{"title":"提高精子参数的最佳运动强度:啮齿动物研究的网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Yinchu Hu, Ruiqiong Li, Mimi Chen, Yidong Chen, Qi Wang, Xiaowei Zhang, Yanhui Lu, Mingjie Yao, Yao Dang, Lihua Ren","doi":"10.1007/s43032-025-01926-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exercise training as a potential intervention to improve male reproductive health, its efficacy appears to be contingent on exercise intensity. However, the optimal training intensity remains poorly defined. Hence, this study aimed to identify the optimal exercise intensity for improving sperm parameters through network meta-analysis of rodent studies. The comprehensive search across eight databases ultimately identified 35 eligible studies, coving four different exercises: low-intensity continuous training (LICT), moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT), high-intensity continuous training (HICT), and high-intensity interval training (HIIT). The network meta-analysis indicated that MICT showed superior efficacy versus HICT in terms of sperm concentration (MD: 15.28, 95% CI: 2.52-28.04). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value, an indicator to quantify the relative ranking probability of interventions, indicated the highest probability of MICT being optimal training for increasing sperm concentration in both healthy (SUCRA 77.6%) and unhealthy groups (SUCRA 80.1%). Additionally, MICT (MD: 12.23, 95% CI: 7.97-16.48) and HIIT (MD: 10.94, 95% CI: 1.10, 20.78) were superior to sedentary control in improving sperm motility. However, HICT was associated with a significant reduction in normal sperm morphology compared to sedentary control (MD: -10.05, 95% CI: -19.53- -0.58) and MICT (MD: -17.25, 95% CI: -32.17- -2.33). These preclinical results position MICT as the preferred exercise modality for sperm quality improvement, with HIIT as an alternative. However, environmental and lifestyle confounders unique to humans require careful attention when extrapolating these findings to human populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":20920,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal Exercise Intensity for Enhancing Sperm Parameters: A Network Meta-Analysis of Rodent Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Yinchu Hu, Ruiqiong Li, Mimi Chen, Yidong Chen, Qi Wang, Xiaowei Zhang, Yanhui Lu, Mingjie Yao, Yao Dang, Lihua Ren\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43032-025-01926-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Exercise training as a potential intervention to improve male reproductive health, its efficacy appears to be contingent on exercise intensity. However, the optimal training intensity remains poorly defined. Hence, this study aimed to identify the optimal exercise intensity for improving sperm parameters through network meta-analysis of rodent studies. The comprehensive search across eight databases ultimately identified 35 eligible studies, coving four different exercises: low-intensity continuous training (LICT), moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT), high-intensity continuous training (HICT), and high-intensity interval training (HIIT). The network meta-analysis indicated that MICT showed superior efficacy versus HICT in terms of sperm concentration (MD: 15.28, 95% CI: 2.52-28.04). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value, an indicator to quantify the relative ranking probability of interventions, indicated the highest probability of MICT being optimal training for increasing sperm concentration in both healthy (SUCRA 77.6%) and unhealthy groups (SUCRA 80.1%). Additionally, MICT (MD: 12.23, 95% CI: 7.97-16.48) and HIIT (MD: 10.94, 95% CI: 1.10, 20.78) were superior to sedentary control in improving sperm motility. However, HICT was associated with a significant reduction in normal sperm morphology compared to sedentary control (MD: -10.05, 95% CI: -19.53- -0.58) and MICT (MD: -17.25, 95% CI: -32.17- -2.33). These preclinical results position MICT as the preferred exercise modality for sperm quality improvement, with HIIT as an alternative. However, environmental and lifestyle confounders unique to humans require careful attention when extrapolating these findings to human populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-025-01926-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-025-01926-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimal Exercise Intensity for Enhancing Sperm Parameters: A Network Meta-Analysis of Rodent Studies.
Exercise training as a potential intervention to improve male reproductive health, its efficacy appears to be contingent on exercise intensity. However, the optimal training intensity remains poorly defined. Hence, this study aimed to identify the optimal exercise intensity for improving sperm parameters through network meta-analysis of rodent studies. The comprehensive search across eight databases ultimately identified 35 eligible studies, coving four different exercises: low-intensity continuous training (LICT), moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT), high-intensity continuous training (HICT), and high-intensity interval training (HIIT). The network meta-analysis indicated that MICT showed superior efficacy versus HICT in terms of sperm concentration (MD: 15.28, 95% CI: 2.52-28.04). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value, an indicator to quantify the relative ranking probability of interventions, indicated the highest probability of MICT being optimal training for increasing sperm concentration in both healthy (SUCRA 77.6%) and unhealthy groups (SUCRA 80.1%). Additionally, MICT (MD: 12.23, 95% CI: 7.97-16.48) and HIIT (MD: 10.94, 95% CI: 1.10, 20.78) were superior to sedentary control in improving sperm motility. However, HICT was associated with a significant reduction in normal sperm morphology compared to sedentary control (MD: -10.05, 95% CI: -19.53- -0.58) and MICT (MD: -17.25, 95% CI: -32.17- -2.33). These preclinical results position MICT as the preferred exercise modality for sperm quality improvement, with HIIT as an alternative. However, environmental and lifestyle confounders unique to humans require careful attention when extrapolating these findings to human populations.
期刊介绍:
Reproductive Sciences (RS) is a peer-reviewed, monthly journal publishing original research and reviews in obstetrics and gynecology. RS is multi-disciplinary and includes research in basic reproductive biology and medicine, maternal-fetal medicine, obstetrics, gynecology, reproductive endocrinology, urogynecology, fertility/infertility, embryology, gynecologic/reproductive oncology, developmental biology, stem cell research, molecular/cellular biology and other related fields.