使用功能呼吸成像观察三种单吸入器三联疗法对COPD患者肺沉积的影响

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Dave Singh, Nicolas Roche, Libo Wu, Hosein Sadafi, Jan De Backer, Navid Monshi Tousi, Jonathan Marshall
{"title":"使用功能呼吸成像观察三种单吸入器三联疗法对COPD患者肺沉积的影响","authors":"Dave Singh, Nicolas Roche, Libo Wu, Hosein Sadafi, Jan De Backer, Navid Monshi Tousi, Jonathan Marshall","doi":"10.2147/COPD.S510214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Inhalation is the foundational route for administering pharmacological treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Given the relevance of both large and small airways in COPD, lung distribution deposition characteristics of different inhaler options could influence treatment effects. This study evaluated the total deposition of 3 single-inhaler triple therapies in the large and small airways.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study assessed lung deposition of different inhalers using in silico functional respiratory imaging from 20 patients with COPD. The first part evaluated budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BGF) pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI), beclomethasone dipropionate/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BDP/G/F) pMDI, and fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) dry powder inhaler (DPI) at 30 L/min. The second part assessed BGF pMDI and FF/UMEC/VI DPI at 60 L/min.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 3 inhalers had different in silico total lung and large and small airways deposition profiles at 30 L/min, with BGF pMDI (54.8% to 57.7%) demonstrating a higher deposition profile across each therapeutic component versus BDP/G/F pMDI (38.6% to 40.5%) and FF/UMEC/VI DPI (24.0% to 36.1%), respectively. Similarly, at 60 L/min, the total deposition of all 3 components of BGF pMDI (57.2% to 58.5%) remained higher compared with FF/UMEC/VI DPI (19.8% to 34.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings provide quantitative insights into relative lung deposition distribution profiles and efficiency of delivery for 3 inhaler options. Further research is needed to understand if these deposition patterns could translate into real-world clinical effectiveness differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":48818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"20 ","pages":"2103-2116"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12214429/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Silico Lung Deposition Profiles of Three Single-Inhaler Triple Therapies in Patients with COPD Using Functional Respiratory Imaging.\",\"authors\":\"Dave Singh, Nicolas Roche, Libo Wu, Hosein Sadafi, Jan De Backer, Navid Monshi Tousi, Jonathan Marshall\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/COPD.S510214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Inhalation is the foundational route for administering pharmacological treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Given the relevance of both large and small airways in COPD, lung distribution deposition characteristics of different inhaler options could influence treatment effects. This study evaluated the total deposition of 3 single-inhaler triple therapies in the large and small airways.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study assessed lung deposition of different inhalers using in silico functional respiratory imaging from 20 patients with COPD. The first part evaluated budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BGF) pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI), beclomethasone dipropionate/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BDP/G/F) pMDI, and fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) dry powder inhaler (DPI) at 30 L/min. The second part assessed BGF pMDI and FF/UMEC/VI DPI at 60 L/min.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 3 inhalers had different in silico total lung and large and small airways deposition profiles at 30 L/min, with BGF pMDI (54.8% to 57.7%) demonstrating a higher deposition profile across each therapeutic component versus BDP/G/F pMDI (38.6% to 40.5%) and FF/UMEC/VI DPI (24.0% to 36.1%), respectively. Similarly, at 60 L/min, the total deposition of all 3 components of BGF pMDI (57.2% to 58.5%) remained higher compared with FF/UMEC/VI DPI (19.8% to 34.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings provide quantitative insights into relative lung deposition distribution profiles and efficiency of delivery for 3 inhaler options. Further research is needed to understand if these deposition patterns could translate into real-world clinical effectiveness differences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"2103-2116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12214429/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S510214\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S510214","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:吸入是慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)药物治疗的基本途径。考虑到大气道和小气道在COPD中的相关性,不同吸入器选择的肺分布沉积特征可能会影响治疗效果。本研究评估了3种单吸入器三联疗法在大、小气道中的总沉积。方法:本研究对20例慢性阻塞性肺病患者不同吸入器的肺沉积进行了计算机功能呼吸成像评估。第一部分评价了布地奈德/甘炔溴铵/富马酸福莫特罗二水合(BGF)加压计量吸入器(pMDI)、二丙酸倍氯米松/甘炔溴铵/富马酸福莫特罗二水合(BDP/G/F) pMDI和糠酸氟替卡松/莫克里啶铵/维兰特罗(FF/UMEC/VI)干粉吸入器(DPI),流速为30 L/min。第二部分以60 L/min的速度评估BGF pMDI和FF/UMEC/VI DPI。结果:所有3种吸入器在30 L/min时具有不同的硅全肺和大、小气道沉积谱,BGF pMDI(54.8%至57.7%)比BDP/G/F pMDI(38.6%至40.5%)和FF/UMEC/VI DPI(24.0%至36.1%)在每个治疗成分中显示更高的沉积谱。同样,在60 L/min时,BGF pMDI的3种组分的总沉积量(57.2% ~ 58.5%)仍高于FF/UMEC/VI DPI(19.8% ~ 34.1%)。结论:这些发现为3种吸入器的相对肺沉积分布概况和输送效率提供了定量的见解。需要进一步的研究来了解这些沉积模式是否可以转化为现实世界的临床疗效差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

In Silico Lung Deposition Profiles of Three Single-Inhaler Triple Therapies in Patients with COPD Using Functional Respiratory Imaging.

In Silico Lung Deposition Profiles of Three Single-Inhaler Triple Therapies in Patients with COPD Using Functional Respiratory Imaging.

In Silico Lung Deposition Profiles of Three Single-Inhaler Triple Therapies in Patients with COPD Using Functional Respiratory Imaging.

In Silico Lung Deposition Profiles of Three Single-Inhaler Triple Therapies in Patients with COPD Using Functional Respiratory Imaging.

Introduction: Inhalation is the foundational route for administering pharmacological treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Given the relevance of both large and small airways in COPD, lung distribution deposition characteristics of different inhaler options could influence treatment effects. This study evaluated the total deposition of 3 single-inhaler triple therapies in the large and small airways.

Methods: This study assessed lung deposition of different inhalers using in silico functional respiratory imaging from 20 patients with COPD. The first part evaluated budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BGF) pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI), beclomethasone dipropionate/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BDP/G/F) pMDI, and fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) dry powder inhaler (DPI) at 30 L/min. The second part assessed BGF pMDI and FF/UMEC/VI DPI at 60 L/min.

Results: All 3 inhalers had different in silico total lung and large and small airways deposition profiles at 30 L/min, with BGF pMDI (54.8% to 57.7%) demonstrating a higher deposition profile across each therapeutic component versus BDP/G/F pMDI (38.6% to 40.5%) and FF/UMEC/VI DPI (24.0% to 36.1%), respectively. Similarly, at 60 L/min, the total deposition of all 3 components of BGF pMDI (57.2% to 58.5%) remained higher compared with FF/UMEC/VI DPI (19.8% to 34.1%).

Conclusion: These findings provide quantitative insights into relative lung deposition distribution profiles and efficiency of delivery for 3 inhaler options. Further research is needed to understand if these deposition patterns could translate into real-world clinical effectiveness differences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
372
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies and reviews in COPD. Special focus will be given to the pathophysiological processes underlying the disease, intervention programs, patient focused education, and self management protocols. This journal is directed at specialists and healthcare professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信