练习在轻度认知障碍患者中的有效性和可接受性:系统综述和网络荟萃分析的方案。

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Xi Chen, Dian Jiang, Yifei Chen, Yishu Zhu, Hongting Ning, Hui Feng
{"title":"练习在轻度认知障碍患者中的有效性和可接受性:系统综述和网络荟萃分析的方案。","authors":"Xi Chen, Dian Jiang, Yifei Chen, Yishu Zhu, Hongting Ning, Hui Feng","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02875-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Exergaming shows great potential in the intervention of individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, further research is needed on the use of exergaming in people with MCI. The current evidence of the use of exergaming in MCI has conflicting results. Which kind of exergaming is the most effective is uncertain. There is no overview of systematic reviews of exergaming in MCI, which makes the quality of the methods used for these systematic reviews unclear. The acceptability of the application of exergaming in people with MCI is uncertain. Therefore, this study will explore the effectiveness and acceptability of exergaming in MCI.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>An overview of systematic reviews will be conducted according to the general principles of systematic reviewing methodology. A network meta-analysis will be conducted to compare the effectiveness of different exergames. A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) checklist has been completed. We will retrieve systematic reviews or meta-analysis from six databases from inception to January 2025. A list of included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) will be retrieved from eligible systematic reviews. AMSTAR 2 will be used for methodological quality assessment. Methodological quality assessment of the included RCTs will be performed using \"the Version 2 of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in RCTs\" (RoB 2). We will use the PRISMA statement to report quality evaluation. The certainty of evidence that contributes to network estimation will be assessed through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Effectiveness and acceptability will be measured by standardized mean differences (SMDs) and odds ratios (ORs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). In this study, we will adhere to established methods for conducting pairwise meta-analyses, followed by a network meta-analysis. Data analysis will be performed using Stata version 14.1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of this study will provide a comprehensive synthesis of evidence regarding the effectiveness and acceptability of exergaming in people with mild cognitive impairment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The conclusions of this study will provide evidence-based recommendations to guide the implementation of exergaming interventions for individuals with mild cognitive impairment and provide valuable insights for guidelines and future research in this field.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023421052.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"132"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12220129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness and acceptability of exergaming in people with mild cognitive impairment: protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Xi Chen, Dian Jiang, Yifei Chen, Yishu Zhu, Hongting Ning, Hui Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13643-025-02875-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Exergaming shows great potential in the intervention of individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, further research is needed on the use of exergaming in people with MCI. The current evidence of the use of exergaming in MCI has conflicting results. Which kind of exergaming is the most effective is uncertain. There is no overview of systematic reviews of exergaming in MCI, which makes the quality of the methods used for these systematic reviews unclear. The acceptability of the application of exergaming in people with MCI is uncertain. Therefore, this study will explore the effectiveness and acceptability of exergaming in MCI.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>An overview of systematic reviews will be conducted according to the general principles of systematic reviewing methodology. A network meta-analysis will be conducted to compare the effectiveness of different exergames. A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) checklist has been completed. We will retrieve systematic reviews or meta-analysis from six databases from inception to January 2025. A list of included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) will be retrieved from eligible systematic reviews. AMSTAR 2 will be used for methodological quality assessment. Methodological quality assessment of the included RCTs will be performed using \\\"the Version 2 of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in RCTs\\\" (RoB 2). We will use the PRISMA statement to report quality evaluation. The certainty of evidence that contributes to network estimation will be assessed through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Effectiveness and acceptability will be measured by standardized mean differences (SMDs) and odds ratios (ORs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). In this study, we will adhere to established methods for conducting pairwise meta-analyses, followed by a network meta-analysis. Data analysis will be performed using Stata version 14.1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of this study will provide a comprehensive synthesis of evidence regarding the effectiveness and acceptability of exergaming in people with mild cognitive impairment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The conclusions of this study will provide evidence-based recommendations to guide the implementation of exergaming interventions for individuals with mild cognitive impairment and provide valuable insights for guidelines and future research in this field.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023421052.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12220129/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02875-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02875-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

练习游戏在轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者的干预中显示出巨大的潜力。然而,游戏在轻度认知障碍患者中的应用还需要进一步的研究。目前在轻度认知障碍中使用游戏的证据有相互矛盾的结果。哪一种游戏是最有效的还不确定。没有关于MCI中学习的系统综述,这使得用于这些系统综述的方法的质量不明确。在轻度认知障碍患者中应用游戏的可接受性是不确定的。因此,本研究将探讨练习在轻度认知损伤中的有效性和可接受性。方法与分析:根据系统评价方法的一般原则,对系统评价进行概述。我们将进行网络元分析来比较不同游戏的有效性。已完成系统评价和荟萃分析方案首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)清单。我们将从六个数据库中检索从成立到2025年1月的系统综述或荟萃分析。纳入的随机对照试验(rct)列表将从符合条件的系统评价中检索。AMSTAR 2将用于方法学质量评估。将使用“Cochrane rct偏倚风险评估工具第2版”(RoB 2)对纳入的rct进行方法学质量评估。我们将使用PRISMA声明报告质量评估。有助于网络估计的证据的确定性将通过建议分级评估、发展和评估(GRADE)框架进行评估。有效性和可接受性将通过标准化平均差异(SMDs)和95%置信区间(CI)的优势比(ORs)来衡量。在本研究中,我们将遵循既定的方法进行两两元分析,然后进行网络元分析。数据分析将使用Stata 14.1版本执行。结果:本研究的结果将为轻度认知障碍患者运动的有效性和可接受性提供全面的综合证据。结论:本研究结论将为指导轻度认知障碍个体运动干预的实施提供循证建议,并为该领域的指南和未来研究提供有价值的见解。系统评价注册:PROSPERO CRD42023421052。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness and acceptability of exergaming in people with mild cognitive impairment: protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and network meta-analysis.

Introduction: Exergaming shows great potential in the intervention of individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, further research is needed on the use of exergaming in people with MCI. The current evidence of the use of exergaming in MCI has conflicting results. Which kind of exergaming is the most effective is uncertain. There is no overview of systematic reviews of exergaming in MCI, which makes the quality of the methods used for these systematic reviews unclear. The acceptability of the application of exergaming in people with MCI is uncertain. Therefore, this study will explore the effectiveness and acceptability of exergaming in MCI.

Methods and analysis: An overview of systematic reviews will be conducted according to the general principles of systematic reviewing methodology. A network meta-analysis will be conducted to compare the effectiveness of different exergames. A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) checklist has been completed. We will retrieve systematic reviews or meta-analysis from six databases from inception to January 2025. A list of included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) will be retrieved from eligible systematic reviews. AMSTAR 2 will be used for methodological quality assessment. Methodological quality assessment of the included RCTs will be performed using "the Version 2 of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in RCTs" (RoB 2). We will use the PRISMA statement to report quality evaluation. The certainty of evidence that contributes to network estimation will be assessed through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Effectiveness and acceptability will be measured by standardized mean differences (SMDs) and odds ratios (ORs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). In this study, we will adhere to established methods for conducting pairwise meta-analyses, followed by a network meta-analysis. Data analysis will be performed using Stata version 14.1.

Results: The results of this study will provide a comprehensive synthesis of evidence regarding the effectiveness and acceptability of exergaming in people with mild cognitive impairment.

Conclusion: The conclusions of this study will provide evidence-based recommendations to guide the implementation of exergaming interventions for individuals with mild cognitive impairment and provide valuable insights for guidelines and future research in this field.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42023421052.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信