提高精子参数的最佳运动强度:啮齿动物研究的网络荟萃分析。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Yinchu Hu, Ruiqiong Li, Mimi Chen, Yidong Chen, Qi Wang, Xiaowei Zhang, Yanhui Lu, Mingjie Yao, Yao Dang, Lihua Ren
{"title":"提高精子参数的最佳运动强度:啮齿动物研究的网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Yinchu Hu, Ruiqiong Li, Mimi Chen, Yidong Chen, Qi Wang, Xiaowei Zhang, Yanhui Lu, Mingjie Yao, Yao Dang, Lihua Ren","doi":"10.1007/s43032-025-01926-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exercise training as a potential intervention to improve male reproductive health, its efficacy appears to be contingent on exercise intensity. However, the optimal training intensity remains poorly defined. Hence, this study aimed to identify the optimal exercise intensity for improving sperm parameters through network meta-analysis of rodent studies. The comprehensive search across eight databases ultimately identified 35 eligible studies, coving four different exercises: low-intensity continuous training (LICT), moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT), high-intensity continuous training (HICT), and high-intensity interval training (HIIT). The network meta-analysis indicated that MICT showed superior efficacy versus HICT in terms of sperm concentration (MD: 15.28, 95% CI: 2.52-28.04). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value, an indicator to quantify the relative ranking probability of interventions, indicated the highest probability of MICT being optimal training for increasing sperm concentration in both healthy (SUCRA 77.6%) and unhealthy groups (SUCRA 80.1%). Additionally, MICT (MD: 12.23, 95% CI: 7.97-16.48) and HIIT (MD: 10.94, 95% CI: 1.10, 20.78) were superior to sedentary control in improving sperm motility. However, HICT was associated with a significant reduction in normal sperm morphology compared to sedentary control (MD: -10.05, 95% CI: -19.53- -0.58) and MICT (MD: -17.25, 95% CI: -32.17- -2.33). These preclinical results position MICT as the preferred exercise modality for sperm quality improvement, with HIIT as an alternative. However, environmental and lifestyle confounders unique to humans require careful attention when extrapolating these findings to human populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":20920,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal Exercise Intensity for Enhancing Sperm Parameters: A Network Meta-Analysis of Rodent Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Yinchu Hu, Ruiqiong Li, Mimi Chen, Yidong Chen, Qi Wang, Xiaowei Zhang, Yanhui Lu, Mingjie Yao, Yao Dang, Lihua Ren\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43032-025-01926-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Exercise training as a potential intervention to improve male reproductive health, its efficacy appears to be contingent on exercise intensity. However, the optimal training intensity remains poorly defined. Hence, this study aimed to identify the optimal exercise intensity for improving sperm parameters through network meta-analysis of rodent studies. The comprehensive search across eight databases ultimately identified 35 eligible studies, coving four different exercises: low-intensity continuous training (LICT), moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT), high-intensity continuous training (HICT), and high-intensity interval training (HIIT). The network meta-analysis indicated that MICT showed superior efficacy versus HICT in terms of sperm concentration (MD: 15.28, 95% CI: 2.52-28.04). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value, an indicator to quantify the relative ranking probability of interventions, indicated the highest probability of MICT being optimal training for increasing sperm concentration in both healthy (SUCRA 77.6%) and unhealthy groups (SUCRA 80.1%). Additionally, MICT (MD: 12.23, 95% CI: 7.97-16.48) and HIIT (MD: 10.94, 95% CI: 1.10, 20.78) were superior to sedentary control in improving sperm motility. However, HICT was associated with a significant reduction in normal sperm morphology compared to sedentary control (MD: -10.05, 95% CI: -19.53- -0.58) and MICT (MD: -17.25, 95% CI: -32.17- -2.33). These preclinical results position MICT as the preferred exercise modality for sperm quality improvement, with HIIT as an alternative. However, environmental and lifestyle confounders unique to humans require careful attention when extrapolating these findings to human populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-025-01926-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-025-01926-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

运动训练作为一种改善男性生殖健康的潜在干预手段,其效果似乎取决于运动强度。然而,最佳训练强度仍然没有明确的定义。因此,本研究旨在通过啮齿类动物研究的网络荟萃分析,确定改善精子参数的最佳运动强度。在8个数据库中进行的全面搜索最终确定了35项符合条件的研究,包括四种不同的训练:低强度连续训练(LICT)、中强度连续训练(MICT)、高强度连续训练(HICT)和高强度间歇训练(HIIT)。网络荟萃分析显示,MICT在精子浓度方面优于HICT (MD: 15.28, 95% CI: 2.52-28.04)。累积排序曲线下的曲面(SUCRA)值是量化干预措施相对排序概率的指标,表明MICT在健康组(SUCRA 77.6%)和不健康组(SUCRA 80.1%)中都是提高精子浓度的最佳训练的最高概率。此外,MICT (MD: 12.23, 95% CI: 7.97-16.48)和HIIT (MD: 10.94, 95% CI: 1.10, 20.78)在改善精子活力方面优于久坐对照组。然而,与久坐对照组相比,HICT与正常精子形态的显著降低相关(MD: -10.05, 95% CI: -19.53- -0.58)和MICT (MD: -17.25, 95% CI: -32.17- -2.33)。这些临床前结果表明,MICT是改善精子质量的首选运动方式,HIIT是另一种选择。然而,在将这些发现外推到人类群体时,需要仔细注意人类特有的环境和生活方式混杂因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimal Exercise Intensity for Enhancing Sperm Parameters: A Network Meta-Analysis of Rodent Studies.

Exercise training as a potential intervention to improve male reproductive health, its efficacy appears to be contingent on exercise intensity. However, the optimal training intensity remains poorly defined. Hence, this study aimed to identify the optimal exercise intensity for improving sperm parameters through network meta-analysis of rodent studies. The comprehensive search across eight databases ultimately identified 35 eligible studies, coving four different exercises: low-intensity continuous training (LICT), moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT), high-intensity continuous training (HICT), and high-intensity interval training (HIIT). The network meta-analysis indicated that MICT showed superior efficacy versus HICT in terms of sperm concentration (MD: 15.28, 95% CI: 2.52-28.04). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value, an indicator to quantify the relative ranking probability of interventions, indicated the highest probability of MICT being optimal training for increasing sperm concentration in both healthy (SUCRA 77.6%) and unhealthy groups (SUCRA 80.1%). Additionally, MICT (MD: 12.23, 95% CI: 7.97-16.48) and HIIT (MD: 10.94, 95% CI: 1.10, 20.78) were superior to sedentary control in improving sperm motility. However, HICT was associated with a significant reduction in normal sperm morphology compared to sedentary control (MD: -10.05, 95% CI: -19.53- -0.58) and MICT (MD: -17.25, 95% CI: -32.17- -2.33). These preclinical results position MICT as the preferred exercise modality for sperm quality improvement, with HIIT as an alternative. However, environmental and lifestyle confounders unique to humans require careful attention when extrapolating these findings to human populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive Sciences
Reproductive Sciences 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
322
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Sciences (RS) is a peer-reviewed, monthly journal publishing original research and reviews in obstetrics and gynecology. RS is multi-disciplinary and includes research in basic reproductive biology and medicine, maternal-fetal medicine, obstetrics, gynecology, reproductive endocrinology, urogynecology, fertility/infertility, embryology, gynecologic/reproductive oncology, developmental biology, stem cell research, molecular/cellular biology and other related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信