经导管主动脉瓣植入术中冠状动脉疾病的管理:经皮冠状动脉介入时机的系统回顾和荟萃分析以及管理的算法方法。

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY
Interventional Cardiology Review Pub Date : 2025-06-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.15420/icr.2024.51
Cian Murray, Caoimhe Ryan, Michael Cronin, Hugo Temperley, Niall O'Sullivan, Stephen O'Connor, Andrew Maree, Mark Hensey
{"title":"经导管主动脉瓣植入术中冠状动脉疾病的管理:经皮冠状动脉介入时机的系统回顾和荟萃分析以及管理的算法方法。","authors":"Cian Murray, Caoimhe Ryan, Michael Cronin, Hugo Temperley, Niall O'Sullivan, Stephen O'Connor, Andrew Maree, Mark Hensey","doi":"10.15420/icr.2024.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is widely performed for severe aortic stenosis (AS), often accompanied by coronary artery disease (CAD). The optimal management of CAD in TAVI patients remains uncertain. This study reviews the evidence on percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) timing in TAVI, and proposes an algorithmic approach for CAD management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane identified studies comparing PCI timing strategies in TAVI patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies with 15,412 participants were included. Mortality at 30 days (OR 5.70; 95% CI [1.34-24.36]) and 2 years (OR 4.40; 95% CI [2.60-7.44]) were significantly higher in the combined pre-TAVI and concomitant PCI group than in the post-TAVI cohort. Rates of other periprocedural complications, such as stroke and bleeding, varied across studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is no clear consensus on PCI timing in TAVI due to a lack of high-quality randomised data. An individualised, algorithmic approach is proposed for managing CAD in patients undergoing TAVI.</p>","PeriodicalId":38586,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Cardiology Review","volume":"20 ","pages":"e21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12215414/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of Coronary Artery Disease in the Context of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Timing and an Algorithmic Approach to Management.\",\"authors\":\"Cian Murray, Caoimhe Ryan, Michael Cronin, Hugo Temperley, Niall O'Sullivan, Stephen O'Connor, Andrew Maree, Mark Hensey\",\"doi\":\"10.15420/icr.2024.51\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is widely performed for severe aortic stenosis (AS), often accompanied by coronary artery disease (CAD). The optimal management of CAD in TAVI patients remains uncertain. This study reviews the evidence on percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) timing in TAVI, and proposes an algorithmic approach for CAD management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane identified studies comparing PCI timing strategies in TAVI patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies with 15,412 participants were included. Mortality at 30 days (OR 5.70; 95% CI [1.34-24.36]) and 2 years (OR 4.40; 95% CI [2.60-7.44]) were significantly higher in the combined pre-TAVI and concomitant PCI group than in the post-TAVI cohort. Rates of other periprocedural complications, such as stroke and bleeding, varied across studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is no clear consensus on PCI timing in TAVI due to a lack of high-quality randomised data. An individualised, algorithmic approach is proposed for managing CAD in patients undergoing TAVI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Cardiology Review\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"e21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12215414/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Cardiology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2024.51\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Cardiology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2024.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)广泛用于重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS),通常伴有冠状动脉疾病(CAD)。TAVI患者CAD的最佳治疗仍不确定。本研究回顾了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)时机的证据,并提出了一种CAD管理的算法方法。方法:综合检索PubMed, EMBASE和Cochrane,确定比较TAVI患者PCI时间策略的研究。结果:纳入13项研究,15412名参与者。30天死亡率(OR 5.70;95% CI[1.34-24.36])和2年(OR 4.40;tavi前合并PCI组的95% CI[2.60-7.44]显著高于tavi后组。其他围手术期并发症的发生率,如中风和出血,在不同的研究中有所不同。结论:由于缺乏高质量的随机数据,对TAVI的PCI时机没有明确的共识。提出了一种个性化的算法方法来管理TAVI患者的CAD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management of Coronary Artery Disease in the Context of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Timing and an Algorithmic Approach to Management.

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is widely performed for severe aortic stenosis (AS), often accompanied by coronary artery disease (CAD). The optimal management of CAD in TAVI patients remains uncertain. This study reviews the evidence on percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) timing in TAVI, and proposes an algorithmic approach for CAD management.

Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane identified studies comparing PCI timing strategies in TAVI patients.

Results: Thirteen studies with 15,412 participants were included. Mortality at 30 days (OR 5.70; 95% CI [1.34-24.36]) and 2 years (OR 4.40; 95% CI [2.60-7.44]) were significantly higher in the combined pre-TAVI and concomitant PCI group than in the post-TAVI cohort. Rates of other periprocedural complications, such as stroke and bleeding, varied across studies.

Conclusion: There is no clear consensus on PCI timing in TAVI due to a lack of high-quality randomised data. An individualised, algorithmic approach is proposed for managing CAD in patients undergoing TAVI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Interventional Cardiology Review
Interventional Cardiology Review Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信