Dave Singh, Nicolas Roche, Libo Wu, Hosein Sadafi, Jan De Backer, Navid Monshi Tousi, Jonathan Marshall
{"title":"使用功能呼吸成像观察三种单吸入器三联疗法对COPD患者肺沉积的影响","authors":"Dave Singh, Nicolas Roche, Libo Wu, Hosein Sadafi, Jan De Backer, Navid Monshi Tousi, Jonathan Marshall","doi":"10.2147/COPD.S510214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Inhalation is the foundational route for administering pharmacological treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Given the relevance of both large and small airways in COPD, lung distribution deposition characteristics of different inhaler options could influence treatment effects. This study evaluated the total deposition of 3 single-inhaler triple therapies in the large and small airways.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study assessed lung deposition of different inhalers using in silico functional respiratory imaging from 20 patients with COPD. The first part evaluated budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BGF) pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI), beclomethasone dipropionate/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BDP/G/F) pMDI, and fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) dry powder inhaler (DPI) at 30 L/min. The second part assessed BGF pMDI and FF/UMEC/VI DPI at 60 L/min.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 3 inhalers had different in silico total lung and large and small airways deposition profiles at 30 L/min, with BGF pMDI (54.8% to 57.7%) demonstrating a higher deposition profile across each therapeutic component versus BDP/G/F pMDI (38.6% to 40.5%) and FF/UMEC/VI DPI (24.0% to 36.1%), respectively. Similarly, at 60 L/min, the total deposition of all 3 components of BGF pMDI (57.2% to 58.5%) remained higher compared with FF/UMEC/VI DPI (19.8% to 34.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings provide quantitative insights into relative lung deposition distribution profiles and efficiency of delivery for 3 inhaler options. Further research is needed to understand if these deposition patterns could translate into real-world clinical effectiveness differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":48818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"20 ","pages":"2103-2116"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12214429/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Silico Lung Deposition Profiles of Three Single-Inhaler Triple Therapies in Patients with COPD Using Functional Respiratory Imaging.\",\"authors\":\"Dave Singh, Nicolas Roche, Libo Wu, Hosein Sadafi, Jan De Backer, Navid Monshi Tousi, Jonathan Marshall\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/COPD.S510214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Inhalation is the foundational route for administering pharmacological treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Given the relevance of both large and small airways in COPD, lung distribution deposition characteristics of different inhaler options could influence treatment effects. This study evaluated the total deposition of 3 single-inhaler triple therapies in the large and small airways.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study assessed lung deposition of different inhalers using in silico functional respiratory imaging from 20 patients with COPD. The first part evaluated budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BGF) pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI), beclomethasone dipropionate/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BDP/G/F) pMDI, and fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) dry powder inhaler (DPI) at 30 L/min. The second part assessed BGF pMDI and FF/UMEC/VI DPI at 60 L/min.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 3 inhalers had different in silico total lung and large and small airways deposition profiles at 30 L/min, with BGF pMDI (54.8% to 57.7%) demonstrating a higher deposition profile across each therapeutic component versus BDP/G/F pMDI (38.6% to 40.5%) and FF/UMEC/VI DPI (24.0% to 36.1%), respectively. Similarly, at 60 L/min, the total deposition of all 3 components of BGF pMDI (57.2% to 58.5%) remained higher compared with FF/UMEC/VI DPI (19.8% to 34.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings provide quantitative insights into relative lung deposition distribution profiles and efficiency of delivery for 3 inhaler options. Further research is needed to understand if these deposition patterns could translate into real-world clinical effectiveness differences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"2103-2116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12214429/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S510214\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S510214","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
In Silico Lung Deposition Profiles of Three Single-Inhaler Triple Therapies in Patients with COPD Using Functional Respiratory Imaging.
Introduction: Inhalation is the foundational route for administering pharmacological treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Given the relevance of both large and small airways in COPD, lung distribution deposition characteristics of different inhaler options could influence treatment effects. This study evaluated the total deposition of 3 single-inhaler triple therapies in the large and small airways.
Methods: This study assessed lung deposition of different inhalers using in silico functional respiratory imaging from 20 patients with COPD. The first part evaluated budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BGF) pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI), beclomethasone dipropionate/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BDP/G/F) pMDI, and fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) dry powder inhaler (DPI) at 30 L/min. The second part assessed BGF pMDI and FF/UMEC/VI DPI at 60 L/min.
Results: All 3 inhalers had different in silico total lung and large and small airways deposition profiles at 30 L/min, with BGF pMDI (54.8% to 57.7%) demonstrating a higher deposition profile across each therapeutic component versus BDP/G/F pMDI (38.6% to 40.5%) and FF/UMEC/VI DPI (24.0% to 36.1%), respectively. Similarly, at 60 L/min, the total deposition of all 3 components of BGF pMDI (57.2% to 58.5%) remained higher compared with FF/UMEC/VI DPI (19.8% to 34.1%).
Conclusion: These findings provide quantitative insights into relative lung deposition distribution profiles and efficiency of delivery for 3 inhaler options. Further research is needed to understand if these deposition patterns could translate into real-world clinical effectiveness differences.
期刊介绍:
An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies and reviews in COPD. Special focus will be given to the pathophysiological processes underlying the disease, intervention programs, patient focused education, and self management protocols. This journal is directed at specialists and healthcare professionals