{"title":"经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗重度单纯原生主动脉反流的临床疗效及安全性。","authors":"Jiantao Chen, Yi Zhang, Kangni Feng, Suiqing Huang, Hanri Xiao, Mengya Liang, Zhongkai Wu","doi":"10.3724/zdxbyxb-2024-0515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the early clinical efficacy and safety of trans-catheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for patients with severe pure native aortic regurgitation (PNAR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 48 PNAR patients who underwent TAVR at the Department of Cardiac Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between March 2019 and February 2025, including 25 cases with transfemoral approach (TF-TAVR group) and 23 cases with transapical approach (TA-TAVR group). Efficacy and safety were assessed by analyzing baseline characteristics, all-cause mortality, and procedure-related complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the TA-TAVR group, the TF-TAVR group exhibited significantly smaller aortic annulus circumference and diameter, left ventricular outflow tract circumference and diameter, diameters of the left, right, and non-coronary sinuses, and sinotubular junction (STJ) diameter, with a shorter distance from the STJ to the aortic valve basal ring plane (all <i>P</i><0.01). Additionally, the TF-TAVR group had a smaller annulus angle (<i>P</i><0.05), and showed a deeper prosthesis implantation depth relative to the aortic valve basal ring plane (<i>P</i><0.01). Post-TAVR, both groups demonstrated significant improvement in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (both <i>P</i><0.05), but only the TA-TAVR group showed significant reduction in left ventricular end-systolic diameter (<i>P</i><0.05). The overall technical success rate was 91.67%, and device success rate was 83.33%. For primary outcomes, in-hospital mortality occurred in 2 patients (4.17%). No additional deaths were reported at 60 d or 90 d after surgery. During 90-180 d after surgery, one patient in the TF-TAVR group (4.76%) died of sudden cardiac death, and one in the TA-TAVR group (6.25%) died of gastrointestinal bleeding. During 180 d-1 year after surgery, one patient in the TF-TAVR group (9.09%) died of low cardiac output syndrome. No statistically significant differences were observed in 1-year Kaplan-Meier survival curves between two groups (<i>P</i>>0.05). No conduction block events occurred in TA-TAVR group, while high-grade atrioventricular block, left bundle branch block, permanent pacemaker implantation occurred in TF-TAVR group during hospitalization or 1-year follow-up (12.00%, 4.00%, and 12.00%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TAVR demonstrates high success rates and acceptable safety for severe PNAR patients who are unable to undergo traditional surgical procedures. Although TF-TAVR may face more challenges in certain complex cases than TA-TAVR, the overall outcomes are promising.</p>","PeriodicalId":24007,"journal":{"name":"Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical efficacy and safety of transcatheter aortic valve replacement for patients with severe pure native aortic regurgitation.\",\"authors\":\"Jiantao Chen, Yi Zhang, Kangni Feng, Suiqing Huang, Hanri Xiao, Mengya Liang, Zhongkai Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.3724/zdxbyxb-2024-0515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the early clinical efficacy and safety of trans-catheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for patients with severe pure native aortic regurgitation (PNAR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 48 PNAR patients who underwent TAVR at the Department of Cardiac Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between March 2019 and February 2025, including 25 cases with transfemoral approach (TF-TAVR group) and 23 cases with transapical approach (TA-TAVR group). Efficacy and safety were assessed by analyzing baseline characteristics, all-cause mortality, and procedure-related complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the TA-TAVR group, the TF-TAVR group exhibited significantly smaller aortic annulus circumference and diameter, left ventricular outflow tract circumference and diameter, diameters of the left, right, and non-coronary sinuses, and sinotubular junction (STJ) diameter, with a shorter distance from the STJ to the aortic valve basal ring plane (all <i>P</i><0.01). Additionally, the TF-TAVR group had a smaller annulus angle (<i>P</i><0.05), and showed a deeper prosthesis implantation depth relative to the aortic valve basal ring plane (<i>P</i><0.01). Post-TAVR, both groups demonstrated significant improvement in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (both <i>P</i><0.05), but only the TA-TAVR group showed significant reduction in left ventricular end-systolic diameter (<i>P</i><0.05). The overall technical success rate was 91.67%, and device success rate was 83.33%. For primary outcomes, in-hospital mortality occurred in 2 patients (4.17%). No additional deaths were reported at 60 d or 90 d after surgery. During 90-180 d after surgery, one patient in the TF-TAVR group (4.76%) died of sudden cardiac death, and one in the TA-TAVR group (6.25%) died of gastrointestinal bleeding. During 180 d-1 year after surgery, one patient in the TF-TAVR group (9.09%) died of low cardiac output syndrome. No statistically significant differences were observed in 1-year Kaplan-Meier survival curves between two groups (<i>P</i>>0.05). No conduction block events occurred in TA-TAVR group, while high-grade atrioventricular block, left bundle branch block, permanent pacemaker implantation occurred in TF-TAVR group during hospitalization or 1-year follow-up (12.00%, 4.00%, and 12.00%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TAVR demonstrates high success rates and acceptable safety for severe PNAR patients who are unable to undergo traditional surgical procedures. Although TF-TAVR may face more challenges in certain complex cases than TA-TAVR, the overall outcomes are promising.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":24007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3724/zdxbyxb-2024-0515\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3724/zdxbyxb-2024-0515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical efficacy and safety of transcatheter aortic valve replacement for patients with severe pure native aortic regurgitation.
Objectives: To evaluate the early clinical efficacy and safety of trans-catheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for patients with severe pure native aortic regurgitation (PNAR).
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 48 PNAR patients who underwent TAVR at the Department of Cardiac Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between March 2019 and February 2025, including 25 cases with transfemoral approach (TF-TAVR group) and 23 cases with transapical approach (TA-TAVR group). Efficacy and safety were assessed by analyzing baseline characteristics, all-cause mortality, and procedure-related complications.
Results: Compared with the TA-TAVR group, the TF-TAVR group exhibited significantly smaller aortic annulus circumference and diameter, left ventricular outflow tract circumference and diameter, diameters of the left, right, and non-coronary sinuses, and sinotubular junction (STJ) diameter, with a shorter distance from the STJ to the aortic valve basal ring plane (all P<0.01). Additionally, the TF-TAVR group had a smaller annulus angle (P<0.05), and showed a deeper prosthesis implantation depth relative to the aortic valve basal ring plane (P<0.01). Post-TAVR, both groups demonstrated significant improvement in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (both P<0.05), but only the TA-TAVR group showed significant reduction in left ventricular end-systolic diameter (P<0.05). The overall technical success rate was 91.67%, and device success rate was 83.33%. For primary outcomes, in-hospital mortality occurred in 2 patients (4.17%). No additional deaths were reported at 60 d or 90 d after surgery. During 90-180 d after surgery, one patient in the TF-TAVR group (4.76%) died of sudden cardiac death, and one in the TA-TAVR group (6.25%) died of gastrointestinal bleeding. During 180 d-1 year after surgery, one patient in the TF-TAVR group (9.09%) died of low cardiac output syndrome. No statistically significant differences were observed in 1-year Kaplan-Meier survival curves between two groups (P>0.05). No conduction block events occurred in TA-TAVR group, while high-grade atrioventricular block, left bundle branch block, permanent pacemaker implantation occurred in TF-TAVR group during hospitalization or 1-year follow-up (12.00%, 4.00%, and 12.00%, respectively).
Conclusions: TAVR demonstrates high success rates and acceptable safety for severe PNAR patients who are unable to undergo traditional surgical procedures. Although TF-TAVR may face more challenges in certain complex cases than TA-TAVR, the overall outcomes are promising.