Manisha Teji, Nicholas Raison, Nicholas Faure-Walker
{"title":"逼尿肌过度活动亚型的临床意义:系统综述。","authors":"Manisha Teji, Nicholas Raison, Nicholas Faure-Walker","doi":"10.1002/nau.70110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Detrusor overactivity (DO) is the \"occurrence of detrusor contraction(s) during filling cystometry\" [7] and can be \"phasic\" or \"terminal\" [26]. The aim of this systematic review was to establish whether there is any clinical significance between the different subtypes of DO in terms of demographics, underlying pathophysiology, symptoms, other urodynamic parameters and response to treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane, MEDLINE, Web of Science and EMBASE databases in February 2024, following the PRISMA guidelines. The Newcastle Ottawa critical appraisal tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 16 relevant studies including eight prospective and eight retrospective studies. Patients with terminal DO were found to be significantly older (p = 0.0003) and were more likely to have suffered spinal cord trauma (p = 0.04) compared to those with phasic DO. Patients with terminal DO were also found to have higher symptom scores and more likely to also suffer with incontinence than those with phasic DO. Patients with terminal DO were found to have smaller functional capacities than those with phasic DO on urodynamics. Success rates, following trans-urethral resection of the prostate (TURP), were 69.2% for patients with phasic DO and 9.5% for those with terminal DO.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with terminal DO are more likely to be older, suffer with worse symptoms, have smaller bladder capacities and respond less favourably to treatment than those with phasic DO. Future studies incorporating DO should consider analysing these two sub-types of DO as separate clinical entities.</p>","PeriodicalId":19200,"journal":{"name":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","volume":" ","pages":"1484-1490"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12319479/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Clinical Significance of the Subtypes of Detrusor Overactivity: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Manisha Teji, Nicholas Raison, Nicholas Faure-Walker\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nau.70110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Detrusor overactivity (DO) is the \\\"occurrence of detrusor contraction(s) during filling cystometry\\\" [7] and can be \\\"phasic\\\" or \\\"terminal\\\" [26]. The aim of this systematic review was to establish whether there is any clinical significance between the different subtypes of DO in terms of demographics, underlying pathophysiology, symptoms, other urodynamic parameters and response to treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane, MEDLINE, Web of Science and EMBASE databases in February 2024, following the PRISMA guidelines. The Newcastle Ottawa critical appraisal tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 16 relevant studies including eight prospective and eight retrospective studies. Patients with terminal DO were found to be significantly older (p = 0.0003) and were more likely to have suffered spinal cord trauma (p = 0.04) compared to those with phasic DO. Patients with terminal DO were also found to have higher symptom scores and more likely to also suffer with incontinence than those with phasic DO. Patients with terminal DO were found to have smaller functional capacities than those with phasic DO on urodynamics. Success rates, following trans-urethral resection of the prostate (TURP), were 69.2% for patients with phasic DO and 9.5% for those with terminal DO.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with terminal DO are more likely to be older, suffer with worse symptoms, have smaller bladder capacities and respond less favourably to treatment than those with phasic DO. Future studies incorporating DO should consider analysing these two sub-types of DO as separate clinical entities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurourology and Urodynamics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1484-1490\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12319479/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurourology and Urodynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.70110\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.70110","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介:逼尿肌过度活动(DO)是“充盈膀胱术中出现逼尿肌收缩”[7],可以是“阶段性”或“终末期”[26]。本系统综述的目的是确定在人口统计学、潜在病理生理学、症状、其他尿动力学参数和对治疗的反应方面,不同亚型DO之间是否存在任何临床意义。方法:根据PRISMA指南,于2024年2月使用PubMed、Cochrane、MEDLINE、Web of Science和EMBASE数据库进行系统检索。纽卡斯尔渥太华关键评价工具用于评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。结果:检索确定了16项相关研究,包括8项前瞻性研究和8项回顾性研究。与相性DO患者相比,晚期DO患者明显更老(p = 0.0003),更容易遭受脊髓损伤(p = 0.04)。与阶段性DO相比,晚期DO患者也有更高的症状评分,更有可能出现尿失禁。在尿动力学方面,发现晚期DO患者的功能能力比期相DO患者小。经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)的成功率为69.2%,晚期DO患者为9.5%。结论:终末期DO患者年龄更大,症状更严重,膀胱容量更小,对治疗的反应更差。纳入DO的未来研究应考虑将这两种亚型DO作为独立的临床实体进行分析。
The Clinical Significance of the Subtypes of Detrusor Overactivity: A Systematic Review.
Introduction: Detrusor overactivity (DO) is the "occurrence of detrusor contraction(s) during filling cystometry" [7] and can be "phasic" or "terminal" [26]. The aim of this systematic review was to establish whether there is any clinical significance between the different subtypes of DO in terms of demographics, underlying pathophysiology, symptoms, other urodynamic parameters and response to treatment.
Methods: A systematic search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane, MEDLINE, Web of Science and EMBASE databases in February 2024, following the PRISMA guidelines. The Newcastle Ottawa critical appraisal tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies.
Results: The search identified 16 relevant studies including eight prospective and eight retrospective studies. Patients with terminal DO were found to be significantly older (p = 0.0003) and were more likely to have suffered spinal cord trauma (p = 0.04) compared to those with phasic DO. Patients with terminal DO were also found to have higher symptom scores and more likely to also suffer with incontinence than those with phasic DO. Patients with terminal DO were found to have smaller functional capacities than those with phasic DO on urodynamics. Success rates, following trans-urethral resection of the prostate (TURP), were 69.2% for patients with phasic DO and 9.5% for those with terminal DO.
Conclusion: Patients with terminal DO are more likely to be older, suffer with worse symptoms, have smaller bladder capacities and respond less favourably to treatment than those with phasic DO. Future studies incorporating DO should consider analysing these two sub-types of DO as separate clinical entities.
期刊介绍:
Neurourology and Urodynamics welcomes original scientific contributions from all parts of the world on topics related to urinary tract function, urinary and fecal continence and pelvic floor function.