻裂犬的爆发。
Evaluation of Cleft Adjacent Canine Eruption in Patients With Alveolar Cleft Treated With Early Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting.
ObjectiveEvaluate cleft adjacent canine eruption in patients who underwent early secondary alveolar bone grafting (ABG).DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingNorth-American cleft center.SubjectsA total of 121 children with nonsyndromic cleft lip and alveolus or cleft lip and palate (unilateral or bilateral).MethodsPatients consecutively treated with early or later secondary ABG during a 10-year period were evaluated. The primary outcome identified the status of cleft adjacent canine eruption through the grafted site. Secondary outcomes included need for regrafting, need for pregraft expansion and status of the cleft lateral incisor. Categorical variables were compared with Pearson's chi-square test and Fisher's exact test, and P < .05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsA total of 152 ABG (125 early and 27 later ABG) were performed in 121 patients. The age at time of ABG differed significantly between the 2 groups with a mean age of 73.5 ± 5.0 months for the early ABG group versus 113.4 ± 32.0 months for the later ABG group (P < .001). None of the patients required pregraft expansion. The cleft diagnosis distribution was similar (P = .686). The overall need for regrafting was 1.3% and did not differ between the groups (1.6% vs 0%; P = .675). The cleft adjacent canine spontaneously erupted in 84.0% for early ABG versus 70.4% for later ABG group. Close to twice as many canines required surgical exposure (9.6% vs 18.5%) or extraction (6.4% vs 11.1%) in the later ABG group, but this difference was not statistically significant (P = .183).ConclusionsEarly secondary ABG, without pregraft expansion, does not compromise the eruption of the cleft adjacent canine compared to later secondary ABG.
期刊介绍:
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.